Is D-Bus harmful?

Is D-Bus harmful?

Attached: fig.gif (123x134, 415K)

no

yes

maybe

I don't know

Yes it is.

No it is not.

absolutely

doubtfully

Nah

It might be. It might be not.

Can you repeat the question?

Yah

What's the question?

Who?

Perhaps.

Define harmful. Define D-Bus

Perhaps not.

Bitch I might be.

Attached: diagram.png (842x595, 77K)

What's a bus?

Wow. Wtf is wrong with Jow Forums.

soy

what happened to normal unix IPC

by the standard of that one guy who killed himself, definitely

Very harmful

Actually yes. It's absolute bloat that offers nothing whatsoever.

Actually no. It's absolute minimalism and offers everything to everyone.

>minimalism
>everything
delet this

Not necessarily for desktop stuff. But it's way too verbose and it really shouldn't be in init.

What's a dbus

Si senor

it's a largely needless and poorly designed abstraction layer on top of unix sockets, so yes

Wasn't KDbus supposed to replace it?
Meaning systemd* components actually can rely on it as a alternative?
I want healthy competition.

>kdbus
>healthy competition
KDbus was dbus implemented in kernel space. It would not have been healthy competition because it would have meant that only systemd would be able to serve dbus to user space.

I don't think so. I might be wrong tho

ok