MATE vs XFCE
Which do you choose?
MATE vs XFCE
David Cooper
Ian Parker
I prefer GNOME because it's stock and I don't care really, but if I must choose, then I would go with Xfce. It's programmed in C and embodies traditional UNIX philosophy.
Jace Reed
XFCE, more customizable, a bit more lightweight, much more themes and rice, also the most stable DE
MATE is pozzed by GTK3 and devs add retarded features, they also get cucked along their users by Gnomefaggotry
Jayden Sanders
XFCE is more flexible but they're both good.
Jace Cruz
KDE
Michael Sullivan
KDE
Jeremiah Clark
Between the two, definitely XFCE. It's the only desktop environment that offers a complete experience and is not bloated to hell.
I use it on my desktop at work and home, and i3 on my laptop.
Asher Lee
XFCE
Jack Bailey
> DE
Justin Cook
dwm
Tyler Wright
Cinnamon
Thomas Morgan
>XFCE
Jackson Diaz
Xfce
>easier to use
>more stable
>more lightweight
William Butler
I use systemd with emacs.
Connor Gomez
MATE. Xfce is stagnant, has tearing by default, doesn't support Wayland and has no drive behind it.
Ayden Fisher
MATE, because XFCE greets me with a crash after startup.
Jordan Davis
what did you do to break it?
Jack Lewis
Aiden White
It happens right after a fresh install.
Something with plymouth is wrong and I tried to fix it many different ways. Sometimes the error occurs, sometimes it doesn't.
I honestly don't need that shit, better install MATE and be done with this shit. It's not like there was much difference in usability anyway.
Nathaniel Clark
It's an old and common error. No idea why there was never an attempt to fix it.
Nathaniel Rodriguez
none, because no file picker.
Kevin Carter
Whatever DE Windows uses
Matthew Rogers
>there was never an attempt to fix it
Maybe the patches just got rejected
Cameron Garcia
XFCE, every time.