This thread is about the appreciation of horology, as well as the micro-engineering and materials engineering that are required to make a fine watch, clock, or other timepiece.
What would you recommend as a low key every day watch under 40mm and under 200? I have an SNK809 I really like but I'm looking to branch out. Would be worn with a leather strap most likely. First time posting here pls no bully.
Colton Cox
Yeah I find I can't wear them without them looking like they're choking my wrist underneath, even if it's fitting correctly. If I loosen it one notch to make it look normal, then it slides around on the wrist and looks stupid. Two piece straps or bracelets are far superior for larger wrists.
Jackson Morales
Get a nato strap. They have a smaller profile and look better. Alternatively, get a nice metal strap, or a synthetic one if thats your thing.
I like Grand Seiko, but Archie is right that they are not really comparable to the big 3. they are more at Rolex's level since both make high end mass production watches
>Japanese horology edition I'll be honest, I still don't get the new VFA. Even putting Rolex aside (since they don't have to deal with a smooth balance), a 4 second range guarantee was achieved by at least GP, Zodiac, and Longines with regulated balance movements, more than forty years ago, in production, accessible prices.
Sure I can acknowledge that even making a mechanical watch whose ethos is high accuracy is a bold move these days (whereas it wasn't at that time), and we can probably say something about how Seiko is surely actually going to produce watches much better than spec. But if multiple manufacturers were hitting the same tolerances half a century ago, with regulated balances, I really wish Seiko had managed to push this edition a little further.
Grand Seiko is most directly comparable to JLCs production models in terms of external and movement finishing. This is below the haute hotlogerie standard that dress watch from ALS, PP, or VC should be at, but of course modern entry level Patek models are now regularly accused of failing to live up to that standard. A VC or ALS dress watch certainly will live up to it though, and that standard is on another level than a series produced watch.
Honestly buying a Grand Seiko in gold is silly anyway as steel and platinum show off Grand Seiko's external finishing much better anyway.
What makes penisquartz better than any other quartz?
Carter Sanders
> $110 Now, maybe manufacturers could guarantee 60spm back then because fewer people had access to a good timing signal - I've certainly read that about that 60spm guarantee on the accutron and the 60spy guarantee on the early quartzes, like Beta 21 and Longines 6512. But at least looking at the (original 1967) chronometer test results for my HF make it seem like if that were true, it could only have been a little bit true, as the results make it seem like 2spd on the wrist would have been very likely achieved.
you wear them on the outside of your jacket in the military
Dylan Hughes
The 001, 003, and 005 were the best by far.
Jaxson Morales
best poorfag watch? under $30
Isaac Carter
First, keep in mind that marketing copy used to be a lot more...boastful than you would get away with today and that few customers would have had the means to really test the +/- 2 SPD mean daily variation ratings that were guaranteed for a few models back then.
Plus, the 34 day testing regimen that Grand Seiko is subjecting the new VFA to is likely closer to old Astronomical Observatory Chronometer standards than just a +/- 2 SPD rating, otherwise the additional 18 days of testing over normal models wouldn't be necessary. Also keep in mind that GS tests to 6 positions rather than the usual 5, and that mean daily variation is not the only measure of timing performance and that we don't know just how far Daini is taking their autism in other measures. Modern movements typically crush pre-quartz ones in terms of thermal variance and variance based on power reserve, for example.
I would be shocked if the modern VFA wasn't able to soundly beat the timing performance of all the previous quarts +/- 2 SPD watches barring the Astronomical Observatory Chronometer from GP and Daini itself.
Sure. I guess this basically boils down to "old movements that claimed 2spd on the wrist may have underperformed that, and the new VFA that claims 2spd (centered at +1) will likely outperform". Would be nice if we had more information on what the testing criteria were.
Is there a reason to not go analog in that price range?
Nicholas Morgan
Nope. SARB031. If Seiko ever confirms the 6L35 as a drop in replacement for the 6R and offers an ebauche of it, I will legitimately buy a SARB031 and put a 6L in it.
No, you could always get a pope watch, if you want to look like a disgusting papist.
Hunter Green
Yeah, they will probably eventually reveal them. If they do a steel VFA next year for the 50th anniversary of the VFA label, they'll probably tout the specifics of the regimen.
Also note that you will probably never see another watchmaker even attempt to adjust a smooth balance movement to this kind of level in today's market. The amount of highly skilled labor you have to throw at each movement in both adjustment and testing would be considered prohibitive by everyone else when you could just go with a free sprung balance instead.
Elijah Brown
That looks terrible, what a shitty case.
Anthony Martin
looks boring and shitty
Blake Howard
Whelp, I guess you hate 1960s dress watches as a genre then. The SARB031 even has a domed acrylic crystal.
There's nothing more yawn inducing than a plain round case with thin, straight lugs. Grammar of design was the greatest thing that ever happened to seiko and I don't have any interest in going back to the designs before it.
Ryan Baker
Not that guy, but maybe you can get a better view from the side
i bought this fonr shit and giggles, its utter shit
Daniel Sanchez
I never thought I'd come across someone who was even more of a grammar of design fanboy than I am. I just also happen to like 1960s dress watches as a genre and don't mind Seiko making the occasional watch in a different stylistic genre.
Alexander Scott
Really? Break easily or not keep time? Either way it was only 10 bucks You kinda pay in the waiting time though
Jace Sanchez
It's not a fake. It's a blank diver. It's not sold as pretending to be a rolex
Christian Gutierrez
I removed the prongs from all of my zulu straps and just use the loops to tighten it, no predetermined lengths so I can tighten it to exactly what I want
Ian Smith
just looks very rough. and cant fucking read the hands at all.
Is it wise/worth upgrading anything on the SKX beyond the bracelet? I have a strapcode oyster on the way.
I'm thinking of getting someone to put on a 4r36, sapphire and ceramic insert. Or should i save the money towards buying a non-shitter later on?
Ethan Robinson
It won't make it more valuable. If you have the passion and don't mind putting extra money into a Honda Civic, then go for it if it will make you enjoy it more. Just know what it is and isn't.
Robert Allen
I fiddle around with my Amphibia putting new parts in, but this is mostly just for fun and I don't delude myself into thinking its worth the money
Jackson Lopez
6 KB 6 KB PNG I'm gonna put 4 leds parallel in my f-91w and maybe 1 onto the alarm circuit
Where do you buy your Casio watches? They are expensive on eBay
Levi Sanchez
looking online now and it looks similar to this SRPB69J but with the old cursive "Automatic" and silver hands I don't think its fake but I don't know the exact model
I don't think so but I'm not an expert the caseback is open and the 4R36A movement looks identical to my other watches with 4R36B everything else about it looks very solid which doesn't fit with most cheapo Seiko fakes
Gabriel Phillips
The day being blue like that is reserved for Saturday. And the hands look wrong. It says 4r36-03e2 on the dial but closest thing it looks like is the SARY055. Sorry seems fake.
Aiden Foster
it is Saturday today, I just set it to Japanese days
Alexander Diaz
Post more vintage divers.
Easton Garcia
Here's a photo of the movement Looks the same as my other Seikos with 4R
changing/re-applying lume seems like quite an involved process and easy to damage hands/indices etc. Do many places offer the service?
Brayden Anderson
that's too bad then, I liked the look of it, at least it didn't cost very much
Nathaniel Davis
desu I might just keep it reguardless I also saw a black one that looked similar to the SARY057 which I might check out but if it's the same sort of thing as this I'll just keep the one I have and maybe stick it on a leather strap
Small boned wristlet here. I asked in quite a few threads but I still don't have a definite answer. I need a goddamn watch that won't look huge on my shitty small wrist. My wrist circumference is just under 17cm (that would be around 6 inches).
Depends on the bezel and how cluttered the dial is. I have a 6.5" wrist and would have no problem wearing a 42mm Speedmaster professional because they wear small and it suits the style. For a plain dialed watch with small bezel 36-38mm fits far better.
Joseph Sanders
Literally anything will do, as long as it's small and not an eyesore like pic related.