Which Fedora should I choose?

Which Fedora should I choose?
Newb here.

Attached: ddd.png (262x195, 12K)

xfce

what in the fuck could possibly convince you to use fedora

what's wrong with Fedora?

Maybe he wants a up to date, easy to use system that doesn't use the garbage that is APT.
The only complaint is systemd, which is prevalent in a lot of other popular distros too. There's also the fact that Fedora is redhats bitch but that doesn't affect the user too much.

It's red hat's lab rat for red hat enterprise desu. But im ok with that, lot of interesting features to go around and try out

redhat botnet beta bitch distro with garbage release schedule

>every company that gets remotely big is botnet now
Not even fucking linux based companies are safe from this. This self-destructive nature is why you people will never grow past the 2%

I like MATE.
Xfce is too infrequently updated.

Kde

>clean install fedora on my laptop 3 years ago
>get a system error popup every time I log in
>start distro hopping again
>install the newest version of the m'lady distro
>get the same system error
>no other distro gives me this error
What a high-quality distribution

If you chose anything other than XFCE you're a fag.

KDE is a sane choice.

were you logging in as root?

Kde

Attached: 20180411-145311-s0nderbar-id2501462.jpg (803x645, 222K)

Surely a self declared noob is going to find APT limiting for their purposes (also implying it is inferior to whatever package manager RedHat is testing on their users today)

Does it even matter? Apt, Dnf, pacman, they are all used to the same end. I don't care which one I use as long as I can get shit done.

>doesn't use the garbage that is APT
>implying dnf is not a retarded abortion
>implying re-downloading package lists every time you run dnf is a great idea
>implying it's in any way better than yum or apt for that matter

Minimal with i3. Once you go to a tiling WM, you'll never go back

This.
KDE.

If your specs are super shit, go with MATE or LXQT.

Install (x)ubuntu, get familiar with GNU/Linux, switch to debian.

I think the same. No modern package manager is so much better than any other to warrant a switch from what you're accustomed to.

I got some questions about Fedora.
Does a PPA-like thing exists? I mean, if I want the latest versions of, let's say, LibreOffice on Fedora, what do I need to do?

How it behaves when you update from one version to another when you have a lot of those "PPA-like" added?

Also, Rawhide is the rolling version, right? Is it stable enough?

Attached: 1fff111.jpg (1080x1080, 297K)

Sugar.

He's not a south american peasant.

rpm fusion

>Does a PPA-like thing exists? I mean, if I want the latest versions of, let's say, LibreOffice on Fedora, what do I need to do?
Usually they update the software in the main repo, even if it takes a while. There is COPR for a direct PPA replacement, 3rd party repos like RPMFusion and flatpak. I use COPR for icon and themes, main repo + RPMFusion for usual stuff and flatpak for software that isn't available in either (RetroArch, updated OpenMW, Discord and Telegram atm)
>How it behaves when you update from one version to another when you have a lot of those "PPA-like" added?
It was fine when I jumped from 26 to 27, if the repo doesn't have a compatible version, it "disables" it when downloading the repolist and renables it when it gets updated. It doesn't seem to autoremove external software too, it kept Papirus and Neofetch which I installed from a COPR repo. Never tried fetching anything that messes with system components though.
>Also, Rawhide is the rolling version, right? Is it stable enough?
Never tried using Rawhide.

Attached: cutebirb.jpg (700x779, 154K)

Thanks!

Attached: 1485443798624.jpg (1000x800, 61K)

Did you had tried that? Works pretty well and really comfy.

KDE OpenSuse TubleWEED

Attached: 1521748432634-pol.png (453x567, 110K)

>Did you had tried that?
what the fuck are you even saying

XFCE is stable.

rawhide works fine if you don't use a d
DE

>implying RPM is any better

/thread

>redhat botnet
Proof? It's fully FOSS, you should be able to find the botnet.
>beta
More than likely more stable than whatever Ubuntu fork you use.
>garbage release schedule
CentOS exists for people like you who enjoy using Linux 3 in 2018.

Copr repos, or any rpm repo for your distro, are what you want.

>CentOS
still a botnet

>beta
beta as in soyboy, loser, non alpha

>still a botnet
Still zero (0) proof of this claim, despite having the entire source code 2 clicks away.

>beta as in soyboy, loser, non alpha
Aah, so just a good old not-an-argument.

Use Solus or OpenSUSE Tumbleweed instead