Post the best books (max 3) for a specific topic

Post the best books (max 3) for a specific topic
>C++

Attached: 112.png (773x499, 442K)

Other urls found in this thread:

icube-icps.unistra.fr/img_auth.php/d/db/ModernC.pdf
en.cppreference.com/w/c
amazon.com/Design-Patterns-Smalltalk-Companion/dp/0201184621
adam.chlipala.net/cpdt/cpdt.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Attached: p.png (492x650, 148K)

Any one has a great up to date book on php? Most books cover 5.4 or under...

You forgot the third.

Attached: 1520178977088_0.jpg (557x800, 193K)

The book is actually bad. I wouldn't recommend it. It lacks exercises and doesn't go very far, it barely explains Monads, which is like half of haskell. Pretty pictures might attract noobies, but it's a bad book. Haskell from First Principles followed by Concurrent programming in Haskell is the way to go. Might as well read Typeclassopedia in-between them.

Vidya Dev books?

>C

Modern C by Jens Gustedt icube-icps.unistra.fr/img_auth.php/d/db/ModernC.pdf
K&R
This website en.cppreference.com/w/c

Attached: 58128.jpg (318x368, 26K)

It should be using namespace std and c++17

Does anybody have any good books on HTML and CSS? I know the obvious basics, but I would like to get a more exhaustive understanding. But all the books I found seem to be hot garbage.

Books for learning vi, vim and related editors.

Attached: vim_books.png (774x584, 320K)

is that the face you make when you use vim?

It's your face when you realize the power of such editors.

fair enough

Attached: art_of_deal_fb.png (1200x629, 879K)

Good books I have the right one

>starsoup
No

Attached: cpp_desu.jpg (1440x810, 155K)

Which one do you like?

>GNU/Linux

Attached: Linux_books.png (1494x978, 289K)

I don't understand the meme cover

t. currently on chapter 5 of this book

My interpretation: C++ is a raging forest fire that nobody, not its creator nor a random scrub like the reader can truly understand and control.

I thought it might of had something to do with C++ dying (the fire) and stroustrup trying to put it out/revive it with a watering can (the C++11 and 14 updates)

Attached: 1522098132062.png (671x519, 146K)

Is this book actually good? Are design principles themselves worthwhile? Or is it just shit made for Java brainlets?

Yes, design patterns are worth to study. Then you choose if you wanna use them or not.
That book is not actually good, but it's better than the gang of four one old garbage.

amazon.com/Design-Patterns-Smalltalk-Companion/dp/0201184621

>personal computers

Attached: Image.png (510x642, 554K)

>pic
>automate the boring stuff

fug

Attached: lrg.jpg (500x656, 128K)

It might look a bit cartoonish, but honestly it's rather goood. The whole thing behind the "goofy book full of clip-art and captions" is that weird stuff sticks in your mind more - the actually theory is spot on.

Monads are so not half of Haskell... That's like saying stream overloading is half of C++.

Pic related is the best intro for coq outside of notes from ÉNS.
That book doesn't aim to do anything close to the books you mentioned. It's a glorified hello world tutorial - more appropriate alternative is real world haskell.

Attached: images.jpg (830x1080, 71K)

The comfiest book I've ever read.

Attached: the_c_programming_language_2nd_edition.jpg (379x499, 33K)

This annoys the brainlet, fags and soyboys

Attached: 518yVM9PmGL._SX382_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (384x499, 35K)

"""""Hard Way"""""
Some worst books even write.

Free legal link, autor page.
adam.chlipala.net/cpdt/cpdt.pdf

+1 triggered soyboy

Attached: 1507682821744.jpg (573x430, 34K)

I've read some chapters of both. Unfortunately I had to stop learning c++ to learn c# instead, but the books are nice

Attached: 51qtp4NzjRL._SX397_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (399x499, 30K)

Just because it's called "hard" doesn't mean it's good. Or hard. His python might have been good when he first published it, but he shouldn't ever mention the C book to anyone if he wants to be taken seriously.
King's C for millenials, for pretentious idiots who don't mind using outdated techniques and finally, the standard for people who actually want to learn C.

Attached: 7E2A4691C08D4C92AAA44980D08F7DE3.gif (240x228, 858K)

Make your power rankings for Computer book publishing series or companies:

>Great Tier
O'Reilly (animal series)
Developer's Library

>Good Tier
Manning's
No Starch (OS books)
Pragmatic Programmers

>Mediocre Tier
Honestly, most textbooks
Apress
No Starch (Programming books)
Wrox Press

>Garbage Tier
Springer (there are several; but all of them are pure evil that should shunned as much as possible)
O'Reilly (Head First)
Sams (X in N U | X = language/technology, N = some positive integer, U = some unit of time)
For Dummies
Complete Idiot's Guide

>Kill Yourself Tier
No Starch (Manga books) - not good manga and won't get jack shit about the subject it teaches. Also ,

Attached: Programming-816.jpg (770x524, 85K)