Is Jow Forums using ipv6?

is Jow Forums using ipv6?
ipv6-test.com/
If so what speed?
ipv6-test.com/speedtest/

Attached: screenshot.png (575x329, 12K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teredo_tunneling
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

no, because I have my shit on more than one subnet and I can't be bothered to figure out how to request a /60 from my ISP (assuming they'd even give me more than a /64) and then split it up. I also have a hard time caring since I run most of my web browsing through a VPN provider that's v4-only anyway. Leaving it unconfigured means I don't have to worry about shit like v6 DNS leaks and the like.

No.

I'm posting from work, we now have an apex kek tier 15Mbit ADSL shitnet.
We will get a 21th century connection in next month, I hope that will come with IPv6 too.

At home my router and cable modem supports IPv6 just the faggot ISP hasn't enabled it for my area (I was at a small local ISP and they bought the "service area" I'm at from them a year ago).

WITNOATIFHJCC do you need more than a /120?

because all sorts of things break in non-obvious ways if you do anything with subnets smaller than a /64. SLAAC was a mistake.

SLAAC is optional though. You can disable it in your router advertisement and all devices will be forced to use dhcpv6

I think he's more worried about upstream networks/routers using SLAAC. And he'd be right.

This is why I'm using 6to4.

>IPv6
>Higher speed
Please explain.

Nah.
Don't need it, can't be bothered to get it working right with AT&T and a DD-WRT router.
If/when it's necessary I'm sure everyone will be over using this 6rd garbage and everything will just work. Until then whatever.

i cant

Attached: 1510941455500.jpg (500x400, 105K)

More sensible routing, less "junk" in the protocol (that needs handling), jumbo packet support, etc.

Unless you want your android phone to have IPv6 connectivity. Despite many requests for a DHCP6 client, google steadfastly insists that it's SLAAC or nothing.

Frankly, fuck Android.

Someone had to say it.

This might be a dumb question but will I get faster download speeds to my dedicated server if I used ipv6 to connect to it? The dedicated server has an Ipv6 and ipv4 address and I've always just used ipv4. I get about 20MB/s down when connecting to it now

Attached: speedtest.png (587x318, 16K)

neat

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-04-12 at 1.19.29 PM.png (1160x660, 56K)

Attached: Screenshot_20180412-183204.png (1080x1920, 102K)

Phone poster here

Attached: Screenshot_2018-04-12-15-22-00-930_com.android.browser.png (1080x1920, 126K)

No IPv6 here
Aus

Attached: speedtestipv4.png (611x363, 16K)

WTF I disabled IPv6 on network card, why is it working?

Attached: file.png (452x547, 66K)

Attached: file.png (1478x898, 75K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teredo_tunneling

I thought I read that W10 doesn't let you disable this and you have to break it at the router, like so much else about W10.

ipv6 is slower at home. Any network fag to explain why there can be such a difference ?

Attached: ipv4-ipv6.png (593x342, 13K)

It's called trolling

What's the point of this test? None of these speeds are even near my actual speed.
Cunt ISP doesn't have any IPv6 routers though so I'm stuck using 6to4 from my firewall. At least I have authority over the reverse DNS here.

Attached: 1523572787818.png (594x288, 9K)

Overhead because IPv6 headers are bigger, or because you're using teredo or 6to4 tunneling.
But most likely because this test is shit and unreliable.