Look at this fucking 45W high-end laptop CPU:
> i9 8950HK
> 6c/12t
> 2.9GHz - 4.8GHz
> 12MB cache
> unlocked
This little monster probably destroys the desktop 1600X at 45W.
How can AMD even compete?
I9 Mobile
Wyatt James
Other urls found in this thread:
ark.intel.com
twitter.com
Anthony Cooper
It'll draw up to 100w under load just like their previous 45/47w laptop parts.
Jayden Adams
Ethan Jones
Turbo doesn't give a flying fuck about TDP. Nice bait though.
Mason Bennett
>meltdown™ inside
>How can AMD even compete?
easy
Tyler Hall
AMD can't compete. That's the problem
Dominic Ramirez
That's totally false. I have a 47W quad-core i7 in my laptop, and under full CPU load it uses exactly 47W.
I believe if you stress the iGPU it will get higher than that tho.
Grayson Jackson
> 6c/12t
so..same
> 2.9GHz - 4.8GHz
obviously much better, +ipc
> 12MB cache
worse than a 1600x
> unlocked
same again
You forgot how amd actually competes though, which is price. I don't think you can buy a i9 8950HK, but when it and the 2600x are out, it will be 2-2.5x the price of a 2600x.
Camden Cruz
>How can AMD even compete
>$583 wholesale in lots of 1000
>1600 is $189 retail with free delivery
Gavin White
>and the 2600x are out
wrong.
Dominic Torres
As in, the future, are you illiterate?
Wyatt Hughes
>when it and the 2600x are out, it will be 2-2.5x the price of a 2600x.
Ethan Wood
>believing Intel made application
Nice try Schlomo
Levi Ross
this:
Adrian James
Ryzen 1700 laptops exists and vaporize this piece of shit
Luis Gray
Leaked prices on Amazon has te 2600x at $230, this i9's MSRP is $583 in 1000 lot units (already 2.5x the price, since its clear you can't do math) - likely far higher for consumers like literally all laptop cpus are, how is this hard to understand?
Matthew Garcia
And those trips are check'd.
Eli Nelson
> 65W vs 45W
> 3.7GHz vs 4.8GHz
> no iGPU vs has iGPU
Carter Ward
>45w
Maybe watching YouTube videos. Wouldn't surprise me if there weren't any laptops capable of cooling this piece of shit.
Charles Sanders
Oh no, its accurate. Its just running some instruction loops on CPU threads only. Ensuring that its absolutely nothing like any real workload.
The Macbook Pro with Iris equipped intel chip drew 88-90w under load in real world tests. These new ones will be the same.
Jaxon Moore
Yea who cares about laptop crap
where's my desktop i9 8th gen
Benjamin Fisher
>97,11 °C
nice temps fag
Eli Martinez
Clevo/MSI
Parker Thompson
Eh, thats okay for intel mobile chips. My Sandy Bridge latop hits 95c+/- before the fan really kicks into overdrive and cools it down. They run hot.
Jack Allen
It'll only run 2.9ghz across 6 cores making it slower than a 1600x which will do 3.8ghz across 6 cores or something
Jason King
Ryzen can only vaporise the cheap piece of shit laptop that uses it.
Luis Howard
>4.8GHz
It's a fucking joke.
Liam Rivera
They are just DTR chips not laptop chips. It pulls closer to 80-100W when fully loaded (very good for what it is). 45W is closer to expected power consumption under normie usage patterns.
They are just cherry-picked, cream of the top Coffee Lake yields. Nothing special kiddos.