Does anybody actually use Windows Outlook?

Does anybody actually use Windows Outlook?
What benefits does it actually have?

Attached: asdf.png (960x720, 512K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/uYWQAg12Ko0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

What kind of retard would give the flute the third kid

amartya sen prescribes minimizing injustice in society by giving the marginalized more opportunities. So C is the answer

B.
Anything else is shit.
It is misleading you into thinking not wanting the government stealing your hobbywork is communist

>shadman

Social justice wankers.

"I have done nothing to earn the flute. I don't play the flute, and I contributed nothing to its materials or manufacture. If you give it to me I will likely destroy or discard it as I place no value on it as it was given to me for free."

A. She has the talent to play the flute, hence I'm making a monetary investment into her future that's has a higher return than the other two girls' returns. Also, why can't B and A form a business relationship whereby B makes flutes for A and A gives her money for her service? Seems kinda dumb to me since B can't play the flute, A can and A can use the flute to give her the money for the flute.

What if I put the flute in my bum

B, because B made it and then I'd take everyone to my home to give them pizza and make some photos for 8ch/b

A is the only way we get music. Anything else is a waste. A should buy the flute from B though.

B made the flute though, you're literally stealing from someone who put time, money and effort into creating the flute and then giving it to someone else for free.

Left is fascism, middle is capitalism, right is communism.

Is that cropped porn

This

I use Outlook for work. Most of the functionality you have in Thunderbird too, just meeting room booking and stuff like that, you won't find in Thunderbird. I personally don't like Outlook, it's slow, the search function is god awful, etc.

If you don't work in an company that wants to run enterprise IT i think it's not worth the money. There are less expensive, free or open source variants that are just as good/bad or even better in some regards.

I use outlook on both Windows and Android
Really I just like the way it feels more than Thunderbird, it's an email client and doesn't need much attention
also all my email accounts are live/hotmail

I'd give my flute to girl A since she can play it, if you know what I mean

I sell it to whoever will pay for it. I don't care who has it in the end.

I have seen the errors of my ways. Forgive me, sensei. In that case, why not just give to B so she can sell it to A like says? Seems pretty stupid to get sentimental about something you can't even use properly when someone else can.

>Left is fascism, middle is capitalism, right is communism.
That's why A is the correct answer. Assuming B and A could not come to some sort of voluntary market arrangement (which must be the case since evidently I've been called in to mediate the situation) the flute should go to A since that will maximize potential of the most worthwhile of the three. If B makes flutes with no intention of using or selling them, the flute making activity is worthless to society.

B unless B already has many identical flutes already

Attached: photo.jpg (100x100, 5K)

Logically A should end up with the flute, but it shouldn't be taken for free from B. Therefore since the situation implies that I came into possession of the flute with none of the three girls receiving compensation, I should return it rightfully to B.

otherwise I would give it to C
fuck A, she is an entitled piece of shit

Attached: 1279800241866.png (624x444, 189K)

>be B
>make flute
>then have to separately buy the flute in order to have it
That's communism user

B

C would ruin it because poor people can't take care of their property. A would use it to create music, and therefore improve society.

That's exactly how poor people think. A has at least made the effort to learn the flute. C has literally done nothing whatsoever but still believes she deserves it. That's the fucking definition of entitlement.

After working with both ends of the spectrum (and growing up comfortably middle class) I can definitely say that poor people have a massive sense of entitlement.

Well the prompt says you have possession over it for whatever reason. I don't understand why if she made it, I'm just going with it.

wrong, it's capitalism
>be 5 year old chink gril out in bumfuck kamchatka
>work in labour chair sweatshop 23 hours a day and get paid 0.05 cents on the hour
>have to buy chair in the end to get an hours worth of rest

>shadman

B or C could totally learn how to play the flute
unless B has tons of identical flutes already (and no intended new use for this one) then B deserves it

> That's communism
> programmers who have made Windows don't own the right to distribute it as their own work and it's communism
Nah.

>Comparing a situation where you have a finite supply of an item ad can make a finite supply of it (and the item must change hands in a transaction) to when you can technically make unlimited copies of it and still have the original copy there

Attached: > > >.png (1778x2014, 2.81M)

No it just means she has a contract to make flutes for a third party.
You do now that when we say "i work for x" it means "i'm being paid to produce for x" ,right user?

B shares with A, C gets fucked in the ass

> chink kids who have made h&m hoodies don't own the right to wear them and it's communism
Better now?
inb4 "China is commie and therefore it's communism"
> C gets fucked in the ass
Only C?

That's a good example.

B and C also "share" if you get what i mean

C isn't communism.
Marx wouldn't have supported C, and under any actual implementation of communism, none of them get the flute and you keep it for yourself.

I keep the fucking flute. There probably was a reason why I took it in the first place.
That or I sell it and use the money to motivate B to make more flutes.

took me a while to find it

Attached: .jpg (1000x2315, 928K)

Attached: 1523001255746.png (960x720, 137K)

>That or I sell it and use the money to motivate B to make more flutes.

How does you stealing from B motivate her to make more flutes?

it's not stealing, it's your fucking flute for whatever reason isn't included in the prompt

She says "I provided the materials for it". I took it to imply that she made it independently, since in the majority of cases third parties provide the materials.

Of course, you could still be right, but given that we're given no indication that that's the case I feel like it's a bit of a stretch. On the other hand, if we're employing her, that would explain why we have the flute - but then we already paid her and she has literally no claim to the flute, so that's retarded as well.

A or C are correct answers. B is the worst choice possible.

No it isn't, B's description clearly implies that its hers and she didn't willingly give it to you or anyone else.

B was pretty dumb if she made the flute and can't play it.
A can play it, B can listen to A play the fruits of her labor. So can C.

youtu.be/uYWQAg12Ko0

>B was pretty dumb if she made the flute and can't play it.
You think she just made it for no reason? She obviously had a plan for it. She was going to learn how to play it, or sell it.

You don't know shit

The thing is thought that B can create more flutes just like that one. So, probably for a price or (if B is feeling generous, for free), A can get a flute while B can as well.

A marxist

Explain marxist please
I need a good laugh

how do you know she's not saying that to convince you to give it to her

The Communist Manifesto

That could go for the two others as well so if you doubt the texts you might as well just roll a dice to decide who gets it

...

Post the original next time faggot

Attached: 1522731567641.jpg (960x720, 114K)

Explain where my taxes are going in my first-world capitalist country

Why is A sweating so much?

NWO

Man you dumb fucks are dumb
- B owns the flute. End of story. Get bent.
- A has talent? Demonstrate it, bitch, then get someone to invest in you and buy you the flute off of B.
- C is the poorest? Should be given an *equal* chance as other members of society to unfuck herself.
- Philanthropic cunts could invest in a "teach the poor fucks to suck on a flute" center, and use C's currently worthless time into getting her to A's level. She'd feel more fulfilled anyway, we've evolved as a species such that the majority feels bad when they're useless, though the increasing abundance of distractions is fucking that up.

This is real life, you fucking idiots.
You've got to balance the needs of the many and the needs of the few, and sheltered housewife "moral" dilemmas are counter-productive compared to teaching you idiots how not to be retarded SJWs or 'unregulated free market' boot lickers.

how is A fascism?
read a book or two.

no you dense fuck it's going to the homeless on the dole

[citation needed]

She doesn't believe she deserves it. You are being triggered by the existence of poverty. Perhaps you should become an Marxist and eradicate poverty forever. Then you wouldn't throw a paddy when a cartoon girl suggests that happiness is the most noble pursuit in society.

Flute practice.

That state budget is public.

>C would ruin it because poor people can't take care of their property
This is the beauty of non-'gibmedat' systems.
Work X hours cleaning gutters and shit to EARN the money to buy a flute.
Then, do whatever the fuck you want with it, you choose how much you respect your own time.

This is why one should avoid gifts, unless they do not care what happens with said gift.

This is not a citation.

I keep the flute.

Same thread on Jow Forums made me reinstall. Fuck

And this isn't a scientific thesis. I'm saying if you want to know where the money goes you can just go check.

It's not exactly going to the homeless, but it's going to a bunch things not worth it's weight.

Attached: U.S._Federal_Spending_Kinda fucking ridiculous.png (960x720, 117K)

I use Outlook a lot.
I have a dozen of email addresses, and it's a great way to keep everything organized.

It's pretty good.

1) A woman
2) A weakling
3) A communist
4) A marxist

You made a claim.
The onus is on you to prove it, otherwise it's just the usual baseless garbage that armchair politicians clueless about actual budget balancing spout.
Now that's moving in the right direction.
>not exactly going to the homeless
ok, so we can assume the initial poster was (un)intentionally misleading or outright lying.
>but it's going to a bunch things not worth it's weight
Would you like to be a bit more specific with your vague accusations?
And perhaps propose an alternative that has better than a snowball's chance in hell of working?

>>not exactly going to the homeless
>ok, so we can assume the initial poster was (un)intentionally misleading or outright lying.
>>but it's going to a bunch things not worth it's weight
For everyone playing at home, note the subtle goal post moving.

>You made a claim.
No, I didn't. I am not

Also saying it goes the the NWO is the first claim made in this conversation.

I ain't the guy you were talking to first though. Just a nosy cunt.

Attached: 2018-04-14-064615_1366x768_scrot.png (1366x768, 146K)

>aying it goes the the NWO is the first claim made in this conversation.
Absolutely. And it's just as baseless, but a lot more over the top so fewer people will think it's serious.
>No, I didn't. I am not
Good point. I should've said "that dumb fuck in >>postnumber made the claim"
Cheers for the feedback, it'll improve my posts.

> SHADMAN
H
A
D
M
A
N

A is capitalism
B is communism
C is social democracy

A is urAnus
B is muh dick
C is cunt

Attached: geoffrey.png (552x654, 451K)

>
>B made the flute though, you're literally stealing from someone who put time, money and effort into creating the flute and then giving it to someone else for free.

>The labourer makes something yet the profits go to his boss

>unteralterbach
kek

>The bottom right corner

commies.

B
If A can play the flute she probably already has one. If B made it and wants it she should have it. I see no reason to give the flute to C unless A or B would just throw the flute away

Judging by the pictures I don't think this is about an actual musical instrument.

>B is communism

>I provided the materials for it. I spent time and effort making it.

How the fuck is keeping your shit instead of letting the government give it to someone else communism?

B; she owns the flute so she can do what she wants with it. Convincing B to sell the flute to A though is the best option; A can actually use the flute, B is compensated for her work and can always make another one and they can both improve their respective skills as a result. C has absolutely nothing and a flute a child made is not going to improve her situation.

Because you get the fruit of your labour instead of the your employer (nor the state, since there is no state). The basic principle of communism is the labor theory of value which is basically what B says.

>Because you get the fruit of your labour instead of the your employer
Maybe she is self employed?

You're missing that she paid for the materials to make the flute. She's her own employer. The teacher in this example is the government, not the employer.

>Does anybody actually use Windows Outlook?
Anybody and everybody that has a regular office job

>shadman
Child B seems to have made the flute of her own volition and provided all of the materials so she has ownership of it and it is wholly her flute to do with as she pleases whether that be selling it to A or giving it to C or keeping it for herself. Where is the contention here? Plus I've got another flute for A and C to play with.

What is social security?