I thought about this several times and it isn't ridiculous I suppose: In these times where Christianity in the western world is dying and becoming absolutely degenerate, why don't we see the true prophet in our Führer? Christians were laughed at initially and through a dying empire it spread all over Europe. The story of our Führer is way more exciting and tragic and also ends with the death as martyr. I can truly see big potential in his story if we Europeans manage to survive the current struggle.
Jack Kelly
And how should we call the new faith?
Jonathan Taylor
Awkward picture, also RARE
Austin Scott
I have considered this as well. There is absolutely no reason why the Führer couldn't be a new Christ for a new National Socialist faith. In fact, I believe this is what they would fear the most. He is already beyond a mortal man, in how he is not depicted as a person but as a demon by both the left and the mainstream liberal regime. He is a myth, larger than life. But it took more than Christ to create Christianity; it took centuries, and many faithful to create Christendom as we know it today. So too will it be for the Führer.
I haven't read it but to me it always seemed a very specific book meant for a very specific time. From what I've gleaned it's mostly dealing with the direct situation in Germany and not much else. What kind of universal wisdom does Mein Kampf have, if any, and what can be learned from it from a 21st century standpoint?
Brandon Sullivan
In a lot of ways, yes it is. There's big parts of it that are really only good if you have an interest in history, you don't get a ton out of those if you aren't. He has a lot to say about human psychology I think. What is most interesting about it aside from his take on Jews and Marxism is how transparent he is about the parties goals and how to achieve them. He considers the masses of German to be naive and not particularly intelligent (or downright stupid) and they're easily manipulated by the press, Marxists, etc. He also basically says that propaganda must target the lowest common denominator and intellectuals can be ignored. That and how all rival ideologies, especially ones close to National Socialism are detrimental to his cause and should be eliminated. I can't imagine any politician today writing a book like it.
There's also a lot about his experiences with the press, a lot of which sounds similar to what goes on with the mainstream media today (fake news etc.). There's obviously all the Jew stuff, which is relevant IMO, but if you're not already familiar or interested in some of those ideas I don't know what you'd think of it. And there's no "Gas the Kikes Race War Now Kill all Niggers and Fags" stuff in it, at least so far, I'm mostly done with it.
Christian Phillips
I guess to some up, it's good if you have an interest in propaganda and political movements, a lot of what he says could easily be applied to something that isn't Nazism. I think he has some valid things to say about group psychology too. I don't necessarily agree with a ton of the books content, he has a very cynical view of the "Aryan" (basically white) people but it's interesting.
Hunter Thompson
>a lot of what he says could easily be applied to something that isn't Nazism That is something I did learn, mostly through discussion of the Marxist Jew Saul Alinksy and his book Rules for Radicals, in which he strangely mentions Hitler as an example of the sort of political warfare which the Jewish Left would later adopt in America.
Evidently both Hitler and Alinsky were successful to some degree so this must make for some interesting reading.
Adrian King
Yeah from the small amount of that book I've read Mein Kampf did make me think of it. The position that whatever works is justified if it gets results
