How Jow Forumsay is Jow Forums?
Other urls found in this thread:
reddit.com
conservapedia.com
twitter.com
Op, you forgot to vote; you flamboyant faggot.
>_
bumping. We've got a lot of OwO people (aka maximum gay), but also a lot of curious anons. Hello there!
Also 2 straight people, and one member of the bisexual master race.
Does owo mean very homosexual ?
The options are ordered from least to most
homosexuality is societally degenerative because aside from those who partake being undesirable usually by the opposite sex and/or emotionally or mentally damaged in some way, it also places people in a social dynamic that necessarily opposes and is eventually entirely anti-heterosexual which being the vast majority >95 percent of people causes those who are homosexual in some way to attempt to actively or inactively sabotage/oppose any society favored by that majority. We have seen this occur in the recent push to accept transexuallism after homosexuals were successful in legal terrorism in the name of rights.
So owo is a level beyond total faggot , implying greater than 100% faggot
this
homosexuality of any form is the at least partial by-product of female hypergamy and male hyper-libiduousness
Your child will turn out trans. Or maybe die in a car accident at a very young age. Or your mother will suffer from horrible dementia and you will have to watch her lost her mind until she completely stops recognizing you.
Maybe something else. But when it happens you WILL remember this post.
this, the rise in homosexuality was due to homosexual behaviour being limited in the past by a stigma as a result of spreading, then untreatable STDs, they are mostly to blame for the rise in hpv as applies to oral and anal cancer.
>has no argument against whats said
>s-something bad will happen to you because of your completely correct opinions because it hurts my feelings/opposes my twisted and malformed worldview
lol bump
I'm into girls and traps, what am I?
a degenerate. see
>OwO as an option
Well I hope OP wasn't looking for accurate results
I'm a deeply closeted gay man.
I'm bi.
youre a product of social decay
>Not at all, totally straight
reddit.com
>Does owo mean very homosexual ?
sure is newfag in here
Men have been sucking each other dicks forever. It's the most natural thing there is. It's a bonding exercise. I wouldn't expect a degenerate Jow Forumstard to understand.
Gaily reminder that yer bunghole didn't have enough time nor evolutionary pressure to evolve to handle this shit:
conservapedia.com
Quote of the day:
>Gay men in this country have both higher rates of intercourse and many more sexual partners than do either straight men or gay women.
Looks like the hetero slags in that country've been slutting it up
>Conservapedia
> Trash.jpeg
Who carries if we evolved to do anything anyway? You didn't evolve to use cars or computers dumbshit. If you're appealing to nature plenty of animals love fucking each other in the ass.
>I much prefer my own filter bubble that hides any health concerns from me
Nigga if you don't skim info from both biased POVs, you're opening yourself to harm from irresponsibly biased narratives.
>Who carries
heh
>Who cares if we evolved to do anything anyway
Who cares if dogs didn't evolve to safely process theobromine? Fuck it, if I can eat 99% pure chocolate, why shouldn't Fido have some? Damn gubbmint telling people what to do!
>You didn't evolve to use cars or computers dumbshit.
The vadge had the evolutionary pressure that if it couldn't handle getting roughed up pretty good, its carrier's genes would be filtered out the pool very quickly. Not so much with the rectum (damn near killed'em) and colon.
>If you're appealing to nature plenty of animals love fucking each other in the ass.
If you're appealing to nature, plenty of animals love drinking antifreeze.
All I'm saying is if I were a bottom4lyfe in the utopic future, I'd want them to engineer me a vadge and prostate good enough to handle the kinky shit I'd be up to.
As for now, all I'm saying is: keep an eye on that lower GI tract with your doc, you're using your body outside its performance envelope.
Shame we're not doing more longitudinal research with anoreceptive folk - porn stars are a decently sized pool.
>Who cares if dogs didn't evolve to safely process theobromine?
Fucking a man won't kill you. Just like all the other activities I listed won't. Chocolate will kill dog.
>As for now, all I'm saying is: keep an eye on that lower GI tract with your doc, you're using your body outside its performance envelope.
I've never let a man fuck me in the ass. So. I'm not worried about.
>I much prefer my own filter bubble that hides any health concerns from me
Conservapedia isn't a science journal. It's an echo chamber for ignorant retards no different from rational wiki.
>Fucking a man won't kill you
Most of the times. It's easier to fuck someone's shit up short/long/permanent-term by poking them up the ass compared to up the vadge.
Not to mention the anus/rectum lining's reduced robustness (compared to vadge) being the main reason for the huge increase in risk for STI transmission.
>I've never let a man fuck me in the ass. So. I'm not worried about.
Good for you, on the anal trauma front. I'm writing this for the wider audience. Note if you're boning someone up the arse (f/m), there's still the STI angle to be mindful of, especially in the MSM scenario.
>echo chamber for ignorant retards
Sure, maybe.
It's still useful as an aggregator of "butt stuff bad" claims, which can be added to the to-be-verified pile of folks that prefer to be better informed. LGBT's been so politicised that downplaying of possible concerns in mainstream sources is a legitimate, uh, concern.
Although now that we've gotten a bit more humane towards the gay lads (still more to go till it trickles down to the stragglers), it seems we're seeing some more down-to-earth health discussions.
Still a long way to go for the trans folk tho.
I don't like anal sex with men or women. It's true that liberals will only bring up the dangers involving men and women mostly to say that the men who enjoy anal sex are sociopath animals that get off on hurting women. Anal sex isn't the only way for men to enjoy other men's company.
>liberals will only bring up the dangers involving men and women mostly to say that the men who enjoy anal sex are sociopath animals that get off on hurting women.
Nah, I think that's the delusional subset of feminists.
Don't let the US's 3rd world 2-party FPTP dystopia libcuck/cuckservative false dichotomy of a political system muddy things up.
>Nah, I think that's the delusional subset of feminists.
You can find articles about in mainstream publications. Feminism has become a meme topic for liberals in general. Everyone is getting on the man bashing train lately. Wasn't even as bad a few years ago. This election cycle seems to have launched everyone into a frenzy of stupidity.