You don't need more than 4 megabytes of RAM

You don't need more than 4 megabytes of RAM.

Attached: download (9).jpg (283x178, 7K)

Well, you wouldn't if they didn't write programs as massive fucking monoliths with millions of useless features that do their job shitty. (The actual opposite of Unix philosophy. Linux is twice as guilty as Windows, because Linux could actually change, but reverted instead.

DOS is all you need for a real job.

I guarantee you are using a lot more than 4 mb to shitpost that's for sure

I said "need," not want. When I'm doing real work I never need more than 1MB of RAM, but I know some people who have more consuming work need 4MB. Right now I'm using a luxury of 1GB of RAM, but that's because I'm not working right now.

DOS doesn't even support my wifi printer.

Attached: 1266641695823.jpg (1468x1468, 401K)

Why aren't you using an Ethernet cable, or better yet, a compatible dot matrix?

My grandfather's dotmatrix broke back in 02.

I do.
I need real software for work.

Challenge accepted. Building a fully Goo-ey OS that runs on 640k of RAM.

Plan 9 can do it.

Is it open-source?

yes

You want not need a computer what's the point?

>he needs more than 640kb of ram
what a resource hog LMAO

Attached: 29791336_621605738190108_4644308183932943933_n.jpg (960x720, 119K)

You don't need more than 1 RAM

Attached: .png (282x185, 1K)

>this is what autists actually believe

wrong

Attached: tumblr_o1jb79e7_Uu1s3r0wso1_1280.png (596x598, 707K)

>he needs more than 640k

>some nigger actually bumped this thread

>oh no it happened again

This is shitty ram, caps do discharge over time.

uh...

Wrong image selected my dude?

Windows 1.0 ran in 256 KB.

Original Mac OS ran in 128 KB (but had a lot of help from its ROM).

what program would utilize one byte of RAM? If at all?

GEOS for the Commodore 64 ran in 52k of RAM. No multitasking though - and neither did early classic Mac OS.

it isn't even a working RAM address. You just can't implement it with a capacitor.

There's none. The instructions must be loaded into RAM. Maybe if you were to use 2B of RAM, one for the instruction that loads another instruction from the HDD into the second byte of RAM, to be executed, then you could do something.

>a great-grandmotherboard

Turns out, (you) aren't me. Nice FAIL, OP. Now run along and go be a faggot somewhere else.

512K ought to be enough for anyone

Attached: 512K.jpg (756x420, 132K)

AP()7:569:0210:396:41

Wrong, goy. You need gigabytes of it, so you can buy and run software written people able to code only in safe programming languages running on top of inefficient virtual machines, because they are cheaper and it's good for our profit margins.

using xubuntu 4gb is fine

Not this time, GigaSemyte

>and it's good for our profit margins.
Gotta keep people buying, or people would still be using decades old hardware, and we can't have that can we?