Imagine if cuckBSD didn't exist

>implying they would risk it
even small shitty little projects like retroarch are able to protect their code from chink faggots trying to sell bootleg consoles.
Also I've interacted with linus a number of times, and he's very pleasant as long as you're not clinically retarded.

they don't steal it, they use it - or at least that's what the license allows
unpublished modifications are allowed by the gpl
it's just that if they distribute the binary in any form they must also provide the source code but they're welcome to change the code as they like for internal use and keep it secret

so they can't do what sony did with the playstation since playstation is shipped with the binary so the source would have to be provided

Linux will never be what FreeBSD is
your classical distro is an ugly assembly of different parts developed by different people, which as a strategy is more prone to bugs and weird compatibility issues than a single, monolithic OS developed by professionals who have worked with Unix at the time when Linus was peeing in his pants
over-yonder.net/~fullermd/rants/bsd4linux/01

Attached: LinusYoung.jpg (640x439, 28K)

>unironically being autistic
there's a reason linux is actually used in real environments while bsd is only used by autists and hobbyists
if you want to use bsd just swallow the entire cock and buy a macbook

i'm not gay to use OS X

>i have a girlfriend
from what anime?

She is real, we actually met at a local open source conference but i'm still trying to make her use FreeBSD instead of Arch

>weird compatibility issues
oh you mean the ones that freebsd has with any filesystem made after 1995?
Or the issues that freebsd has with driver support?
What about the compatibility issues that freebsd has with straight white men?

Attached: 1523840366994.png (1280x720, 1.05M)

user, fat men in dresses can't be your "girlfriend"

>file systems
Why would you use a fs different than ZFS?
>driver support
Oh, sure, i can imagine how confusing is the lack of plug-and-play experience
>white men
We don't have anything against them, it is all a wrong interpretation by the same people who use Jow Forums

because ext4 and btrfs are better in every single way.
nigger don't even fuck try that shit with me, freebsd has GARBAGE driver support and I refuse to spend days trying to get hardware acceleration working.
read the code of conduct.
fuck off with your bullshit OS that exists only to be a framework for easy botnet creation.
You faggots literally destroyed technology

>effectively eliminating botnets
implying you can't run the Facebook botnet on a Linux or Windows server

>your classical distro is an ugly assembly of different parts developed by different people
And that's what makes it unique, faggot. Tens of thousands of people contribute to the code, and everyone that modifies it has to provide the modifications to the public so they don't get cucked like BSshit

>>NSA wouldn't have the networking stack to enforce the mass spying
NSA and all US intelligence agencies use Linux.

theregister.co.uk/2015/07/08/evil_nsa_runs_on_saintly_red_hat_enterprise_linux_apache/
igurublog.wordpress.com/2014/04/08/julian-assange-debian-is-owned-by-the-nsa/

No you really can't

>ext
How is it any different from UFS2? Literally ''developed'' in 1992

stability for one thing
Also it's cute of you to ignore the rest of my points, typical bsdnigger

>Also it's cute of you to ignore the rest of my points, typical bsdnigger
Well let me refute a few more

>fuck off with your bullshit OS that exists only to be a framework for easy botnet creation.
*blocks ur path*

>nigger don't even fuck try that shit with me, freebsd has GARBAGE driver support and I refuse to spend days trying to get hardware acceleration working.
werks4me

Attached: linux_botnet.jpg (800x799, 16K)

yeah well not everyone uses a 10 year old memepad
Also the fact that you can debloat android exists because it's using linux. If android was freebsd based it would have been completely closed off.
Google doesn't like that you can debotnet android, hence why they're developing fuchsia OS, and I'm willing to bet money it's going to be freebsd based and closed off. thanks again cuckniggers

For starters, ext4 has real extents and doesn't have the soft update brain-damage that FreeBSD's UFS2 is infamous for. I mean, NetBSD eventually dropped the soft updates altogether because it added a lot of complexity and corner cases for very questionable gains.

>bsdcucks

Attached: 1388675712379.png (1069x1081, 812K)

>Also the fact that you can debloat android exists because it's using linux.
Everything but the kernel is apache licensed. You don't remember the proprietary android 3.0? lol
theregister.co.uk/2011/03/31/google_clamps_down_on_android_partners/

>Everything but the kernel is apache licensed. You don't remember the proprietary android 3.0? lol
>but the kernel
>kernel
I don't see how google's userland has anything to do with linux

FreeBSD has had journaling on ufs2 since version 9
freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-gjournal.html

OpenBSD is the only BSD without a modern file system :^)

GPL vs BSD is a consumer vs producer issue. the gpl protects the lazy parasitic user while the BSD protects the creative and productive producer side. I side with BSD because I'm a creator and not a larping faggot who installs gentoo all day to fap to trap porn and cry about muh freedoms

Linux therefor has nothing to do with being able to bebloat android. They don't even stop proprietary drivers that would allow lineageos to use mainline kernels!

>BSD protects the creative and productive producer side
Except that you get your code stolen by proprietary companies. GPL ensures your code is free and protected. I guess BSD is better if you want to leech off of other people's work.

>>anything not based on windows would be forced to release their source, effectively eliminating botnets as long as you left windows
>What is Apache?
If FreeBSD didn't exist everyone would just straight System V, or switch over to pure Mach kernel OSes.

how is linux responsible for google's userland
are you retarded?

Yeah, but IIRC the journaling in FreeBSD was implemented in an ass-backward way so you can end up with data loss even though the metadata act like the affected blocks have been properly written.

>reddit
>linux
Proof or didn't happen

So you admit linux can't stop a botnet from running on it :^)

Stop

>random android usually hackable
>PS3 got a hack and Sony got assblasted
>also ran linux, not BSD
The irony.

>Jow Forums uses FreeBSD
>Reddit uses Linux
Like pottery

>proof or didn't happen

>no botnets
What? You don't have to release all your sources just because you're running a GPL os.
I don't really have a problem with BSD. They have some wrong opinions but still a member of the open source family.