Intel won't release spectre patch for more than 200 processors

Attached: neeside.png (1193x674, 78K)

How do you update it?

oh no, they aren't patching Pentium III

Attached: 1521447498269.png (820x729, 106K)

I see no pentium3 on that list.

>Stopped – After a comprehensive investigation of the microarchitectures and microcode capabilities for these products, Intel has determined to not release
microcode updates for these products for one or more reasons including, but not limited to the following:
>• Micro-architectural characteristics that preclude a practical implementation of features mitigating Variant 2 (CVE-2017-5715)
>• Limited Commercially Available System Software support
>• Based on customer inputs, most of these products are implemented as “closed systems” and therefore are expected to have a lower likelihood of
exposure to these vulnerabilities.

westmerefag here, why should i give a single fuck?

It's basically anything older than the Nehalem Xeons. Bloomfield, the Nehalem HEDT SKUs are the only ones remotely useful today, but all of those are interchangeable with Nehalem Xeons since it was a unified platform.

These are ass-old CPUs, about ten years old.

Where is the problem? Will AMD release updates for my Phenom 9600 from 2007?

/thread and OP is a faggot

yes because amd actually care about their customers

So you're saying intel should give people with defective CPUs they can't fix new ones??!?

>Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9000
Fuck.

I patched mine and rolled it back because they pulked support. There is a new patch now and i am not going to run it until i need to. Currently no one is being hacked by spector and its really hard to exploit

amd 1600x here

no problems at all
suck shit intards
had a 920 from 2009-2014 as well

>amd poozen

Attached: 1491916955985.png (653x726, 42K)

>Poo inside graphics

Attached: Raja-Koduri-Joins-Intel-2060x1471.jpg (2060x1471, 300K)

OH NO A 1600X IS 1FPS SLOWER AT 1080P MAX OR 4K OH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>inb4 some intard posts that 1080p low farcry 5 benchmark by pcgaymer

Attached: 1467327921774.png (2000x1367, 1.49M)

>no bugs
>user happy that his 1600x is problem-free
>this shill still posts this "poozen" garbage
mate, it doesn't matter that you spent $1000 for intel cpu and motherboard. just sell it and get the cpu you secretly love.

Intel fags BTFO!!!!!!!

>support for cpus released 10 years or more ago

Attached: 1523019352039.png (100x100, 12K)

Yes. Good goy! Buy inturd!

Attached: 1495995431673.jpg (852x939, 222K)

So, you're saying intel is shit and doesn't care about its customers?
wow, shocking. thanks for proving me right

So, I own a 3770 Ivy Bridge. I know I'm fucked but how as AMD has some requirements to be exploited does Intel has the same requirements? Or we are spread as a whore for whole world?

serves you right for buying jewish garbage
enjoy that cock up your ass, goy, meanwhile I'm /comfy/ with the FX-8350

Attached: mommy.jpg (420x494, 42K)

This.

>shills trying hard to hide the fact this was a confirmed NSA backdoor

>not upgrading annually

Attached: 1522776275673.gif (320x320, 240K)

Are you retarded? I made a question and you made totally different statement from what I've asked.
I live in 3rd world country. Its not like if I live in the US.

A socket a year keeps the goyim in fear!

And I don't even care about buying a new computer every year. It simply works well anyway. Jow Forums has large steam library and plays indie games on their ryzen's and skylake processors.

Fuck off.

Some of us demand premium performance. If you laid off the soy toys for little boy boy you could afford premium computing experiences too.

Attached: 1523029257894.webm (1280x720, 241K)

Intbeciles are the soy boys if anyone, since you're constantly jerking eachother off over 2 extra frames in the latest battlefield.

>how dare them not patching my 15 year old cpu im team poozen now !

It's okay young soyim, lash out in your fear and rage. Cling to your putdowns and ignore how many professionals you are actually talking too.

Attached: 1522874946743.png (299x128, 19K)

You do know that shilltel chips performing at 60% are no longer viable for professionals, right?
You don't actually run xeon servers at work now that epyc is a thing, right? There's no way anyone could be that retarded.

Attached: shilltel btfo.jpg (1200x675, 122K)

Holy shit, I thought you were taking the piss but hot damn you got AMD balls deep in your mouth.

The absolute state.

Attached: 1522773645076.jpg (455x675, 113K)

>supporting the company with superior products and ethics
>bad

>spectre patch
Wow, it's nothing. On the other hand

>implying something else won't come along since those pajeets at Intel are likely hiding a bunch of skeletons in their closet.exe folder

I smell another class action lawsuit coming. Think we'll all be getting $15 like with the Pentium 4s?

You two are like apes.

>Q6600 not in the list
Nice

Found the phone poster!

Here you go, something as relevant as what you just posted.

Attached: 5n.jpg (1585x2819, 358K)

the kpti patch is not the same as the Spectre patch my /v/ro

>ctrl+f
>2500k
>0 matches
ayy lmao

and magically can't be replicated.

(((citation needed)))

Nnnnnoooooooooooooooo!!!!!!

This was supposed to be our YEAR!

Attached: 1500010756103.png (1228x1502, 944K)

brehs I'm having a fucking panic attack lmaosss

FUCK SECURITY
FUCK OUR CUSTOMERS
BUY INTEL

wow, so it won't release patches for really outdated processors that have very low market presence and are out of official support by now?
SHOCKING

there's a ton of reasons to hate Intel, but getting mad over petty shit is pointless

>i7-9xx aren't patched
What the fuck, I thought they were only leaving Core 2 and older from their mainstream products, this is the scummiest move Intel has EVER done to their customers
No need to update if you run anything that runs 64 bit Linux, W10 might have the mitigations in this older CPUs too
All of those are fast enough for anything in $current_year, specially housefire i7's
They didn't even bother adding it, anything pre-Sandy Bridge isn't getting patched

Thinkpad btfo'd

Attached: 876556966565956996.jpg (499x499, 17K)

No fucking way. Only C2Q and i7s are barely usable today.

>Only 1st gen Core can be Liberbooted
>Intel decides to leave these vulnerable

Really makes my pinkle tinkle

so wait they're not patching 3570k's?

what the fuck

Fact is most applications can't be heavily threaded. Single thread perf is king.

but those Jow Forums-thinpads usually use sandy bridge, which are covered

I think you're thinking of amd

Yeah, was just bantering. My T440p will be fine, As long as you're not some pleb with a Core 2 Duo you'll be good

Yes goyim you need this latest i9 for any task!

Bullshit, C2Q and 1st gen i5 & i7 processors are still fine for most things except shit like newer vidya. They have absolutely no problem browsing the web and streaming / playing media which is all that the average person does on their computer.

hahahahahhaahhahahaahahhahahahaahahahahhaahahahahhahahahaahhaha
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHHEHEHEEHHEEHEH
>intel

DELID

Attached: 1494523232402.jpg (960x878, 125K)

Are you fucking retarded? A first gen i7 is i3 tier now.

so..perfectly capable for anything?

Yea goyim just buy a new cpu

Attached: Holy+i+didn+t+have+that+one+_27f4ea5616d2dbe9b98e1e04f0cfb675.png (200x200, 26K)

Attached: Laughing Alligators.png (455x395, 448K)

>no patch for i7 970, 980x, 990x, Xeon W3690
>patch for Xeon X5650, X5660, X5670, X5690, W3670, W3680, etc.
>call the ones that aren't getting patched Gulftown and the ones that are Westmere-EP, as if those things aren't basically the same
I don't understand. I was thinking about replacing my X5650 with a W3690, too.

Attached: 1498456561710.jpg (736x691, 49K)

You're sure they're patching them? They might have just skipped them in the announcement

>>support for cpus released 10 years or more ago
>knowingly cheated in security to get better cache performance.
>goyim, you caught us late, we will fix only what we want.

So? What does this have to do with the CPUs being too old to warrant support either way?

>DATS RITE GOY, LET YOUR PC OPEN TO VULNERABILITIES JUST LIKE YOU OPEN BORDERS TO REFUGEES :^)

Attached: 1515002175262.jpg (626x487, 18K)

Yep, they're in the PDF under Westmere-EP. Production Status: Production, in yellow so it's updated info.

this is literally nothing goym trust us
we also released new cheap motherboards so you can buy our overpriced under powered shit again
we promise no new backddors for next six months

8th is already patched? I though this year ryzen will beat intel

Dam, this soy stuff is getting surreal. I'm scared.

Attached: 1521830159820.png (760x400, 381K)

There are no remote exploits for Spectre, so who cares.
If you run untrusted code you're fucked anyway.
>inb4 javascript
who the fuck is retarded enough to have javascript enabled?

Last time i checked AMD outsold intel in retail

Attached: chrome_2018-04-06_16-19-40.png (897x1179, 538K)

well they offer best price to performance ratio so you are right :^)

wew, they really want to push some common customers to newer chips, thank mommy su Ryzen is good

>no Q6600
HAHAHA
I have that processor.
You laughed at me in another thread!

AGESA 1.0.0.1a will bring IBPB to the cpu too

>anything pre-Sandy Bridge isn't getting patched
32nm westmere and nehalem Xeons are still getting patched though

If the CPUID is different, then the microcode can differentiate. i7 3970X for example have the same CPUID as Xeon E5-2687W.

You don't get nothing goyim!

>Nehalem and Nehalem EX are getting patches
What the fuck, are these CPUs the best investment that I have ever made? X5675 still out-perform just about everything on the market right now, and they will get patched? Life is good.

p3 aint vulnerable