I'm sicked of the fat mouth-breathing fedora guys telling people that it's "gahnoo plus linecks". No, faggot, it's fucking LINUX.
Can you run Linux using only your precious GNU components? No, you can't dicksucker. However, I'm using an operating system that uses the Linux kernel and I don't need no stinking GAHNOO. I'm not using any gahnoo shit on my computer. Would you like me to tell people that I use the gahnoo operating system? No, right? Then WHO is the operating system now?
Why don't you tell us how you intend to use Linux without any gnu components?
Jace Lewis
Linux encompasses GNU, so it's okay to just call it Linux. We don't consider Texas as being separate from the United States just because it started out as its own country. In fact, Stallman didn't even say that "GNU + Linux" quote and there's nothing to suggest he even believes such a notion.
Anthony Johnson
This. You honestly haven't used bash, glibc, coreutils, binutils, diff, find, finger, grep, ftp, telnet, rsh, rlogin, tftp, tar, time, gzip, login, chgroup, or gdb (just to name a few) directly or indirectly since downloading your distro?
Connor Russell
Not OP here, but
> systemd botnet > clang > musl libc > zsh or some other hipster shell
or just
> busybox
inb4 systemd has LGPL license
Ian Edwards
>GNU SED $ echo axxx bxx cx | sed 's/\b[a-z]//g' xxx xx x
>BuggyBox SED $ echo axxx bxx cx | sed 's/\b[a-z]//g' axxx x cx
Proceed calling systemd a botnet and normies woun't believe you when you call actual botnet a botnet.
Liam Wood
calling it linux since 1998, won't stop just because some hippie tells me it's his original OS do not steal. if he really want his precious gnu he should stop eating shit from his foot and make hurd actually usable
Carson Edwards
OP here
>busybox
this
Jeremiah Nelson
>he doesn't know that there are multiple implementations of core utils
Christopher Gonzalez
> Can you run Linux using only your precious GNU components?
Do you even read what you’re saying? Of course you can’t run Linux without running Linux. Doesn’t change the fact that the kernel is one of the many interchangeable components of the GNU system.
And that’s fucking good. The kernel is doing a good job it’s so self-contained that you can replace it with something else that does the same job and can still use the same software.
Camden Bailey
alpine out of box, it's free from glibc, gcc, and the gnu userland
Eli Torres
there's nothing wrong with calling it lignux less typing than GNU/Linux while still mentioning the os and it's still correct according to the FSF
Kevin Hill
Linux is a kernel. GNU is stuff, that screws on kernel and allows user to do things, so let's call GNU a shell. All combined - it is a UNIX-like system
Jack Moore
Linux is not GNU. You can use Linux without GNU just like you can use GNU without Linux.
Asher Morales
Neither GNU and neither Linux are OSes on its own. Let's call GNU+Linux a LNG, or Linux is Not GNU
>Sadly, a kernel by itself gets you nowhere. To get a working system you >need a shell, compilers, a library etc. These are separate parts and may >be under a stricter (or even looser) copyright. Most of the tools used >with linux are GNU software and are under the GNU copyleft. These tools >aren't in the distribution - ask me (or GNU) for more info. >Linus, ftp.funet.fi/pub/linux/historical/kernel/old-versions/RELNOTES-0.01
Isaiah Edwards
Just call linux what it really is: garbage.
Grayson Young
Richard Stallman created the OS in 1983 and he named it GNU.
The Linux Foundation (Facebook, Intel, Microsoft) is a bunch of lying sheckle hungry faggots who want to distract people from freedom, so they censor it when they can.
Ever wondered why nobody calls Android Linux? It contains the same amount if Linux as in GNU/Linux.
You have been trolled.
Adam Rivera
No, it should be called just "GNU" or "GNU/Linux" (GNU+Linux is acceptable, too) to give an equal amount of credit. If the name was picked based on who wrote more source code, it should be called GNU *not* Linux!!
Brandon Peterson
Why should the credit stop there? What about Freedesktop.org, systemd, and friends?
Jace Young
$ uname --operating-system GNU/Linux $ uname --kernel-name Linux checkmate
>Since a long name such as GNU/X11/Apache/Linux/TeX/Perl/Python/FreeCiv becomes absurd, at some point you will have to set a threshold and omit the names That's exactly why I just call it "Linux"
>Since a long name such as GNU/X11/Apache/Linux/TeX/Perl/Python/FreeCiv becomes absurd, at some point you will have to set a threshold and omit the names of the many other secondary contributions. There is no one obvious right place to set the threshold, so wherever you set it, we won't argue against it.
>Different threshold levels would lead to different choices of name for the system. But one name that cannot result from concerns of fairness and giving credit, not for any possible threshold level, is “Linux”. It can't be fair to give all the credit to one secondary contribution (Linux) while omitting the principal contribution (GNU).