This thread is about the appreciation of horology, as well as the micro-engineering and materials engineering that are required to make a fine watch, clock, or other timepiece.
Well I can tell you the story of this one. It lost its crystal at some point and got thrown into the drawer, and over the years a balloon decomposed an melted onto the right side of the dial.
the text of the LCD looks really different to my authentic GW-M5610 think it's a fake
Christian Adams
because I'm an autist who overthinks things the tiny little letters at the bottom of the glass seem different to photos I've seen
Asher Gomez
It’s the 60th anniversary railmaster. 8806 movement. Only 38mm too!
Wyatt Gray
that watch has an entirely different module
Ian Diaz
guess that makes sense I would have assumed they used the same font across all of their G-Shock LCDs
Brayden Gomez
(same of) Obviously it's different, there isn't the same module as said Where did you buy it?
Ryan Jones
How hard would it be for me to regulate my 2824 watch if I'm a complete novice and a retard? It's running about 15-20 seconds fast per day at the minute.
All you really need is a case back wrench and a small screw-driver to turn the micro-adjuster (the small slotted screw near the balance wheel) , but it will be a pain to dial it in if you have to use your phone and an app to try and listen to the timing rate.
Because low end Japanese movements don't have micro-adjusters and regulating by moving the regulator arm is way more difficult to dial in.
A lot of things with wristwatches lie back to WW1 and officers/gentry. The watch would be worn on the left so they could see the time and use their pistol at the same time. The crown would be on the outside so it would be easier to wind the watch while it's on your wrist.
There are ofcourse now plenty of watches with off-set crowns or crowns on the inside of the wrist. The Pelagos LHD for example.
Jacob Morgan
Because it literally doesn't matter unless you wear your watch on your hand.
Leo Kelly
Does Citizen have something similar to Seiko's MM300?
Not necessarily automatic, but something iconic and relatively upscale with insane craftsmanship and value?
Doesn't have to be a diver.
James Russell
We back, boys?
Eli Thomas
Sort of
William Flores
I see the image server is still down. Post what you're wearing then. >Solar Soyko
Noah Campbell
> accutron 230
Jackson Butler
>back online >image uploading doesn't work yet >can't post black bay images ?
i'm sure you'd be nervous showing yourself off looking like that and wearing a woman's watch
Samuel Howard
The Promaster range is probably the equivalent.
Lincoln Hall
I like dress watches. I have a SARB033. I'm thinking my next watch will be an Oyster Perpetual. After that, what would be the next step up?
Brayden Parker
Why are Tissot and Frederique Constant so underrated? They make a lot of nice looking Swiss Made watches at good prices.
They are better value than Seiko.
Evan Miller
a vostok make the full loop
Lincoln Hill
Got me a Lord Quartz! I’m finding nothin possible to find a strap for it which will look good. Black leather doesn’t quite cut it... Would Milanese work?
Chase Howard
I don't understand why people do that, seems like it would constantly be in the way. One would think it would be apparent that they're wearing it wrong.
Christopher Mitchell
Hamilton Accumatic VIII-B
Jonathan Bell
(You)
Carter Turner
Looking for a relatively burly-looking beater.
>love the MM300 >afraid it looks a bit too much like a bigger, blingier Submariner homage
>love the quartz Seiko Tuna for having a character and history all its own, cannot be mistaken for another Sub homage >afraid I'll hate the TICK-TICK-TICK of a quartz
help me
Austin Price
Spring drive tuna.
Camden Ward
Those are even bigger than the quartz ones though. 2mm bigger in diameter, and almost 2mm thicker.
Anthony Bailey
Get an automatic baby tuna?
Kevin Cox
Really don't like the look of those.
John Kelly
What’s wrong with the site?
When can I post photos of my nubile girlfriend again?