I hate the default look of PuTTY. Post your PuTTY setup.
I hate the default look of PuTTY. Post your PuTTY setup
>he uses putty
just get a good colorscheme and change the font
What's the best alternative?
I use mobaxterm. Putyy is aids
openSSH client
Look up Solarized theme
mRemoteNG is cool too
I don't need putty because I don't use wintrash
putty is a great program that can be used for more than just SSH. If SSH is the only thing you are gonna use it for, then change to something else. If you want to deal with other stuff than just SSH, like COM for electronics, its a great program.
The bash that comes with git.
Looks like pajeet feature creep software. Is it at least portable?
ssh user@ip
telnet
mobaxterm
Yes its portable
Gee I can't get this to work on Windows
You're on W10, why wouldn't you just use the Linux Subsystem?
Use GNOME Terminal with Oh-My-Zsh. You can thank me later.
use cygwin
powershell
Not windows LOL
grab msys and install openssh
alternatives:
use OpenSSH in a bash shell from Windows Subsystem for Linux
use OpenSSH in a bash shell from cygwin or msys
use OpenSSH from powershell
The only time I'd ever use putty is if I'm using Windows, which I don't
Get off Jow Forums
have you tried KiTTY?
>using putty
>not cygwin with the real unix experience
Is cygwin any good? I could go back to windows if I could use lftp, SSH, fish shell, vim, youtube-dl, pip3, ranger, ncdu.
Windows Subsystem for Linux is better
>Windows Subsystem for Linux is better
please explain why
It's ok and easy to install. I use it for tmux.
>unironically using putty
holy shit, the absolute state of Jow Forums
Not him but:
-Cygwin package manager is awful, gimmie whatever comes with the distros any day of the week
-Cygwin requires things to be compiled specifically for windows, WSL just runs the same binaries made for ubuntu/centos/suse/whatever
-package selection is far larger because of that
-Mount points and filesystem hoopajoop seem saner and more compatible in WSL IMHO. To be fair, itll never be perfect because of how fundamentally different linux is with dealing with files, but its neater when the abstraction is made by the people who wrote the OS.
it's shit, same as WSL.
M$ cucks have been shilling it non-stop as if it was the greatest thing for people who just want basic Linux tools. GUESS WHAT, it can't even be used as a decent console. It has tons of problems, it's not practical, it lacks a lot of features, etc. Even git for window's bash console is more decent...
>-Cygwin package manager is awful, gimmie whatever comes with the distros any day of the week
apt-cyg
>-Cygwin requires things to be compiled specifically for windows, WSL just runs the same binaries made for ubuntu/centos/suse/whatever
not really an issue
most of the popular apps are in the repo
compiling stuff is a breeze on cygwin. It is a near-POSIX system. Very few gotchas.
>-package selection is far larger because of that
let me know what packages you have problems running on cygwin
>-Mount points and filesystem hoopajoop seem saner and more compatible in WSL IMHO. To be fair, itll never be perfect because of how fundamentally different linux is with dealing with files, but its neater when the abstraction is made by the people who wrote the OS.
I'll give you that though
>Even git for window's bash console is more decent...
sorry but no
What font is this?
cpmono
it's pretty shit for brackets tho
Wsl, or new prompt like cmder
zoc terminal
dont listen to this faggot. in my own personal experience i cant get half of the applications that require networking libs to work properly and the integration of programs displaying text in powershell or cmd is trash.
>not using an integrated term
y i k e s