Pale Moon: We dont care about OpenBSD, nor users in general

Just be thankful people like this usually get weeded out of being in charge of anything truly essential.

Palememe is even worse. One example: it uses a 3rd party start page that makes connections to a LOT of anti-user sites and sets a shit ton of tracking cookies etc. Every single Palememe user gets pozzed right in the beginning by default.

palemoon.start.me/start

>he doesn’t know how to change his home page

This, but I gotta take the OpenBSD guy's side here.
Pale moon has been losing my trust since the fiasco where they removed that extension that blocked ads, but also clicked on em or something which made the company lose profit.
Literally about to switch to IceCat 2bh fampai.

Attached: 4chan.png (153x231, 35K)

Of course I know. When testing Palememe with a fresh profile you either have to block its connection to internet (and change settings), or create a user.js file with changed prefs before the first start. The point is that almost none of the users do this, or know about it. Palememe is often seen as some kind of privacy respecting Firefox fork when it's actually the opposite for most users. They get pozzed

the openbsd guy should've kept violating the palememe license, so that the furry would've ended bankrupting himself on lawyer fees for a logo

it's hard to get away with directly violating your manifesto if you are not the size of google

I have been having major problems with Pale Moon and Google capatcha. It takes 3-10 tries to get it to solve. Sometimes it refuses to solve.
Google now sometimes thinks I am a bot with Pale Moon too.
When I use other browsers or my phone from the same IP I have no issues. The problem seems isolated to Pale Moon. Wtf is up with that?

Open Source blows. It's getting to be like the Tower of Babble. Everyone talking and working in a different direction.

google thinks furries are not humans, how intolerant

>Babble
american education

>pale meme

it doesn't even have sandboxing. you are a retard if you run this shit

Doesn't that branding rule make Firefox/pale moon nonfree?

Goodbye petulant moonchild.

Technically yeah.

>You will revise
what a kind of speg says this instead of can you revise or something not autistic

I've talked to Moonchild before, and he's a capitalist intellectual-property fanatic. Nothing unexpected in his behavior.

Yes, it's why IceWeasel and IceCat even existed (Firefox branding being proprietary)
I guess it'd be easy to make IceMoon.

Correct. Mozilla's trademarks are nonfree, even if their code is free. Therefore, as a total, made of copyrighted code and trademarked logos and art, yes, Firefox is nonfree, and so is Palemoon.

Everything made with the Mozilla Public License is non-free if it contains even a single thing that can be trademarked.

So, IceMoon or HamGalaxy (better name) fork when?

So is there still a good Firefox fork with classic (pre-australis-meme) interface?

Fuck you jew

What a cuck-parade without anyone actually gaining anything in the end.
So much for muh open sourceeeee.

He could probably have copypasted the entire rebrand from an XP build. All of this has been gone through before. That said, these things cost time. I can't see what OpenBSD is going to do for a browser desu.

Not all meme browsers compile obfuscated. A snorting panties maker would easily have a better quote, but I'm not in the f mood for the meme s

i get this as well, i keep a chrome installation just for stubborn captchas

Do people really, truly use amateur ports like this?
I mean it, do people use these things maintained by a handful of hobbyist developers and expect anything remotely secure or reliable? Especially when they purposely deviate from the source and make their own job at backporting shit even harder.

Just because Jews don't know how to spell doesn't mean the post is wrong Eurocuk.

Attached: (you).png (735x541, 27K)

What's so bad about palemoon besides the branding autism? It's old firefox that still uses gtk2. Good enough for me.

holy shit lol

This is what a world in which GNUfags try to control every is like.

Palemoon violates the GPL retard.

kys copyshit faggots.

(((your browser)))

Attached: BaSeD.png (1039x672, 64K)

Attached: this is the guy who calls other people petulant children lol.png (288x378, 90K)

lmao autistic shit flinging by a bunch of furries who "made" a "browser"

Is the issue reporter guy autistic or something?

Granted, the project owner is also a hot head.

>You will revise
>You must comply
>explain and justify the patches you are applying

Jesus Christ

Attached: mattatobin.png (255x437, 120K)

Wow the pale moon dev team consists of furries and assholes. Just use vanilla firefox.

Probably. ibara could have responded more civilly but I can see why he didn't. I hate working with spergs too.

What the hell?
Fuck palemoon.

Attached: 1505902684785.jpg (1066x600, 171K)

I'm in love with that smug face

is that the lead pedo dev?

>you will revise

haha lmao fucking autists

He looks less 'Classic Pedo' and more "I'm learning Japanese because the age of consent there is 13"

>I can't see what OpenBSD is going to do for a browser desu.
OpenBSD already has plenty of other browsers to choose from, including firefox and seamonkey with their original branding (including OpenBSD specific patches), so it's not exactly a big deal.

It just goes to show how much of a sperg the palememe devs are that they're more autistic about their "IP" than even the fucking upstream codebase they're blatantly pulling from.

Attached: file.jpg (600x315, 22K)

>ibara could have responded more civilly but I can see why he didn't
Yeah, if some guy rolled up on my project with that "you will revise" bullshit, I'd probably tell him to fuck off too. Especially when the whole repo is clearly labeled as unfinished/WIP

wish I was in charge of the repo, i'd have renamed it www/furfag-shitmoon

>using furshit unironically

It's filled with security holes because it relies on custom homebrewed forks of outdated versions of common shared libraries/utilities like sqlite as well. It wasn't just Firefox that they forked. Are you really gonna trust a 2 man team to maintain all that legacy code by themselves? There's a reason why they're so anal about having their shit ported anywhere.

Not to mention that they can't even put their shit on Fdroid:

gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/merge_requests/260

forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?t=18256

if you want an old-school firefox gtk2 browser that's actually reliable, use seamonkey.

Attached: file.jpg (549x720, 77K)

/pedogate/furrymoon

>security

lmao you mean you don't do everything in person

seamonkey is great. built-in thunderbird and it's still less bloated than firefox and fagmoon

>It's filled with security holes
Such as?

cp-browsers/pedomoon-furryfox

old huge codebase built by 2 pedo furrrylovers is secure?

it has never been audited because it's enough of a joke for researchers to not bother

Jesus the pale moon dev is more insane than I thought.

I don't see any proof here. Just memes.

stop shillling your browser.
no one will even bother to investigate this meme browser. at best it's so obscure that no one bother to exploit it.

this

everyone normal uses brave

>t. brave shill

yeah, okay.

it's a good browser so i have no problem shilling for Brendan "Gas the K" Eich's browser

Attached: tanfogliowitnesshunter10mm.jpg (1333x1000, 733K)

This is what happens when you let furries and lolberts get their way

Imagine being this autistic

it's a "meme" that a browser just casually decided to fork crucial underlying tech like a whole fucking database engine, that it clearly doesn't have the manpower to update, let alone maintain?

There's a reason software typically uses shared libraries, retard.

you mean
>Brendan "Gave Us JS Cancer" Eich

Attached: file.png (1452x2208, 843K)

Palemoon has been faggy since they blocked AdNauseam as "malware"
Your browser, your way - my ass.

welp you got me

Attached: YGjShnm.png.jpg (480x270, 31K)

They just ship builtin libraries. They don't actually have to maintain them besides pulling updates from upstream and occasional patches for palemoon.

>I don't want you to build my browser yourself and then distribute the resulting binaries with official branding. It's not your job to build anyway, it's mine,…"

god! it's full retardation at maximum

>ship builtin libraries
>with patches
>not actually maintenance
what kind of doublespeak is this?

that's like saying package maintainers for debian/arch/gentoo/whatever don't have to do anything. It'd be nice if that were the case, but it's not how things work out in reality. And that's that Linux distros and bsd's all have way more manpower behind them than this meme browser.

shit, just realized the second link was wrong. Should've been this one:
forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?t=5772

also, bonus thread:
forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?t=10222

>package maintainers for debian/arch/gentoo/whatever don't have to do anything
Have you never maintained a package? 99% of the time, it's not much more complicated than checking out a specific version. It only gets dicey if you're running a bunch of deep, extensive patches or something.

Did you read the links in this thread? The palememe devs specifically talked about having deep specific patches.

>The difference is that F-Droid builds the app, then offers binaries THEY built with THEIR signature (not the software authors')
So in other words, dude's mad that F-Droid works exactly like every decent Linux distro in existence?

Palemoon is like Firefox 30 or something. It has 20+ security holes. Don't believe me? Install vanilla instances of palemoon and Firefox esr/quantum on 2 machines. Browse to a degenerate website you know is infested with stubs. Music share, degenerate porn tubes with niche genres, mirror torrent sites. Watch how the

Attached: img_1706512_4107.jpg (500x500, 58K)

They said specific patches. That doesn't necessarily mean deep. I don't know what exactly palemoon has changed internally with some of the libraries, but it's plausible they're all simple changes. Given that it is just a couple of guys, like you said, it seems unlikely that they would dramatically alter a bunch of libraries.

Because bots use Firefox 20-35 UAs so they think you are one. Normies don't know you're using palemoon, they just think you're browser is very outdated

Can someone give me an example of a cancer-ridden site to try this out on? I honestly don't know of a good one.

Just search some paraphilia (like bestialism lol) and click on random links.

Attached: bridget.jpg (1500x2099, 1.11M)

That guy's ok apart from using openbsd instead of actually practical OS's.

>muh precious babby syndrome from devs
I've seen it before but Moonchild being a precocious autistic furry and expecting to NEVER having to wrest control of the project to ANYONE EVER will probably be the death knell of a fairly gud idea for using a deprecated browser to leverage being able to use out of date plugins (aside from THE FUCKING MASSIVE SECURITY ISSUES that entails). Honestly if it wasn't such an embarrassing cringey shitshow it'd be quite entertaining to watch. As it is it's a txtbook eg. of
>Never let a control freak dev run a project on their own...

Oh well. kinda glad I meandered back over to chromium when i did.

Jow Forums.org

Attached: 117915145.afmwSnM7.AlteredBar_003100.jpg (685x1024, 116K)

Firefox Main, Pale Moon,and pretty much everything to do with Firefox or its forks is tainted with autism. You pretty much have to make something blink based for a browser to be good at this point.

Attached: 1453465651938.jpg (793x443, 83K)

will the browser molest my child?

dont bully sysadmin

What a fucking faggot lmao. That's the last straw. Dropping furfag gaymoon for icecat. I'll put up with the interface.

Can you tell me more about this? Searching "palemoon pedo" returns no results on the matter