>c fags will defend this
C fags will defend this
Wyatt Gomez
Ryder Wright
>brainlet
Caleb Mitchell
This isn't even valid code.
Jack Morales
#include
int main(int argc) {
char *num;
switch(argc-1) {
if (0) {case 0: num = "Zero";}
if (0) {case 1: num = "Two";}
printf("%s\n", num);
break;
case 2:
printf("One\n");
}
return 0;
}
Jace Miller
You can assign a char* to a char const
Landon Martin
lel I switched One and Two, but anyway, this code compiles, you should try it out.
Ryan Gray
Why would you write it like that?
Nathaniel Clark
People should read this to understand C a bit better.
blog.robertelder.org
Alexander Johnson
char const *arr[] = {"zero", "one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "many"};
int count = argc < 7 ? 7 : argc;
--count;
puts(arr[count]);
Gabriel King
the fuck is the point of the if (0)
Nolan James
for coolness factor
Jose Long
ensures that none of the cases are executed. it's like a more efficent way of commenting out lines in a switch statement
Nathan Cooper
Stop writing bad code.
Josiah Baker
this is still wrong
Nolan Wilson
send(to, from, count)
register short *to, *from;
register count;
{
register n = (count + 7) / 8;
switch (count % 8) {
case 0: do { *to = *from++;
case 7: *to = *from++;
case 6: *to = *from++;
case 5: *to = *from++;
case 4: *to = *from++;
case 3: *to = *from++;
case 2: *to = *from++;
case 1: *to = *from++;
} while (--n > 0);
}
}
Grayson Rodriguez
>argc > 7
Ryan Walker
still not there kid, your getting close though
Blake Wright
>blog.robertelder.org
I like this guy.
Parker Evans
your wrong
Henry Phillips
no
Xavier Robinson
prove it
William Green
Holy fucking shit kill yourself
#include
void main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
printf("Number of arguments passed %d\n", argc);
}
Is it that hard.
Joseph Richardson
How would you do think in Rust then?
Jason Hernandez
too bad register variables get ignored most of the time nowadays :(
Josiah Parker
You can just use inline Assembly though?
Caleb Perez
yeah it works fine, i made you double check though lol B U S T E D
Benjamin Collins
It means only one of the `num = "..."` lines are executed, without just using `break;`, so that execution falls through to the printf statement for all those cases. The first one around "zero" is redundant though.
Aaron Parker
fn main() {
let args : Vec = std::env::args().collect();
println!("Called with {} arguments.", args.len());
}
Dylan Collins
Technically, shouldn't it be argc -1 if you wanted to count the number of arguments passed to the program, since the name of the program you're running is counted as an argument itself. Or at least it has been every time i've written C (argv[0] == name of the program, argv[1]..argv[n] == the parameters you are passing to the program)
Dylan Brown
meanwhile scheme fags will defend this
(let* ((yin
((lambda (cc) (display #\@) cc) (call-with-current-continuation (lambda (c) c))))
(yang
((lambda (cc) (display #\*) cc) (call-with-current-continuation (lambda (c) c)))))
(yin yang))
Isaiah Ward
fn main() {
println!("{}", std::env::args().count());
}
No.
Jordan Lewis
This is actually sensible, what is your problem?
Mason Peterson
Ah I forgot you could do that too, seems like I still have to work on my knowledge of Rust
Gabriel Lewis
That's why I love Go's inverted switch-case behaviour: cases break automatically unless you use the "fallthrough" keyword.
Aaron Allen
wrong
Justin Richardson
Of course D does it better.
import std.stdio;
void main(string[] args)
{
writeln(args.length, " arguments");
}
Matthew Adams
>if (0)
Jaxson Bell
>Not getting the purpose
Luke Price