Is D-Bus harmful?
Is D-Bus harmful?
no
yes
maybe
I don't know
Yes it is.
No it is not.
absolutely
doubtfully
Nah
It might be. It might be not.
Can you repeat the question?
Yah
What's the question?
Who?
Perhaps.
Define harmful. Define D-Bus
Perhaps not.
Bitch I might be.
What's a bus?
Wow. Wtf is wrong with Jow Forums.
soy
what happened to normal unix IPC
by the standard of that one guy who killed himself, definitely
Very harmful
Actually yes. It's absolute bloat that offers nothing whatsoever.
Actually no. It's absolute minimalism and offers everything to everyone.
>minimalism
>everything
delet this
Not necessarily for desktop stuff. But it's way too verbose and it really shouldn't be in init.
What's a dbus
Si senor
it's a largely needless and poorly designed abstraction layer on top of unix sockets, so yes
Wasn't KDbus supposed to replace it?
Meaning systemd* components actually can rely on it as a alternative?
I want healthy competition.
>kdbus
>healthy competition
KDbus was dbus implemented in kernel space. It would not have been healthy competition because it would have meant that only systemd would be able to serve dbus to user space.
I don't think so. I might be wrong tho
ok