SSD HELL

Just a friendly reminder that SSD's are not to be trusted
all SSDs still store data in electrical charges, which slowly leak over time if left without power. This causes worn out drives (that have exceeded their endurance rating) to start losing data typically after one (if stored at 30°C) to two (at 25°C) years in storage; Therefore, SSDs are not suited for archival purposes.

Attached: 1521038323854.jpg (175x231, 15K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/916373-pc/75506444
youtube.com/watch?v=xfFfQzELYHE
youtube.com/watch?v=FYfrC2kYbDc
richardkulisz.blogspot.com/2013/02/nuclear-industry-needs-more-accidents.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

People, just don't fucking bite.

Thank you for the PSA, captain obvious

1. gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/916373-pc/75506444

2. OP's mom gay.

/thread

>SSDs are not suited for archival purposes.
so don't use them for archival

Why would you use an SSD for archival purposes? It costs more an holds less.

>holds less
Well, at the consumer level anyway.

Attached: 50tb-ssd.jpg (2599x1063, 578K)

Those cost obscenely much. If you want to backup that much data, you'd do better with tape.

>SSDs
>archival
No one is doing this in the first place. Anyways 3-2-1 backups solve this long term and RAID solves this short term.

HDDs lose their data too since magnet
CDs degrade overtime as well..

There is not true long term storage beside on physical like paper