>16:10
>not 8:5
Is it joke?
16:10
Ryan Turner
Other urls found in this thread:
mentalfloss.com
twitter.com
Kevin Barnes
To the average Joe, a bigger number also means it's a better product.
Owen Evans
>8:5
>not 4:2.5
Jason Torres
not 1.6
Cooper Rogers
It's done for the same reason that your bag of cheetos cost $3.99 and not $4.00. People are simple minded and just see 16:10 > 16:9.
Chase Lewis
Lowest whole numbers or ratio to one on either side, any other ratio is retarded.
Jack Rodriguez
not 1.4:1
Grayson Kelly
>21:9
>not 7:3
what is this memery
David Cox
No, it's
>americans.jpg
Remember when that 1/3 pound burger failed, because americans thought it was SMALLER than a quarter pounder because 3
Luis Collins
this
Anthony Brown
>16:9
>not 4:3
Christopher Lopez
I don't remember that cuz I'm not american but thanks for story
Daniel Gonzalez
>16:10 > 16:9
it's true though
Thomas Evans
Glorious 21:9 ridiculousness
Aiden Foster
you must be very bad at fractions or something
Blake Martin
I got that reference ;^)
Zachary Diaz
>aplel
>anime gurl in corner
ugh...
Kayden Wright
David Bennett
>18:9
Not 2:1
Gabriel Walker
16:10 is just written that way to make it easier to compare to 16:9, the most common aspect ratio.
21:9 is actually 64:27, it's a simplification (off by about 1.5%) to make it easier to compare to 16:9. If you want to be autistic then insist on 64:27, not 7:3.
If 4:3 content was a new thing, it would be probably be written as 12:9 or 16:12.
Brody Long
God I thought you were talking about time here
Eli Morgan
>not π:r
Daniel Brown
Thanks user
Henry Bennett
>not 1.6:1
Eli Walker
Huh, now it makes way more sense
Carson Cox
>21:9 display, huh? nice, you can now fit more windows without reducing usability. so, what did you do with your extra 640 pixels of width?
>i've put anime girl in the corner and filled major part of display with empty divs of Jow Forums post boxes
i think problem might be you, not display. you're not supposed to use it in single-window mode
Sebastian Reyes
Its free real state