77% of Poles use Adblocking software

How about your country?
At what point the Internet will become unprofitable?
Will normies finally fuck off then?

Attached: link_e9JEnZRjzFQAGRgSeuZVgtj5k4qEXKS4 w300h223.jpg (300x223, 8K)

Other urls found in this thread:

silesiasem.pl/stosowanie-adblockow-w-blokowaniu-reklam-w-polsce-wyniki-badania
theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2018/apr/05/whats-up-pewdiepie-the-troubling-content-of-youtubes-biggest-star
researchgate.net/publication/324227406_Adblock_Usage_in_Web_Advertisement_in_Poland
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Subscription services are the way of the future, I think.

I'm not paying for fake news.

they'll just get money by selling your data instead or embedding cryptominers

we need a botnet-free browser that comes with built-in adblock desu

Sources?

>embedding cryptominers
you can block them too

how about the idea of generating masses of fake personal data and selling the entire package to advertising assholes? you'd have to know your statistics pretty well, and you'd need a cover story, like "we have a game app that spies on people between the ages of 14 and 34".

if they want fake news, we'll give it to them. we'll give them so much fucking fake news that they'll choke on it.

this is a fun idea

im a pole i confirm

Nobody would notice. Advertisers aren't doing anything useful with all the data they collect now.

more like proleland haha

Ad Nauseam does it, we had 10 threads a day before....

Doesn't matter desktop neanderthal

You can't easily block on mobile and most of the world is mobile.

I think the russian government did something like this relatively recently

silesiasem.pl/stosowanie-adblockow-w-blokowaniu-reklam-w-polsce-wyniki-badania

This is pretty true for now, but that might change also. For example while Apple is pretty gay in some ways, they have never really tried to profit off selling user data. I wouldn't be blown away if they ended up allowing and putting in themselves some kind of blocking software. Even now I run an adblocker on my phone and use a VPN. VPNs are super easy on phones, I'd say even easier for normies than on a computer.

Then pay for a decent news source like Washington Post or The Guardian and not for Fox.

G-d bless the braindead west for giving up on general computation this easily

>being this much of a soyboy cuck

Fox news is the only reliable source of news in the US, apart from online-only media.
Most other news stations are owned by globalist jews who spout their marxist agenda

Attached: 1508079962419.png (225x225, 20K)

>can't easily block on mobile
literally firefox with ublock origin
>but i use muh apps with ads
then you deserve it

> One is filled with crybabies the other one wrote an article about how bad it is that pewdiepie is encouraging kids to read books.

please link the article to show that you are not misrepresenting it :)

xoxo

>libtards still pushing the Russian narrative because they lost and will lose again in 2020

IT WAS HER TURN

>Fox news is the only reliable source of news in the US

Don't know if troll or stupid.

this was around 2014 I think

Atleast advertisement is blatant. If ads are eradicated, shills will prevail.

theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2018/apr/05/whats-up-pewdiepie-the-troubling-content-of-youtubes-biggest-star
> xoxo
I mean i like traps but even i am not that gay

I have a content driven website. About 10% of my profit comes from ads. 90% from shilling.

I considered removing ads entirely, but my business partner refuses to give in.

sure

>Felix “PewdiePie” Kjellberg is funny, intelligent, innovative and highly charismatic. He also has one of the world’s biggest public platforms and a remit restricted only by YouTube’s terms of service. To call him an alt-right agitator would perhaps be unfair as he has never publicly identified with the proto-fascist movement.
did you even read past the headline

>proto-fascist
seriously?

this is Jow Forums we're talking about

Attached: 1521658582951.png (389x386, 312K)

>apple
>giving users control over their device

Attached: 1498840662818.png (2376x2592, 1.31M)

>they'll just get money by selling your data
if there are no ads, what puppose does that data have?

You must be mentally retarded to believe that I would pay to read any of that. I get my news from rense.com, Daily Stormer, Drudge Report, 8/pol/, Google searches, Twitter, stormfront.org and liveleak.com. News on the Internet doesn't require a subscription.

Psychological manipulation is much more than just blatant ads. And besides, it's not even their problem anymore once they sell your data.

What kind barbaric language is this?

>blatant ads=/=psychological manipulation
also paranoid NEETs will call anyone with a preference/bias a shill

>psychological manipulation isn't pisychological manipulation

>make my own static image ad
>put it in the sidebar, with an affiliate link
>so there is zero tracking unless you click on it

>try it on my phone with ublock origin
>click on it
>ublock doesn't let me load the site
wtf is this shit?

what now

Why? Just block all ad domains in your host file or your firewall/router. They don't disguise ad domains.

Working as intended.

>the guardian
Are retard you ?

Attached: 1520551508256.jpg (512x498, 30K)

(You)

There is no reason to improve ads if the alternatives aren't allowed either desu. Then you might as well stick with Google or its shady competitors.

fox news is just as fake news as CNN

Point was normie-friendliness. Thread is about eradicating ad profits, so taking it to the layman is the idea here.

I will never turn off my adblocker ever for any reason regardless if I agree with the politics of the website or not. I don't owe the site anything and if the website in question was worth paying for put your shit behind a subscription or something.

How is a new player going to compete with large brands if they have put their content behind a paywall?

I don't know that's their problem to deal with not mine

I'm not saying that's your problem. I'm saying your argument is bullshit.

Why do I owe the website anything by turning off my adblocker

Won't be unprofitable for a long time, android is the most used mobile OS and it's hard to block ads without root access, even if you use firefox + ublock origin many apps have ads that you can't remove

Also normals won't give up subscriptions for things like netflix and spotify even if they do block ads

We've been saying that for 20 years.

That's from the Guardian article soyfag.

lol the entire article is literally - He's not left wing enough, and that's a bad thing!

>subscription services are the future
>google comes with one unified subscription payment service
>just log into google and you automatically pay for all websites you visit
>no tracking at all!!!

Then just wait for the free alternative to come out

I'm not trying to see "good" or "bad" ads. I don't want to see any ads and will block them all regardless. They've had decades to work on good ads and have constantly shown they don't give a shit.

It's totally possible for any startup to make it without ads if they just trimmed out the fat with 100 billion scripts or very bloated web design

>At what point the Internet will become unprofitable?

Never, it is only going to get worse. The next step is the removal of adblockers by making it illegal to use them, the seeds of thought have already been sewn in this regard.

How they do this:
>identify something they want to change
>speak up about it publically
>most people don't care
>2 years later bring it up again
>the argument now has some history and is taken more seriously
>at this point they bring out the propaganda and turn side A against side B
>the side they dislike are slowly but surely branded worse than hitler over the next few years
>change the law

I watched them do this with pirates, torrent users (pirates or not), and people who refuse to use social media.

sown.

>and people who refuse to use social media.

>If you don't have an online presence in 2018, you're not a real person. That, or you're Amish.

I read that on a tech site yesterday. That's how insane shit is now.

maybe you should stop visiting dodgy porn/piracy websites

They had Safari content blockers since 2016 or so.

Nah, I'd rather just block the gigantic overlay ad for a car or graphics card on any tech website, the retarded autoplay ads on normal websites, or block literally any ad that runs on any website at all when accessed on a mobile phone.

i use ublock and umatrix and then i throw a tantrum when i can't browse a website 'cause adblock detection

am i an entitled millenial now?

Reddit really has leaked into this site beyond repair. Sad.

Why doesn't uBO have an option to block all 3rd party elements by default? You will have to whitelist some stuff like 4cdn when posting here, but it's way easier than having to block 10 3rd party malware domains every time you open a new site, considering that now most sites use those dynamic sdjfshfoweoisbfu.com domains to inject ads

polish language, kurwa :^)

>not rooting or jailbreaking
>no idea of adaway and 1blocker
You don't deserve to post on Jow Forums

Jailbreaking hasn't been good since 9.0.2. Every jailbreak after that is a semi-untether that destroys all the security features the os has.

Am I the only one who thinks that advertisment is a scam? Look how much money the advertisement industry got. Does advertisement really make such a difference? Aren't people used to ignore it? It seems like a conspiracy for Google and others to make money.

>porn
when will this meme end? Many porn sites aren’t dodgy at all since they literally want you to pay.

>implying jailbreaking is secure anyway
How many people have had their ssh passwords on their device unchanged after jailbreaking it again?
But still, I'm curious to learn what you're talking about.

Who gives a fuck about the poles?

Indonesia
61%

>Washington Post
Literal fake news owned by the devil himself: Bezos.
> The Guardian
Communist propaganda from far left.

Off yourself, dipshit.

Poland is the last bastion of european culture

>slavic
>barbaric
Lol. Don't use words you don't understand.
researchgate.net/publication/324227406_Adblock_Usage_in_Web_Advertisement_in_Poland

Decent bait. Have a (You).

I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about
t. vodkanigger

Attached: pac od animki.gif (487x560, 817K)

The same thing we have been saying since at the least the 1890s in USA, and at the least 1920s in Europa:
They do not compete.
Either they have the cash needed to upscale, or they can't compete.
Marked has been stonewalled by this for far longer than modern times user.

Advertisement is simply a method to wage a information war so that the "customers" can have the information that something exists.
Advertisement can only exist as long as there exists uninformed customers about the local services, which has uniformly proved to be true.
It also works because people enjoy to pick the first and best option, meaning that "a drink exists" is a valid way to bring about a message.

uMatrix

Lightning for android and Brave for desktop/android. Sure brave is botnet but far less than Google. Anyone who gives a shit will use Firefox + uBO

You can say mean things about refugees in poland without getting arrested for hate speech like in the UK, sweden, or germany

>rense.com, Daily Stormer, Drudge Report, 8/pol/, Google searches, Twitter, stormfront.org and liveleak.com.
>news
You might as well take economic advice from mises.org/marxists.org, if you wanna believe in ideology driven bullshit.

So if adblock makes the internet unstable, we can just move the users to the left?

Correct! Look at the triggered idiots replying to your post. Keep up the retardation, morons. I bet you think meat is ethical too you festering shits.