Your cunt

>your cunt
>are you a leftist
Western "I care about elections and obama was great" """leftism""" doesn't count

Attached: karl.jpg (220x278, 24K)

I'm beginning to feel like a nazbol, nazbol

marxists deserve the rope

I don't believe in state sponsered misery.

no because I know my history

I'm a socialist. I just want all the kikes, welfarenogs and jihadi shitskins out
so I guess that makes me a Nazi

Flag
Yes
Class enemies to the wall

Yes
Can’t wait to line up the edgy fashies on this site against the wall

so why would someone be left wing nowadays

I just bought the Commie Manifest because it was 0.00$ on Kindle. I wonder what I'll think of it

let's just say that my views on most things are closer to the left than they are to the right (most of the time). mostly apolitical though

A mild one. Global capitalism is just getting more and more cancerous with each day.

>inb4 but it multiplies well! It works!
As I said, "cancerous".

Flag
No and I'll never be

Attached: image.jpg (434x432, 64K)

I am socialist, yes.

of course

you're no socialist sven

I see capitalism as a cancer that will eventually destroy the earth and the human soul, as it reaches its final stages. On the other hand, while I'd find socialism (as described by Marx, not ) much superior, I don't think you could get it to work as described, because people will always try to exploit it instead of embracing the ideology of it. Kind of makes it hard for me to care. So I guess I'm just crossing my fingers for the singularity to happen so we can be ruled by benevolent AI, which isn't really a legitimate political platform at the moment.

Allende tried to establish cyber-socialism in the 70s, look up Proyecto Synco. Back in the times of punchcards. Given how much computers have advanced since then, I believe socialist states with computer help will be viable in this century.

>because people will always try to exploit it instead
Yes, because it's a system where exploiting it gives you an edge, meaning the exploiters will very quickly rise to the top. It is therefore an inherently unstable and badly thought out system.

>muh AI rule
I agree, it is inevitable and it will be better than human rule if done right, but keep your idiotic notions of class warfare and onwning means of production out of it. It should just be a palace economy of an AI overseeing the distribution of force and resources as it sees fit according to some constraints like human comfort and personal freedom without any superficial trappings of outdated, irrelevant political systems slapped on to confuse it.

Marxism is too utopian and inferior to Natsoc in every way

Cheap toilet paper

I'm
MYSELF

The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. (c) Vladimir Vladimirovich Churchill

No, i hate marxists

I'm a typical eurocommunist

I believe that in a democracy equal rights are useless without equal (or similar) wealth

Natsoc is just as much a utopian fantasy as marxism, except it doesn't even have international appeal because half your platform is the promise of stealing farmland from your neighbours.

>Vladimir Vladimirovich Churchill
lel

gee I wonder why

Why do equal rights even matter? Why do you care that some richfag is richer than you? People are different, some will always be overachievers, some will always be swindlers and the great mass of people will always be apathetic sheep who are too dumb/weak to rise in society but also not dumb enough to fall so they just stay in the stratum they were born in. This was the same in the soviet union, except we had party positions and family connections rather than outright wealth.

Yes
Anti idpol and I’m proletariat for extra points

Used to be a commie in my late teens, but not anymore.
I lost all my faith in proletarians. We are going to be replaced by robots as soon as they can afford it

Well if you aren't a complete shithole the doctrine of natsoc is applicable onto your nation aswell

What have the democrats got to do with Marxism? You retard

No, I'm just liberal

The doctrine of natsoc is to kill 50% of my people and deport the rest. I'm afraid that's a shitty election platform.

A lot of them are marxists, except not the retarded autistic kind who still think 19th century bullshit like factory workers' revolutions is relevant in the affluent west.

Attached: HILLIESAUL.jpg (1050x750, 259K)

obviously my logic doesn't apply if you don't value human life, as you clearly don't

That's because you're a shithole that shouldn't exist in the first place. Or at the very least get a competent ruling class

>women who gives 400,000 speeches to wallstreet is a communist because she pretended to care about fag marriage
>implying hillary has principles of any kind

Are you being worked to death in an asbestos factory? Shut the fuck up you retard. Nobody is exploiting or oppressing you, you live better than 99% of humans who ever lived. This wasn't achieved by murdering all the richfags, it was achieved by gradually demanding shit from them and technological advances. Equal rights is just a legal construct, what non-autistic people really want is a better life.
See, this is why everybody hates Germany and thinks you should be exterminated. Clearly the world coming together and crushing you twice wasn't enough.

>principles
99% of communists are motivated by direct personal gain, envy, butthurt and dreams of glory. I've never met a communist who doesn't also have a few screws loose. What's your point?

me too. Fuck rich people and shitskins

incel hands typed this post

>99% of communists are motivated by direct personal gain, envy, butthurt and dreams of glory. I've never met a communist who doesn't also have a few screws loose. What's your point?
doubt it for the early ones. i would believe it for the ones after them though

>panana papers reveal the worlds wealthiest people are evading taxes by hiding their money in tax havens
>nothing happens
>paradise papers, once again, reveal even more rich people are evading taxes by hiding money in tax havens
>better give a tax cut to the rich
>infrastructure is falling apart while the 8 richest people have more wealth than the next 3 billion
Yeah, not seeing any problems here

Attached: 1508978441494.jpg (554x439, 63K)

I'm actually trying to say this as benevolent as possible. You would do much better with a germanic ruling class

wow deep

Attached: 457856896234754u83542.jpg (444x593, 206K)

Libertarian socialist gang where you at

its da refugees and africans and mexicans because some hasbara operative posting on rebbit told me

EU is actually cracking down hard on tax evasion. Also aren't most of these assets just shares in a company instead of actual, physical money?

That's why we can't allow a few people to own all the means of production while everyone else just lives on some kind of welfare or starve but consuming their shit at the same time

I'm ancap, so no

>Iraq
>Yes
Stalin did absolutely nothing wrong. Also RIP to my nigga Abdul Karim Qassim. Gone too soon

The early communists were factory workers fighting against inhuman working conditions and unlivable pay. They had a legitimate cause, even if their ideology was misguided. But a communist in the 21st century developed world is most likely a mentally ill faggot who got bullied in school and wants revenge, or just some beta cuck trying to get art hoe pussy. Art hoes themselves just treat ideology as a fashion accessory.

Pretty fucking scared of automation under capitalism
Funny how we're closer than ever before in human history to reduce work hours to near nothing and it's scary as shit

sorry m8, I don't want society to be ruled by a minority of people driven only by their interests. We will never achieve true democracy without eliminating economic inequalities

And? Does richfags exploiting vulnerabilities in the tax collection system somehow mean that life would be better after a brutal revolution and putting a set of far bloodthirstier opportunists in charge?

People with an iq of 115-130 should all be shot.

Fucking swiss mountain jews

We're doing the best under a Jewish ruling class, and so are you. Germans are dumb upstarts who are trying to go against the natural order of things.

Attached: fde.jpg (1197x854, 156K)

Agree. Hopefully the big corporations wont get away with it to the extent that they lower the life standard for everyone while getting richer themselvesi

Hillary has the same basic principle as Trump, really. That is, "making money"

what's wrong with this edgy latvian teenager? Ancap memes truly ruined gen Z

Why? How? What particular issues do you plan to fix? How will your system work? How will your system prevent corruption? How will the corruption preventing system prevent corruption in itself?

All communists are just idiots who don't understand the concept of recursion.

I don't have anything against ashkenazi jews. The financial system keeps the world in order but it could still be improved upon on individual, national grounds

>only jews are part of the ruling class
Cringe and bluepilled

>this is what neo-nazis believe

Attached: 1528744103772.png (1902x1180, 2.39M)

The guy's Russian living in Switzerland, not Swiss.
>ancap memes
Are you retareded? Take a look around you faggot, do you think literally everybody working in European governments is an ancap? I am simply not a dumb utopian idealogue like you. You don't understand that your system won't just work they way you wish it would, if anything can break, it will break. The goal is not a vulnerable system that strives for autistic perfection, it's a system that achieves sufficient prosperity without being susceptible to breaking in horrible and deadly ways.

As I said, people in the 115-130iq range should be shot. You are smart enough to absorb and regurgitate complex rhetoric and internally consistent logical systems but not smart enough to fully understand them or how they relate to the physical world.

It's not comparable. Jews historically didn't have a national interest because they didn't have a nation

t. 131 IQ

>muh IQ

cringe

Jews are the most dominant element in the western political ruling class, and it's a good thing.
>inb4
1%ers are not the ruling class. It's more like 0.01% of people in key positions in the financial, bureaucratic, media, intelligence, academia and military systems. The average porky millionaire has no more political sway than you do.

Nope
right wing Australian, becoming more right wing by the day.

i dont like both left and right, they're equally ignorant of anything behind the political scenes.

How predictable. If IQ is so bad why do all the shitters in the king of brainlets range act the same? Dumbos act on intuitive (training/instinctive) impulses, which are most of the time perfectly sufficient. Actual smart people can employ reason with the required care to produce accurate predictions. You think you're smart enough to let reason override intuition but then you horribly fail at application because your short term memory is insufficient to keep track of all the implicit assumptions you are making.

Attached: 1512323435891.jpg (3504x2337, 855K)

A system is a manifestation of the rules and laws which govern it. If it is autistically perfect, then it is not vulnerable since the system itself is inherently perfect.

Secondly, define prosperity.

I agree with the later part but there are still tons of chinks, americans, brits, frensh, germans and many more nationalities in the 0,01% that have huge influence. The jews alone can't be blame even though they are over represented

anyone else here /IWW/ ?

Attached: red card.jpg (549x897, 106K)

Used to be a hardcore marxist-leninist
Realised that the problem with it is that many proletarians are reactionary thus the dictatorship of the proletariat is flawed
also that productive forces are not sufficient to build socialism
also that marx's conclusions that socialism comes right after capitalism is flawed, especially due to automation
Now I just want to accelerate techno-capital under a global confederation of city states until we can reach the singularity and create fully automated luxury space communism

Can anyone explain to a brainlet what syndicalism is?

Attached: 1200px-Anarchist_flag.svg.png (1200x800, 3K)

Leftism is evil due to the social engineering it forcefully imposes upon people. I goes against evolution and therefore progress. Every individual needs to come to his own realization and those that refuse shall perish.

it's time to grow up kid

quick rundown?

Impossible while living in a cuckold society
(fake quote but still true)

Attached: 780945829369272.jpg (934x534, 123K)

>Anarcho-syndicalism (also referred to as revolutionary syndicalism)[1] is a theory of anarchism that views revolutionary industrial unionism or syndicalism as a method for workers in capitalist society to gain control of an economy and with that control influence in broader society. Syndicalists consider their economic theories a strategy for facilitating worker self-activity and as an alternative co-operative economic system with democratic values and production centered on meeting human needs.
Was huge in spain actually, until st*lin and then fr*nco fucked everything up

Attached: the lads.jpg (960x612, 76K)

I sympathise to it but I’m honestly more left centre, but in an unconventional way

Attached: 980768092340257.jpg (927x563, 61K)

Extreme richfag trust fund kiddie here. (family value is in the hundreds of millions)
Unless you're a richfag, if you are not a socialist, you're fucking yourself over and you're fucking retarded.
People like my parents, grandparents, family friends etc all 100% believe in a Marxian view of class warfare and a Marxian structure of society, but they view it from the opposite end, they view the proles as a dangerous mass that need to be manipulated and subjugated. My parents for example, 100% support all the bullshit authoritarian laws like banning websites, monitoring peoples internet usage, being able to tap into peoples phones without warrants etc etc not because they care about terrorism from groups like ISIS, but because they know the purpose of shit like that is to crack down on Proles when the next financial crisis happens and people take enmass in the streets.
Also fun fact, the law is applied vastly differently to people of my class than your class. For example, close family friend of my mothers has a meth head as a son, that methhead, went and king hit a guy out, hijacked a car and went on a joy ride. How long do you think he got? A year? 2 years? He got a warning after his father intervened. If you think the cops are going to be on the side of you proles when the next GFC happens, hahahaha you have another thing coming.
Why am I saying this shit if I'm also a richfag. Because I pretty much fucking hate everyone around me and climate change terrifies me and unless some better fucking AI centrally managed system comes along fast, I legit think society will collapse into a fucking nightmare world by 2050.

Attached: maxresdefault (1).jpg (1280x720, 130K)

I agree with most of his ideas but he stopped right before the finish line (natsoc) because he was jewish and didn't have a national idendity

>Natsoc is racist marxism meme
so tired of this shit tbqh

"Proletarians" are nothing but a made up herd that are too incompetent to really seize power.

Based insider

Attached: 0897456734589702.jpg (226x448, 66K)

Flag
I'm considered right even though my ideas are not really extreme and are mostly removing immigrants and making LGBT retards stop shouting that they don't have equal rights even though they can do everything except adopt children.

Fucking idiot. You can't practically make a perfect political system because the environment it has to exist in is so chaotic (consisting of millions or billions of incredibly chaotic systems of their own) that you cannot possibly account for every possible way an actor or a set of actors deliberately or unintentionally can break it.

So you design imperfect systems, that are designed to simply take a "hands off" approach to issues where attempting to control for an optimum is so computationally infeasible that you're more likely to break shit than fix it. Systems that fully understand that there are going to be actors who try and succeed at breaking the system, and are designed (or more often, evolved over time) to fail in ways that aren't too destructive.

The very act of trying to design a perfect political system from first principles is doomed to fail. It's much better to stay open and flexible and deal with problems as and when they emerge rather than trying to predict and account for everything in a rigid set of rules. But sure, I believe that your super special brand of communism will totally work this time!
Blame for what? Jews are only to blame for the developed world no longer being a war torn shithole with bigger groups like the Germans just up and genociding smaller ones to grab their land.
>the problem is that many proletarians are reactionary
No, the problem is that your system is inherenrly unstable due to game theory and making patently false assumptions about the human decision making process.

Attached: [Some-Stuffs]_Jojo's_Bizarre_Adventure_Stardust_Crusaders_22_(1280x720_Blu-Ray_AAC)_[96AA501A]. (1280x720, 104K)

>commie
>telling others to grow up
I was a commie too, when I was like 16. It's something you grow out of if you-=÷ not retarded

Any way you could prove you're a richfag? This is how I've always thought the rich were like, it'd give me some piece of mind to know someone in their sphere can confirm my suspicions.

The social doctrine wasn't the same but the financial one was very similar

Ah yes, allying oneself with the bourgeoisie and defending private property is marxist financial doctrine

this is his best qoute, muricans don't seem to get this