Raw Images From NASA’s Curiosity Rover Show UFOs Hovering In Mars Sky

When are they finally going to tell us the truth about ayylmaos? Humanity is obviously ready. Why are they holding back?

>A few astonishing pictures located in the archive section of mars.jpl.nasa.gov, an official United States government website, were discovered Monday evening.
>The black and white photos show strange UFO-like objects floating in the air not too far off the ground and are said to have originated from NASA’s car-sized Curiosity Rover, which launched from Cape Canaveral on November 26th, 2011 and landed in Mars’ “Gale Crater” on August 6th, 2012.

latenighthour.com/nasa-mars-ufo

Attached: 1.png (1610x1067, 1.07M)

Other urls found in this thread:

mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00688/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_458574869EDR_F0390444NCAM00295M_.jpg
mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00369/opgs/edr/rcam/RLB_430259923EDR_F0130000RHAZ00311M_.JPG
mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00370/opgs/edr/rcam/RLB_430346071EDR_F0130292RHAZ00311M_.JPG
cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85-00821R000100110007-7.pdf
mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00184/mcam/0184MR0925102000E1_DXXX.jpg
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052819/NASA-raids-Dennys-Joann-Davis-74-tries-sell-Neil-Armstrong-moon-dust.html
telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
theguardian.com/science/2009/jul/16/moon-landing-tapes-erased
youtube.com/watch?v=o1S0oObHT0c
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA16204.jpg
mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00688/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_458574869EDR_F0390444NCAM00295M_.JPG
thehiddenmission.com/wholelotoffaking/goingon/terrifyingheadfoundonmars.html
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/181850540/
mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg
mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/3954/1P479207643ESFCM29P2377L5M1.JPG
m.youtube.com/watch?v=NkUTGpegZN0
de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coatlicue
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Attached: 2.jpg (1024x1024, 439K)

Attached: 3.jpg (1024x1024, 458K)

Attached: 4.png (864x784, 436K)

Attached: 5.jpg (1024x1024, 417K)

Attached: 6.png (2028x1100, 1.77M)

It’s fucking swamp gas faggot

Bump

mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00688/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_458574869EDR_F0390444NCAM00295M_.jpg

mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00369/opgs/edr/rcam/RLB_430259923EDR_F0130000RHAZ00311M_.JPG

mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00370/opgs/edr/rcam/RLB_430346071EDR_F0130292RHAZ00311M_.JPG

Awfully angular horizon don't you think?

>can easily see the curvature of mars in these photos

>earth completely flat

hmmmm

Attached: 1523161028245.png (1280x720, 1.41M)

Attached: 1532677003769.png (1280x740, 1.13M)

>GUISE ITS UFOS
>posts 100 images of blurry as shit images that could literally be anything
Every. Fucking. Time.

Its a big BURB .
Stellar SeaEagle .
NASA is not on Mars thats an island off the coast of Greenland.
I truly appreciate your enthusiasm but ..
NASA =Biggest liars on the planet

This is undeniably true, the Mars photos are very clearly from Devon Island. How do spacetards deal with this piece of cognitive dissonance?

Attached: 1514957926109.jpg (716x812, 160K)

Could be anything from lens flare to a reflection of the inversion layer manifesting itself as a shape in the sky, happens all the time.

Nice shilling...

Attached: 8247cc0fddd5b12f5dae0b497f5b290f19a7cd4398449afbdcce431034d2b360.jpg (945x680, 636K)

Attached: 1531996412914.jpg (3072x2048, 810K)

LOOK AT ALL THOSE STARS

WHY WERE THERE NO STARS OUT DURING THE MOON LANDING? WHY CAN WE SEE STARS FROM MARS

Attached: 36781634_10156158461036195_8782046151277805568_n.jpg (710x960, 86K)

why would ufo do that?
just stand on a desert planet and look after a retarded drone?

This here states on page 7 that NASA basically is just the public sector of the military spaceprogram and pretty much underlies it making me think its even more likely that NASA is mostly just a front to cover up the military program
cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85-00821R000100110007-7.pdf

Why hasnt this (pic related with adjusted contrast and brightness) been closer looked at? This very well could indicate that at one point there was sophisticated life on Mars, yet they seem to just ignore it. Here is the original pic from the NASA website
mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00184/mcam/0184MR0925102000E1_DXXX.jpg

Attached: 0CDEEB3E-827A-4209-8A8D-AE70F10E6B24.jpg (600x485, 77K)

Lens Flare.

Better grab a copy quick. The scrub everything good people find, it magically disappears.

appearently NASA gets really pissed when trying to sell a moonrock
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052819/NASA-raids-Dennys-Joann-Davis-74-tries-sell-Neil-Armstrong-moon-dust.html
this one stated they let the old lady pee herself and sit in the pee for quite some time just because of some moon"rock"

However considdering this about the moonrocks
telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
It may explain why they are so furious about it

Also im not saying we didnt go to the moon, nor that we cant go into space or anything like that. All im saying is they arent showing is real footage, or at least often not real footage. Some possible reasons:
>van allen belt would have destroyed the tapes either way, and a moonlanding without footage wouldnt be good propaganda
>they feared it could go wrong and thus made fake footage in order to cover an eventual failure up and still sell it as success
>something is on the moon we arent supposed to know about
>we really didnt go to the moon

at the very least it seems they dont want anyone to look into the tapes
theguardian.com/science/2009/jul/16/moon-landing-tapes-erased

and the astronauts dont seem like people that are mentally stable enough to be send into space
youtube.com/watch?v=o1S0oObHT0c

Also what is that in pic related?
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA16204.jpg

Attached: 9A1FD108-9A87-4AF5-987D-AEC79A624AC1.jpg (2718x1536, 2M)

That’s a bird.

it's fucking saturn you retard. you can see it because mars is closer to it than earth.

Why are pictures of shit like this always shitty and blurry?

When they send something into space why dont they give it the best cameras money can buy? Why does everything look like a picture taken with a cellphone from 2001?

simulationism is just another form of theism, but flat earthers rarely use the word "might"

Pic related, something flying around on mars, and again just ignored
mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00688/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_458574869EDR_F0390444NCAM00295M_.JPG

Attached: E8291323-E21B-4DE1-8F23-E22154CC5FCD.jpg (1017x543, 69K)

That’s only flares,.... military maneuver. Go back to bed. Nothin to see here.

but there's little black and white dots everywhere on these images how can you make a conclusion at all?

thehiddenmission.com/wholelotoffaking/goingon/terrifyingheadfoundonmars.html

In here all i have on nasa faking shit
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/181850540/

pic related again zoomed in and altered contrast and brightness
mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg

Attached: D32CDAC9-888C-46C3-8282-4F1A96E1AE86.jpg (1968x1127, 361K)

what is dead pixels?

jews are behind this
jews and their german lapdogs

Conspiracy theories belong in /x/. Also nice black dots in grainy images.

broke: it's UFOs xDDD
woke: aliens aren't fucking real and any "reveal" of them is a literal psyop

t. Ayy

one is founded in statistical probability, the other is founded in being retarded.

You should absolutely consider ending yourself.

It was likely completed around 9 years ago, so camera technology from then.
Plus power and bandwidth requirements will limit their camera selection.

Attached: 1516515266343.jpg (1190x859, 74K)

explain?

pic related
mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/3954/1P479207643ESFCM29P2377L5M1.JPG
is this some ram?

>government organization lying to the public is paranormal and not political
K

Attached: E8A38A5D-D644-4FD3-BE18-5019FFA88ECB.jpg (625x1024, 111K)

this proves...?

Attached: 1523425805073.webm (720x480, 817K)

Attached: 1509345100942.webm (720x480, 2.71M)

When you look with a telescope thst is out of focus at stars you get the wobbly ones at the bottom, together with the atmospheric distortion it is kind of flickering making them claim its actually because there is water in between

>mars doesnt have dust storms all the fucking time
It could be literally anything. I thought Germans were logical and pragmatic. What the fuck is wrong with you.

that's a weather balloon you dumb fuck

>statistical probability

What a weird way to say unfounded speculation

Are people really this fucking stupid in the US? What the hell is wrong with your education when people start thinking dust/dead pixels/faulty sensor is fucking UFOs

Fucking brainlets make me furious.

BIRB

>Are people really this fucking stupid in the US?

Yes. They think the earth is flat too. Idiots watch too much tv.

Fake, it should be flat

What should be around that big on mars thst is not a rock when all its supposed to be dust and rock. Also the atmosphere is much less dense leading to the wind having much less power behind meaning the thing mus be even lighter to be blown up by the wind

AYO HOL UP
how the fuck are they seeing the curvature of the entire planet? even with a fish eye lens?

Flat earth retards. Every fucking time.

Attached: 2018-09-16_20-48-23.png (1218x468, 147K)

Fucking signed.

>saturn
>In front of a mountain

Attached: 1536895491171.jpg (639x722, 73K)

da fuq

This is the only interesting one.

When did you find this?

Humanity is obviously NOT ready. I would smite the world before I let a civ controlled by some greedy child killing apes start colonizing the Galaxy.

Dust in the lens

Bad pixels nigger

Attached: marsroverselfie.png (1011x464, 141K)

weather balloon

kubrick didn't have cgi back then

I want to belive

2-3 years ago i saw it the first time, the source i could dig up about a year ago

Maybe jupiter. It has a ring too iirc and is closer. Also it looks like
m.youtube.com/watch?v=NkUTGpegZN0

Made on earth?
de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coatlicue

Attached: 770B0022-D845-483A-9472-B9D1221E3803.jpg (795x1258, 387K)

not a flatard but imo it's not the curvature of Mars but the wide camera angle, fisheye type.

#marsattacks

Attached: lenswipes.jpg (1014x581, 57K)

Looks like a compression error tbqh senpai

yeah it looks like some blacked pixels.

Attached: 1523947392700.jpg (600x450, 43K)

Nerve gas

it's obviously a space jew on a rare trip to the surface

because mars is actualy made of cheese and 10 m diameter

Bump

Yes, it does look like some ratlike creature

god damn it

The black fly is burucku hussein Mohammed obunga.

Spaceniggers.....

mars is smaller than the Earth

>camera has dirt and dead spots on the sensor because it’s been banging around on fucking Mars for years and years falling over rocks and off cliffs with almost no atmosphere and jagged shit flying around
>chunks of data are missing because it’s beaming data across 8 billion miles of space with neutrinos and positrons flying around in the data stream
wow look at those black dots they must be big dick alieums from the Pleiades

man i wish i had a pool that big

It only seems that way because it's so far away.

for fuck sakes burger

Fuck these "fake NASA" and "flat Earth" shills. They're literally useful idiots for these black budget projects. Anytime any discussion of Advanced Aerial Threats takes place, the whole thread is derailed without even engaging the OP. Disclosure is coming whether you want it to or not.

Attached: 1536771277577.jpg (720x699, 44K)

was gonna post this

Probably worried morons will communicate with the aliens then a month later we're all slaves with alien overlords

Attached: test.jpg (1968x1127, 407K)

>send Rover to dusty planet
>"Gee whiz, I wish with all this fancy engineering, we had also thought of some way to clean the camera lens. Oh well."

Attached: 1531107265010.jpg (1024x1024, 659K)

It's a super-duper fisheye because it needs to see as much as possible.

Such as what, jackass? A can of compressed air?

>jupiter
>in front of a mountain

Attached: 1523829898318m.jpg (1024x576, 38K)

Are you implying they sent it to a planet with huge dust storms without any consideration of the camera on the damn thing? Are you also retarded?

Attached: 1536974712186.jpg (960x878, 74K)

Give me an answer of what you can do to clean of the camera lense that doesn’t need replenishing. You seem to have a clue.

shills are going to have really bad times the coming months.

hope they like jail