I rarely if ever have an inner dialogue and I can say with certainty I'm smarter and more spiritual than most people I...

I rarely if ever have an inner dialogue and I can say with certainty I'm smarter and more spiritual than most people I know, including poltards.

I speak 3 languages fluently but even still intelligence is wired to be mostly spacial rather than verbal. My brain does not think in language but pure abstract concepts and I verbalize when needed. Anyone who bases their worldview on a couple of shaky studies that shills have been anxiously memeing these last few days is either a shill or a gullible fool.
Thanks that is all

Attached: 1536271818960.png (586x578, 37K)

Other urls found in this thread:

clickventures.clickhole.com/you-re-a-computer-can-you-pass-the-turing-test-1825124355
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>t. NPC
enjoy your slavery goyim :-)

Attached: 1536328672603.png (264x274, 30K)

>I can say with certainty I'm smarter and more spiritual than most people I know, including poltards.
My dad worked at the world trade center

My intelligence is wired to be mostly spacial**

Everyone is different

can you define what an abstract concept is?

God damn you're still on about this? Move on already.

>I am more spiritual
>I am smarter
>THAN Jow ForumsTARDS
>SPACIAL
Lol no

The pure objective concept of what it is. People who speak multiple languages may understand more.

So let's say in English the word is book
And German it's bunch
And French it's liver

The objective concept of what the thing is is how I think of it. I don't say "book" in my head.

Lmao autocorrect fucked up the foreign words but you get the point

Eng = book
Germans = Buch
French = Livre

oh okay, so your mind works like a storage unit that has been crammed full of nick nacks.

Lol that’s not what abstract concepts are.

wut is tho?

Right, my brain takes those and abstracts them into a sort of meta-concept that doesn't require language. This is semantics I know you understand what I mean.

can you example?

I did here

so do you just picture a book? or is it more like imagining a 4D hell-raiser Tesseract?

itt: the type of nigga that eats dog food because he read its nutrient profile is healthier for his meta-conceptual mind

>NPC babbling intensifies

What user refers to in Is a concrete noun. Not an abstract noun. Abstract generally refers to things that are not quantifiable where’s matters concrete, such as a book or a tree or a faggot, such as OP, are.
OP is either using words and concepts he doesn’t understand, is a complete poofter,or both.
Try using a fucking dictionary. I recommend the oxford concise

I guess you can imagine it as I actually see a book in my head without thinking the word book. Now scale this principal to entire ideas and that's how I think. I only use language when communicating externally.

I do however speak kind of clunky and fast and people have a hard time understanding me sometimes so this may be a drawback to this kind of brain "wiring". Anyway this is all speculation because even the best and brightest minds in neuroscience have no fucking clue what consciousness is. A lot of research lies ahead of us before we can make bold claims like HURR PPL BE NPCs

That's a psyop meant to divide us

that`s a lot of W`s

t. p-zombie

You’re dialled off your fucking skull aren’t you.

He's been exposed as part of the simulation and butt hurt.

Attached: NPC.gif (407x352, 190K)

oh okay
what would an idea look like for you?

see it's not that i care how your brain is wired but why do you need to express it in such an insufferable way

> I'm smarter and more spiritual
yet you had to come brag and make yourself feel superior, making it clear you don't know what spirituality is about.
fuck off npc

Hahaha. user, I won't say you're incompetent, but you simply don't get it. You are almost there, but you'll never make that last leap. Try to forget all this and go back to enjoying a mundane life.

He experiences concepts as qualia directly, not through language (which eventually produces qualia as well)

please stop

Attached: retard.png (800x729, 48K)

yo my sides have left the universe

Right he gets that you “abstract concepts” but he is asking you to define what an “abstract concept” is.. and the answer is not the semantic data in your mind that corresponds to objects in reality

Attached: EF8D7A09-5D33-41F3-BF64-6ABE2DA39718.jpg (903x960, 62K)

You kept asking how my brain works and I told you my thinking on how my brain works?

Why are verbals always so wildly jealous of us...

so like a mental synesthesia, where other parts of the brain are picking up to compensate for a lacking internal verbalization?

You wanker, you tried to explain how your own brain works and used terms that prove your brain doesn’t work you thought it does, or any other brain for that matter.
I’ve never been jealous of an amoeba who claims he knows how his or any other amoebas’ brain works, because they don’t have the, or the ability to make such a claim .
It’s a bitter pill to swallow, so to soften the blow, here is a pair of tits

Attached: E733EAD7-16A7-4365-8A67-CF8FDA2B25F5.jpg (480x640, 56K)

Wrong pic

Attached: 7BFDD030-CB6F-4403-8698-B3E87D423690.jpg (1536x812, 1.16M)

Kek the NPC Wojak is worthy of being spread like a disease

Haha in your fit of rageful sperging you've revealed yourself to be a sad jealous verbal IQ Jewish shill. I responded to the American flag poster not the aussie you fucking dolt.
>Inb4 I change my ip for security

Nice ip shapeshifting faggot

is this not platonic thought, regarding the true form of an idea, and that language is a mere descriptor for said true form (or is that shit aristotle?)

Don't worry about it. I'm a mensa fag and I don't think in language either. It's a waste of processing power unless you're planning on sharing the context of your thoughts to an audience.

okay but is there not an underlying symbology or form to concepts, that language "brings about" or manifests into the objective realm?

Lol. Wut

but yea, i guess the mensa folk are saying , they think in these primordial archetypal symbols rather than the language itself that humans have developed to describe said primordial archetypal symbols

it seems to be that some people's minds work mostly off visualization while others function primarily with auditory or verbal. there must also be those who can do both or at least a spectrum of the two.

i stand in direct contact with the platonic forms and i can tell you, it's not.

>Muh 3 languages, dude fuck off, i speak english most of the time because of my job and my inner voice is Italian because i studied there for 6 years.
>Just speaks
>Non essential NPC
Pathetic

I am bilingual. My inner voice often switching between languages and sometime even uses both at once. A single sentence using words from both languages. It's always there tho.

>being bound by language in your thought
>Certain languages like Chinese are literally speculated to be the cause for the lack of creative thinking in these peoples
>I'm pathetic
Hmmmm

Attached: 1535263577826.png (1100x644, 89K)

The point isn't that your brain isn't functioning. The point is that you aren't a conscious being.

Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is debunked jewish bullshit

devs, please nerf OP's autism

Attached: 1535876497437.jpg (498x497, 138K)

Thanks for the info. You got me there I don't know enough about it. Let's all agree we don't know how the brain works and everyone's intelligences have their advantages and disadvantages and put this shill NPC meme to rest.

How do you formulate coherent arguments if not with language? Language gives our thoughts structure and clarity. From what you've described it seems like there's just a bunch of random abstract ideas floating around in your head.

Haha I guess so. I consider myself creative and I wouldn't have it any other way.

user, think of your brain as an Os or a .exe. Your brain will assign an object a tag with attributes, such as (woman, probably long hair with tits) and you file that away for reference. This is not abstract thinking. Classification is done on a concrete basis. If you’ve seen another quality that is less easily classifiable, such as how moving, graceful, emotionally compelling *.objectks characteristics actions or attributes are, then we might be talking abstract. You’re a fucking brainlet.

And to answer your first question I honestly don't know. It just works. It's almost like an aether I draw information from and I just intuitively know how it works.

This. Thinking verbally just slow you down. You should learn how to silence your inner voice if you want to be more efficient if anything. If you do that you'll be much faster at aquiring informations

I'm also super disorganized and I feel like I have ADD but though practice I have gotten better at focusing my mind on one thing. Again, advantages and disadvantages

>I'm smurt XDDD

You have failed the paradox of intelligence, firstly. Secondly, knowing a language is not a sign of intelligence but how you articulate yourself in a language is, no matter how "fluent" you really are. Third and foremost, an intellect wouldn't make such blanketing statements such as yours.

You talk like a freshman straight out of highschool thinking you're hot shit on a college campus, but really every one thinks you are talking out of your ass and you need to buckle down and be more humble.

t. Idiot

Lmao you are a fucking brainlet .

Attached: image.jpg (207x243, 21K)

Everyone can silence their inner voice
The issue is that some people can't use it at all

I hated this dumb fucking meme at first but it's paying dividends now

Metaphysical concept. The state of objective existence. It doesn't require a language. I haven't read this study myself, but based on the cascade it's having here, I would assume that it doesn't draw any distinction between hypothetical abstraction/causative prediction and those who simply exist reacting to causality itself.

Complete the linked test
clickventures.clickhole.com/you-re-a-computer-can-you-pass-the-turing-test-1825124355

I did it and I failed.
Undone by the fucking AUSSIE POSTER. Yes, you've revealed my true identity to be Zogbot. The Israeli AI designed to destroy Jow Forums.

Kneel now before me puny humans

Attached: maxresdefault (1).jpg (1280x720, 172K)

not smart enough to use proper punctuation.

>Wasting your energy on verbalizing your thoughts
>Wasting your ATP worrying about punctuation on Jow Forums

Verbies will never learn will they? The point is to transmit data without losing information in the process. Language, however perfectly punctual, is a great way of doing this but it is not explicitly required.

Kira Yoshikage just wants a quiet life.

Jesus Christ, you didn’t actually click it did you?

Okay clearly youre a verbal cuck too because neither of you see what I am getting at. I'm using terms like abstract concept loosely because this is exactly what the fuck I'm talking about. I don't think like yall so verbalizing what I am thinking is hard and doesn't always fit into my immediate knowledge of the English language. Especially when I'm making on the fly shitposts on Jow Forums on my phone.

If you want the literal precise exact definition of an "abstract concept" Google it you fuckwit

Attached: 1535190021788m.jpg (904x1024, 137K)

>perfectly punctual
>doesn’t know what punctual means
>claims to be super genius

Lmaoing my ass off

Attached: rabbit.png (1151x887, 1.11M)

same

rustling shills' jimmies is fun

>I am using a word I don’t understand to represent a concept I dont understand, and I am unable to define a concept and therefore ask you to define it for me, even tho I will ignore your completely correct definition and continue being a fuckwit

Okay I'll make a new term and call it an uber-concept just for your sake verbie. Words truly are objective, concrete, and absolute. Feel safe again?

No. You fucked up again.

>I'm smarter and more spiritual than most people I know, including poltards.
Jow Forumstards are smart now?