Just killing a thread

Cure cancer or end world hunger?

Attached: Dr.Doctor.png (555x407, 12K)

neither let everything die

Why not give cancer to the hunger

woah dude you're fucking edgy

yes

This man is on to something.
k

Attached: 1527744520805.png (300x300, 42K)

Just cure cancer, fix both and the global population will explode and it would cause more wars and competition for resources.

YOU CANNOT SUPPRESS THE

SAXO KRUSHAMBLE

Also known as

(sex) and also (c.rusade)

its the HOT NEW THING that calls white men to subjugate and control non white women for the purpose of controlling their votes for white interests!

SEX CRUSHAMBLE

ALSO KNOWN AS

S,Ë,X, ,C,R,U,S,A,D,Ë

Attached: 1517285905963.jpg (1280x960, 343K)

This nigga has it right. Famines are a great way to limit how much a population expands. Remove hunger, and something worse will take its place

cure cancer of crouse

cure cancer then sell the cure for mad bux

how is it even a question, cure cancer of course

Assuming this doesn't just happen magically and there was some amount of structural and scientific change behind both options I'd say feed the hungry.
Since it would mean that we would most likely be in or on the cusp of a post scarcity civilization, i don't see another way of that happening.

Cure cancer.

More people die of cancer so starvation

YEAH BUT IF YOU CURE STARVATION THEN MORE PEOPLE WILL EXIST VIA THE PROCESS OF NOT STARVING TO DEATH AND THAT WILL LEAD TO ANOTHER EPIDEMIC OF STARVATION CONSIDERING THEIR RETARDS THAT DONT WANT TO LEARN HOW TO TAKE CARE OF THEMSELVES

ALSO

S/Ë/X/ /C/R/U/S/A/D/Ë

Attached: 1517010445974.jpg (1000x1000, 94K)

All of you what do you have to say about this

One thing gets in the way of a post scarcity civilization, in every single nation it's the same problem, human nature/behavior.

>Cure Cancer
More women and and faggots don't die of cancer
>End World Hunger
More niggers than already

there are much bigger problems

Let everyone die of cancer to end world hunger