third for there's nothing to solve it's fucking random
Elijah Evans
no
Colton Nguyen
Posting to find out my team.
Aaron Young
Fourth for it could be GETs.
Jose Gray
Bump for outdated scores while I iron out a bug! >Peep +172 >Creme +93 >Mini +65 >Chocolate +176 >Peanut Butter +102
Carson Brooks
yes
Jeremiah Hall
I'm pretty sure the number of points assigned is based on the number of repeating digits you get in your post number. Dubs=2pts Trips=3pts etc.
Lucas Gutierrez
Why is Peanut Butter lagging behind so horribly?
Xavier Butler
I would not consider that the score is determined by times a certain team is mentioned. The pattern of grow doesn't suit the board reactions, e. see Chocolate winning over Mini. A lot of anons have pointed out that it may be RNG due to the mean of scores, this type of method also fits the April joke bias >Number of dubs or gets (multiplied when trips or higher, this could explain the score differences) >Images posted >Threads created >Words in a post divided by a constant
Eli Cooper
Why doesn't 4chanx let you center threads without some other shit extension. It's not fucking fair just build it into 4chanx you lazy fags.
Zachary Miller
seriously what is this shit
Kayden Murphy
There will statistically be less Peanut Butter users.
Angel Sullivan
>brainlets cant into modulus we need mandatory Jow Forums summer school
Hunter Turner
Okay, think I fixed it. Here's the latest scoop, fresh out the botnet! >Peep +85 >Creme +117 >Mini +182 >Chocolate +34 >Peanut Butter +51 Holy shit, congrats Mini!
Brody Wilson
Any quads/quint for mini?
Mason Campbell
stop mentioning m*ni everyone
Landon Fisher
FUCK OFF MINI FAGGOTS THIS IS OUR YEAR
Leo Wright
Hey, I'm just reporting scores. A big diff merits a congrats, no? Unless it's RNG, in which case congrats to the "random" circuitry on the servers running Jow Forums!
Isaiah Powell
For some reason the number of searches for creme in here find.Jow Forums.org/?q=creme divided by 5 gives a very close number for the number of points in Team Creme, not the case for the other teams though.
When the update happened , it was 28017/5 = 5603 while the counter currently says 5668.
Juan Rogers
...
Levi Johnson
There's no way, the number isn't going up fast enoungh for all boards at once.
Jayden Hernandez
Newfag to Jow Forums, /x/ told me Jow Forums found the answer
So can I get an quick rundown? Seems to me like a cheap psy-op 'cause something is happening somewhere.
Josiah Butler
Read OP to see how the teams are assigned, then help us figure out how points are awarded.
John Gray
btfo
Charles Howard
Team is assigned based on your IP, scores are probably random but nothing has been confirmed there.
Benjamin Bailey
wouldn't it be bizarre if each team had a different way of generating points?
David Ortiz
Just google what is my ipv4 address take the last two digits add them together and then take the result modulo 5, the corresponding number is your team.
Jace Baker
Good luck in hacking the gates, Jow Forums.
Matthew Russell
I was about to say that would be inherently unfair, but mods are faggots anyway so it might be possible. Mods should just leave already.
Thomas Butler
Lmaooo bodied
Jonathan Adams
>Team Chocolate lost 10 points for this post
Parker Gomez
X amount points per time, several point system, get % between All teams and teams get X * %Team
Easton Sanchez
Should keep an eye on it that's close enough. What would be uncommon enough for pe*nut butter to get that low?
Lincoln Hughes
el psy congroo
Xavier Sullivan
>solving with peeps might as well fund africa
Christian Ross
if that were the case the results should be more equal assuming each team is posting equally currently peanut butter in 5th is 469 behind chocolate while chocolate is only 223 behind peep in 1st so unless PB are significantly under posting that shouldn't be the cause...
Lincoln Johnson
Time to find out what team I am.
Logan Bennett
Sorry sweety Chocolate will prevail mods know Chocolate is superior, keep getting cucked by mods on other boards.
Camden Reed
>>Team is based on last two Octets of public IPv4 address.
>ipv4 >2018
what a joke.
Luis Sanders
they wouldn't drink my creme cum to gain our blessing
Jace Wright
New Scores! >Peep +197 >Creme +30 >Mini +95 >Chocolate +59 >Peanut Butter +47 Congrats to Peep for the big diff!
Jace Anderson
x ~ dig boards.Jow Forums.org aaaa @2001:1608:10:25::1c04:b12f
I'm pretty sure it's whoever if a thread reaches bump limit the OP's team gets a point, no idea how to check this.
Bentley Flores
born to suffer
Jonathan Thompson
Couldn't say, but it'd be impressive if they found 5 different sets of arbitrary qualifiers that could keep things this close.
Jonathan Sullivan
for fucks sake come on cremes we almost beat the peeps spread our creme cum
Adam Lopez
There aren't that many threads reaching bump limit, so very unlikely.
Chase Barnes
Peanut butter and chocolate are harder to type than creme peep and mini
Zachary King
score based on whichever team sees more ads
Isaiah Murphy
If the mention theory is correct no one wants to type out such a long team name. The others are fairly short. Also being last doesn't help, because people will rage mention you less.
Jason Hernandez
Rolling for team since I only have an ipv6 address currently
Chase Butler
>since I only have an ipv6 address currently Riddle me this: How do you post on 4chin?
Mason Wilson
That would explain why chocolate and peanut butter are in last place. Still, the score numbers seem kind of low for how big Jow Forums is and how long this has been live, so maybe it's not 1 mention = 1 point?
Kevin Miller
A graph would help, we need to scrape scores with timestamps
Jordan King
It's rigged :^)
Cameron Bailey
ip6->ip4 tunnel
William Clark
if it was team name related why not just spam a thread full of one team's name, see what happens? I doubt it is tho
James Kelly
if i had to make a guess it only counts if the exact word is mentioned (not case sensitive) so for example creme and cReME would count but something like cremey wouldn't
Jacob Bailey
I'm thinking the same thing, but maybe the chances of typing out another team then your own are very low.
Zachary Brooks
checking team
Matthew Garcia
sad
Adrian Clark
So you do have a public IPv4 address then, even if it's NAT'ed.
Brody Gonzalez
what is this?
Nolan Green
Should do that with Peanut Butter. They could use the help if that's how it is.
Ian Collins
Very true. I've got it logging every change with timestamps, full scores and diffs, so either at the end of 1 April or when I get bored I'll post a Pastebin link so people can do all that with the data I've gathered. Much too lazy for such a short-lived event.
Can someone make a spamming thread so we can test the name related theory?
Colton Lewis
Can we be not last at least once?
Kayden Miller
what if it's something really trivial like posts made exactly on a minute or posts made every 2 minutes
Nathaniel Cruz
We'd be at way more points, I've seen some 20+ something streaks. This thread ( ) would be + 200 alone
Charles Carter
If it'll make you feel better, I can put your team first in the list. But I won't fudge the scores.
Juan Torres
Have anyone figured out why we are winning?
Blake Garcia
tits... wat team i am?
Jordan Lee
You're thinking too small
There's been million of posts by now so the scores would be way higher
Bentley Young
Maybe it's individual posts mentioning a team. We should make a thread and post the same team repeatedly for a 10 minute window to test. Do it with one of the two low score teams so we can see the difference more clearly.
Angel Wright
>make a spamming thread have you looked around?
David Cox
>implying that is acceptable
double sad.
Jason Gonzalez
if IPv4 is so bad why do you have an address?????
William Carter
if this is true then I should be team Mini
Eli Watson
Go to other boards, there are already a lot of spam threads
Brandon Nguyen
the losing one
Carson Murphy
sheeeiiittt i dont even like peenut butta i rather swap team