Best OS ever. Thank you based God

Best OS ever. Thank you based God.

Attached: openBSD.jpg (294x320, 24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YnNpgtjrM9U&feature=youtu.be
undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;sid=20180309064801
openbsd.org/papers/asiabsdcon2018-vmm-slides.pdf
man.openbsd.org/vmm
youtube.com/watch?v=ykzkU5KuK-k
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

If your God is so good, why does he allow the botnet to exist?

God IS botnet

IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW.

Money, donate your pay.
Automate with a cron job and we'll be ok.
Money, donate your pay.
Thoughtful programming versus "just make it fast".
TLB that cache with high CPU and cause a thrash.
Single cores are out, SMP unlocking
Will get you a faster net stream

Canaries have your back.
In the right place, hacks stop in your protected stack.
Puffy, he's a hit.
Theo doesn't suffer users' ill-informed bullshit.
Fly to hackathons, sleep in dormatory beds
Worldwide userbase, can you fund our project?

Not donating, it's a crime.
Distributed and shared fairly but can't exist on just a dime.
OpenBSD, so they say
Is the securest system today
Don't make us busk until dusk 'cause we'd rather be hacking away

Attached: flat,800x800,075,f.u5.jpg (800x800, 93K)

NetBSD is more stable and secure with a longer release cycle. It runs on literally any CPU architecture known to man and can function well on a couple MB of RAM. The codebase is tiny and well documented, and there are plenty of binary packages out there for desktop use if you're on i386 or amd64. PPC is also pretty good package wise.

The installer is the best part though. If you fuck up your system you can live boot the installer from a flash drive to open a shell, wipe disks, reinstall the base system and/or sets, and even use the GUI to chroot into your boot disk and reinstall packages.

Install NetBSD.

Attached: 1521777400042.png (750x780, 77K)

>The installer is the best part though. If you fuck up your system you can live boot the installer from a flash drive to open a shell, wipe disks, reinstall the base system and/or sets, and even use the GUI to chroot into your boot disk and reinstall packages.
is there any OS you can't do that with? (besides windows, that can't do anything, lol)

Literally all of them. I haven't found anything else with a GUI built in that lets you easily connect to WiFi and chroot into your boot disk to reinstall your software.

OpenBSD and virtual reality

youtube.com/watch?v=YnNpgtjrM9U&feature=youtu.be

Attached: 0e9.jpg (600x600, 27K)

Article on Undeadly [0] mentions Mike Larkin's presentation [1], and pages 26+ talk about ideas for future of OpenBSD's virtualization manager [2], some of which sound a lot like what Qubes is aiming for.

[0] undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;sid=20180309064801
[1] openbsd.org/papers/asiabsdcon2018-vmm-slides.pdf
[2] man.openbsd.org/vmm

You can do that shit with any OS. I've done it several times when an update has fucked up grub.

See >having to type a bunch of commands
>having to fix it by hand
No thanks.

Attached: 1475293208458.png (640x640, 12K)

wtf? I love OpenBSD now

youtube.com/watch?v=ykzkU5KuK-k

>plan 9 support
actually kinda neat, might try that out

i imagine i won't get any video though unless i use drawterm, right?

>less packages = better
Jow Forums bait tactic, the OS is deeply flawed:
>Male alienation as proto-soy affect
>Emasculated, isolated wanting virgin users
>80s neo /v/eddit video game aesthetic
>meme init system
>dishonest package management
>Pseudokino affectations (to arouse the sub 115 IQ Distrowatch population)
Spartan system utilities as means to the soy psyche, its run time is self conscious whilst its aesthetic laid imbued with post macOS futurism as soy affect, no doubt misapproriated by vileueve sycopants who rush to middle brow estrogen-as-suburban-culture enabled by 'Press to skip' ADHD. IN truth they're simply dopamine whores for kinesthetic simulation in proto unix porn imagination and miasma as perpetriatic post Jow Forums consciousness.

Oh, shit . . .
William Burroughs is in the house!

Welcome home, Bill.

Literally doesn't support the 386.
>i486 and above

DAWKINS DAMN MEMORY MANAGEMENT

OpenBSD is a meme
>Filesystem
default FS doesn't even support SSD TRIM, and I don't think OpenBSD supports anything modern like ZFS or BTRFS.
>Security
"Only two remote holes in the default install!!!!!!!"
Yay!
I hope you realize that this literally only applies to a base system install with absolutely no packages added. In other words, not exactly representative or meaningful towards... anything really
>Sustainability
A few years ago, OpenBSD was actually in danger of shutting down because they couldn't keep the fucking lights on. How could anyone see this as a system they could rely on, when it could be in danger of ending at any time?
>Standards-compliance
"B-But OpenBSD is written in strictly standards-compliant C! Clearly that's better than muh GNU virus!"
So you're not allowed to create extensions to the standard? You should only implement the standard and nothing more? Keep in mind that this is nothing like EEE, as the GNU extensions are Free Software, with freely available source code, as opposed to proprietary shite. People should be allowed to innovate and improve things.
If you're gonna be anal about standards-compliance, then why let people make their own implementations anyway? Why not have the standards organizations make one C implementation and force everyone to use it?

Attached: thicc.jpg (442x293, 27K)

based meme poster

It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BSD is dying

One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming close on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.

Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a cockeyed miracle could save *BSD from its fate at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

Fact: *BSD is dying

>absolutely no packages added
except for a web server, smtp server, various network routing daemons, multiple window managers, their own super-secure fork of Xorg, and equivalents of coreutils, binutils, gcc, and autotools?

At boot I can set OpenBSD to boot the ramdisk kernel, where I can do the same thing without an additional drive

You're retarded but you're certainly persistent.

Install DragonflyBSD.

Attached: image.jpg (300x187, 70K)

if OpenBSD's main goal is to be secure, why isn't it using a compartmentalized microkernel?