1.1.1.1

How did they do it?
It realy feels faster.

Attached: 20180427_070715.png (720x959, 115K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

What do you mean it "feels" faster?

Post results retard

by having a lot of servers spread all over the world, meaning they have servers that are closer to you than other dns providers

OP is retarded

Linus said so!

How do you "switch you DNS directory"?

Just out of curiosity, I changed my DNS to this meme and it didn't change anything.

I test it with two browsers using two different speed test testing sites over the course of an hour or so.

It didnt change shit. This is like when they post Microsoft Edge being 24% faster than Chrome/Firefox. Means fuck all.

That just means you default DNS had a server that was already close to your location.

I don't know, OP. It's almost as if sending ones and zeroes as light waves in a series of tubes between two computers is faster the closer they are on the physical plane of existence.

Attached: 1501245744766.png (612x491, 106K)

By having a DNS server in my city.

why the fuck do you think I care about 30ms? i don't give a shit if exhentai resolves a whole THREE, count 'em, THREE hundredths of a second slower. i'm also not going to give the cloudflare botnet even more info about my fapping habits.

You might not care but I care when I get to see my doujins 30ms faster.

>not wanting the bot net know you read stuff like shindol and fatalpulse

slower where I am. by 4ms.

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=252 time=22.7 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=252 time=22.7 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=252 time=23.0 ms


64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=252 time=20.8 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=252 time=20.6 ms

64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=252 time=20.5 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=252 time=20.7 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=252 time=20.9 ms


hmm

>faster cuz nobody uses it

dns doesn't increase your fucking web speed dumbass, it's one lookup then cached.

Anybody knows how to change to this DNS, i changed via LAN adapter in my computer but do i have to change it in browser too?

mainstream is back to selling snake oil, IT goes in circles every 10 years

>testing dns response time with icmp
do you feel alright? you might wanna sit down and relax for a second, take a deep breath, take your meds

this reminds me of people thinking if they changed the DNS server on their PS4s they could increase their download speeds.

kek

Attached: `12e`2r1`2.png (1387x589, 987K)

;; Query time: 20 msec
;; SERVER: 4.2.2.2#53(4.2.2.2)
;; WHEN: Fri Apr 27 01:11:30 CDT 2018
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 55


;; Query time: 23 msec
;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1)
;; WHEN: Fri Apr 27 01:11:19 CDT 2018
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 135

why are you so angry?

slow af

$ dig imsosmart.co.ke @1.1.1.1
;; Query time: 731 msec
;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1)

prove me wrong.

it's a direct pipeline to nsa servers. cisco is 1 hop, goog 2 hops

kys

Remember to mix mint and sage into post recipe if you must reply, then hide thread. Help rid Jow Forums of cancer.

Nah they have their own servers embedded with and directly connected to Google, your ISP's, ect... server farms.

are you ok?

Pretty good.
Definitely faster than my ISP's shit.

Attached: sage.png (1156x2031, 290K)

Not running your own DNS resolver with a raspberry pi... SAD!

>in memory data cache
>the best geolocated servers
>udp logging of statistics

it wont affect a speed test, idiot. It would improve latency and shit like flipping between tabs.

DNS performance is overrated, the IP of any domain is cached in your browser once you obtain it from the DNS server, subsequent http requests use the cached value, that's why you will never feel any difference between any 2 respectable DNS servers

look at chrome://net-internals/#dns if you're using chrome

botnet

feels faster desu

>feels faster

Attached: 1492128889560.png (400x550, 182K)

>How did they do it?
They made their own graph, its not hard.

Checked

I saw the Linus video too.
I'm currently sending all my shit to Google, is it really any different if I send it to cloudflair?
When they come to throw me in the gulag, will it matter who took the silver and sold me out?
I'm going to give it a try unless some kind user here has good reason to not.

Attached: 1523372516223.png (610x783, 173K)

How does the DNS resolver get addresses?

should have been first post

Attached: lies.png (736x441, 81K)

Actually no. 8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4 has EDNS support, white CF DNS does not. It’ll make your browsing slow as shit on many CDN networks like Akamai which rely on EDNS for directing the user to the correct content node. This is not a problem if you are using your ISPs DNS also.

Maybe you should take yours, because there's nothing wrong with what he did.

>measuring DNS resolve times with ping
retard

>internet been garbage for a few days since the ISP is working on our line
>watching a youtube video for 2 min requires buffering for 5 minutes
>but reloading a page is instant and the video recommendations load in at once, even if the video itself doesnt since the stream request takes forever to go through
I like it

How do I measure speed?

50 milliseconds holly shit!!!
what the fuck am i going to do with so much time now?

>Using DNS
You wouldn't have this issue if you just kept an up to date hosts file.

use that time improving your life instead of continued shitposting on Jow Forums

done

>voluntarily signing up for a global adversary's DNS
lmaoing @ you're life choices

You do know they support secure DNS so it's actually less botnet

how does it feel?

Botnet.

For some reason when I use 1.1.1.1 it always routes through Australia even though I'm in the USA.

it actually depends on your location
in some places google's faster, in others cloudflare

pro tip: 8.8.4.4 and 1.0.0.1 have very low-loads and are faster than the main ones

1.1.1.1 is by cloudflare and cloudflare uses the best programming languages and stuff, not stupid things like python.

>At Cloudflare we're extensively using the Go programming language

There's no disadvantage to this so why not?

>voluntarily staying with your ISPs botnet dns

>How did they do it?
Hire competent network engineers.
Have a lot of money.

My ISP = 6 ms
1.1.1.1 = 4 ms
8.8.8.8 = 3 ms
botnet always wins

>How did they do it?
Probably using MPLS in a way to reduce the routing time, but they could also have caches (CDN) in Tier 1 ISPs to speed up things.
>It realy feels faster.
It's fucking micro seconds. Off course it doesn't matter. Pure placebo...
You fucking browser keep a cache of recent DNS, the best you could get is a really small fraction of a second in the first time you are opening the website in that day/hour (really don't know how long your browser keep the dns cache).

my isp's botnet will make them money that they can use to improve the infrastructure in my hood.

cloudflare's botnet will make them money so that they can become an even worse adversary of freedom.

>cloudflare's botnet will make them money so that they can become an even worse adversary of freedom.
when have they done this?

>really don't know how long your browser keep the dns cache

Should be the domain's TTL value.
Usually a day, yes.

I just tracepath them. They are not using MPLS, they are using a tier one ISP to host a closer DNS server.
Mystery solved.

every post you make gets decrypted at cloudflares servers and then sent on to NSA & Jow Forums

It's slower than 8.8.8.8 on my shithole

It's still the same as everything else. You're not going to benefit from something being 2 ms faster.

With all the new CDN tech and high availability using DNS, people are keeping their DNS TTL really short now days. Really don't know if your browser, by default, don't short it even more.

>every post you make gets decrypted at cloudflares servers and then sent on to NSA & Jow Forums
NSA has had racks in major internet highways since 9/11.

Boy, do you know what is DNS?
It just translate the names to IPs. They have nothing to do with your traffic (unless they point a fake IP address to you and build a entire website to fool you, but lets faced. you are not worth the effort).

>Boy, do you know what is DNS?
>It just translate the names to IPs. They have nothing to do with your traffic (unless they point a fake IP address to you and build a entire website to fool you, but lets faced. you are not worth the effort).
no fucking shit that's what DNS does.
i was just adding some actual info about what the NSA actually has going on.

NSA don't give a shit about you. They have better thing to do than spy on your MLP porn.

apparently they have never heard of E2EE

NSA made 9/11 bad.
this is what the terrorists would have wanted.

cloudflare is the other end...

they don't give a shit but they still are aggregating our data and flagging shit.

>aggregating our data
I recently stored my flow table (just mine, for security research) and end up with a giant blob of data. Keep in mind, it was only the connections that i had made, not the actual payload transmitted.
It's impossible to store such large quantity of information or even process it in realtime for everyone. They only do this for important people, not you (definitely not you m8).

better than google tbqh

How much did the IP cost?
Enough to warrant shilling it everywhere so they can sell personal data to get the cost back.

IANA is handling out the last bits of addresses that where not used for test reasons.
Old equipment still drop the 1.0.0.0/8 because consider it a non roteable address.
Most people still don't have network equipment that fully support the way that the ISPs want to use IPv6, and this will take time. Even more now that most small providers who did not had cash to buy more ip ranges adopted CGNAT.

>It's impossible to store such large quantity of information or even process it in realtime for everyone. They only do this for important people, not you (definitely not you m8).

That is simply not true.

They store absolute gigantic amounts of traffic.
Easily enough to store all text based communications on everybody.
Only speech, videos, images, etc. they will only store on "important" people and everybody directly communicating with them.

They've got a ton of resources and experts. It is definitely possible for them.

>cant "feel" a 10 ms difference
lol fag

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center

>Exabytes.

That's in the order of gigabytes for every single man woman and child on this earth.

There is almost 4 billion people with internet access in the world.
You would need a dedicated server for every 100 people in order to process this. That would be millions of servers...

>muhh big data
Google can't handle realtime analytics, and they have by far the biggest datacenter in the world.

>ICMP is not the most efficient, purpose-built protocol for investigating routes and timings

>Received 96 bytes from 4.2.2.2#53 in 13 ms
>Received 96 bytes from 1.1.1.1#53 in 11 ms
>Received 96 bytes from 8.8.8.8#53 in 2 ms

Guess I'll leave it as is

>The speed you care about from DNS is network latency, not response time

That's in the order of gigabytes for every single man woman and child on this earth.
Make the count.

>the response time for your DNS query is not ultimately gated by round trip delays
>how does information theory and space-time operate

>dedicated server for every 100 people

Don't be absurd.
People don't communicate that much.

Facebook has 2.2 billion monthly active users and handles it just fine.
The NSA has far more resources.

>can't handle realtime analytics

I never said "realtime"
For starters I have a MSc in AI so I would never confuse "live" for "realtime".

I only said the NSA COLLECTS all that data.

>That's in the order of gigabytes for every single man woman and child on this earth.
1 EB = 1073741824 GB
Earth = 7600000000 Pop

Sorry but i need to leave now. I only work until 6pm and it's 17:58.

>Facebook
Facebook don't process data looking for strings. They just store and post, and they have a huge number of giant datacenters around the world.

It isn't. That's a theoretical maximum speed if the DNS lookup was instantaneous.
DNS can be much slower such as an uncached lookups.

>on the order of exabytes or larger.[2]
>exabyteS
>ie: PLURAL

>or larger
>ie possibly zettabytes

>hurr durr I can't read

>They just store and post
Yes??????
And??????
so does the NSA

>huge number of giant datacenters around the world.
Nothing even close to the Utah Data Center

No data logging = better speed