It's eks(X)86 cause 8086
And for(X)64 cause it "multiplies the registers" and the 64 is the result
Do you call it
Noah Smith
Adrian Thompson
x86 with 64-bit registers
Adrian Flores
EMT64
Josiah Davis
>couldn'tven get his meme right
It's EM64T, brainlet.
Carter Price
x86_64_128 when?
William Howard
I call it x86_64. I'm an AMD fanboy but people who aren't into this sort of thing tend to get confused when you call it AMD64 (they assume it's something AMD specific).
Mason Perez
After Chrome 1488, it will not fit in 2^64 bytes of memory.
Logan Fisher
AMD was one of the first to implement 64bit registers in 32bit architecture hence the name x86_64
They revisited and improved it and called it AMD64
THEN
Intel took it, revisioned and came up with it's implementation calling it IA64
If you want it should actually be eks(X)32(x)x64
Eks32for64 (for implied as 2*2)