I FIGURED IT OUT!

Attached: 1506920456329.png (1170x142, 61K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=eDSPQwRy9RQ
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/142560856/#q142568825
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/142628790
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/142673874/
youtube.com/watch?v=99O1TcVnTSY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Q predicted this

Attached: Arctic.2018034.terra.4km.jpg (2048x2048, 1.13M)

Taiga or nah?

Attached: Arctic.2017348.terra.4km.jpg (2048x2048, 1013K)

Attached: Arctic.2017319.terra.4km.jpg (2048x2048, 1.12M)

Attached: Arctic.2017289.terra.4km.jpg (2048x2048, 1.39M)

Attached: 1517248913777.jpg (2048x2048, 1.21M)

so what, its where they keep the generator...

Attached: 1509856712685.jpg (720x518, 31K)

Attached: Antarctica.2018122.terra.4km.jpg (2048x2048, 1.37M)

S H U T D O W N I S
H A P P E N I NG

So inorganic weather paterns

Ok what? Do tell

genarator?

youtube.com/watch?v=eDSPQwRy9RQ

I'm sure some great orogenic processes made this

What happened in the north pole user? what did you figure out?

there is only one pole...

Attached: 1509863743422.jpg (564x564, 67K)

kys

Attached: reed_hollow_earth_exploring_club-spokane_press-1908-04-13-p4-blog.png (500x299, 32K)

u first

Attached: 1509055685726.jpg (400x468, 58K)

Attached: file.png (1920x1080, 2.47M)

So magnents, how do they work ?

what did you figure out? what is the op image?

This picture makes Earth-chan blush.

Post from Antarctica. I'm guessing encrypted message of some sorts, HEX maybe?

Some dude from antarctica posted that code which translated into gibberish, but then I went to bing and I searched the gibberish and it led me to these images.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-06-09 at 1.26.20 AM.png (2158x1140, 493K)

K. Med time flat earther

...

...

Attached: thk_2015_1.png (530x582, 46K)

what did it decode to?

"jõ¦ÄT ¯Ë§§Ìà*Y3ßÜ:Qðe»ñyS

But then you should add the word antarctica after it and then the 4th link down should be lance.modis or something like that

Modis has other maps too ya know

I remember about 10 years ago when you checked out the globe on google earth the north pole was just a bunch of slices that all met at a center point, and you could not generate any detail of the north pole

Basic gestalt?

Yeah, there was a ton of pictures. I think part of draining the swamp is exposing pedos and then full disclosure.

how to do that?

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-06-09 at 2.02.42 AM.png (1983x1015, 3.23M)

there are military bases which get blocked

You really thing satmap drops on a vietnames basket weaving site would be the trumpy way

It happened on the 23rd of September 2017 as well and yes I do actually.

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/142560856/#q142568825
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/142628790
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/142673874/

Attached: ayy.jpg (1044x1078, 611K)

Well I would prefer data subsets on the cloud interference then over pictures

can you post the uncensored versions??

Attached: 1507521103214.jpg (1632x1224, 258K)

notice how its brighter

Attached: Antarctica.2017023.terra.4km.jpg (1536x1536, 678K)

Attached: antarctic ice clouds.gif (985x985, 3.62M)

why not photoshop them instead of an obvious crop

They did here

They're not, it's because satellites don't pass directly over the north pole, so they can't map anything there.

It's an orbital mechanics thing, so of course brainlets on Jow Forums don't get it.

take my pic, notice how the satellite orbit doesn't pass over the north/south pole? Now take this map and transform it into a sphere, what do you get? You get a hole at the north/south pole where there's no satellite coverage.

There's only a few satellites that pass over the poles because it's an expensive orbit to go into - expensive in this case means it costs a lot of delta-v to get there; due to the spin of the earth, satellites naturally want to following along the orbital plane, so you have to cancel that momentum out.

t. not a fucking retard.

Attached: Polar_Orbits_fig4.gif (551x276, 19K)

explain this

> satellites don't pass directly over the north pole
>There's only a few satellites that pass over the pole
reconcile this paradox

see

You kikes really think you can pretend like nobody has ever gotten data from the poles? Cmon now. Kys.

>5
That would be the north pole, they can't record that area because the satellite moves in another place

I'll explain it again, but you're apparently illiterate so I know it won't sink in: The satellite they get data from doesn't pass directly over the north/south pole. So they fill in the lack of data with something arbitrary, like the default sea-level.

see
>There's only a few satellites that pass over the poles

Attached: hollow earth nazis.jpg (2210x1600, 642K)

Attached: 2E712EA7-D2C1-4F17-84C6-EA09FA40BBEF.jpg (500x430, 33K)

ya man polish people are pretty smart and stuff

Attached: 1510314791592.jpg (890x1200, 324K)

Attached: 1507669694225-1.png (1893x791, 1.81M)

Attached: wefwe.png (855x996, 1.26M)

Attached: antarctica_undergound_access.png (1265x849, 682K)

so this is some set of data that doesnt include a collection of data over a long period of time, rather just one complete scan

Attached: satellites_northpole.jpg (600x444, 187K)

Attached: AdvancedMicrowaveScanningRadiometerOnNasa'sAqualSatellite2-25-2011.jpg (396x496, 52K)

>ever
Of course, there's plenty of data of the poles
Just not that particular image. It doesn't make economic sense to put every satelite on polar orbit. For example sea ice thickness data like that is mostly used in either navigation or environmental studies of the arctic region neither of which it's particularly crucial to get the actual pole data in

It's easy to understand if you're not a brainlet, unfortunately I realize I'm dealing with absolute fucking retards here: Most satellites are not in polar orbits. Of the ones that are, not all of them are in perfect polar orbits which get coverage directly over the north pole, and that's probably because the earth is tilted at something like 13 degrees off the orbital plane.

If your polar satellite does not perfectly pass over the north pole then you're not going to get data from right on top of the north pole. This isn't hard to understand.

Kys black cube cucks

Black sun boys

It's probably data spanning a month or three. I'll draw a really quick picture to illustrate the problem

So your saying Noctilucent is related now?

Attached: Sonnenrad.gif (700x394, 1.9M)

Allow me to shed some more light on the possible reasoning that the satellites dont pass over the north poles
If you are launching a satellite then a lot of the velocity to get it in orbit actually comes from the rotation of the earth, meaning the best spot to launch from is on the equator going with the rotation of the earth, then the satellites start to slowly change their velocity to the side so that they can spin around the earth anywhere that they desire. The north pole is the most far from the equator and yields only a small amount of irrelevant information compared to the costs of drifting that much further from the axis of launching

Attached: 01.jpg (1045x1125, 208K)

should we go to sleep now too?

Basically, you can find some data sets where they do scan the north pole
you are basically placing this operation with the burden of proof that the north pole exists so if they knew that maybe it would have gone differently

welp, i know what im looking into next

anyone dumping FE shit is either FBI Counter Intelligence or a worthless person with no life

Here we go. If you can't understand my shitty mspaint drawing oh well.

Attached: Untitled.png (1064x911, 28K)

Attached: 1606_Mercator_Hondius_Map_of_the_Arctic_%28First_Map_of_the_North_Pole%29_-_Geographicus_-_NorthPole (3500x3290, 3.72M)

satellites can rotate the Earth 24 times a day so I dont think the season is the problem, rather my 2 previous posts
in other words, no matter the tilt of the axis, the sattelite is always launching 90* from the north or south pole

youtube.com/watch?v=99O1TcVnTSY

Attached: South-north.png (1576x872, 1.14M)

It's a bit of both actually, polar orbits are just very costly to launch and maintain compared to lower inclination orbits

Also polar orbits offer less coverage of commonly interesting spots for most applications than normal orbits so there is that as well. Polar orbits are only particularly useful when needing to observer the poles directly or when there is a variable need for data such as spy satellites or earth mapping

Attached: 1503929921157.jpg (2408x1678, 982K)

Attached: Hyperboreon.jpg (1280x964, 622K)

TAIWAN #1

>the equator is the hottest place on earth
How the fuck can you be this retarded?

Attached: 995px-Annual_Average_Temperature_Map.jpg (995x768, 141K)

what the actual fuck is this autism and ignorance clusterfuck thread

i think u guys are right check out this photo i found of the south pole too!

Attached: 2nd impact.jpg (260x149, 5K)

Attached: xltk_47_280.jpg.pagespeed.ic.davyhupe9x.jpg (280x442, 95K)

Jow Forums more like /x/ huehuhe

Attached: .jpg (1024x1024, 243K)

It's a Jow Forums thread, so yes.

Attached: 1528414909498.png (709x1085, 327K)

It's like the earth spins around every 24 hours