It's better than vanilla GNOME (still shit though), but

why do you habe 6gb of ram

because bigfoot

oh no my rams
what will I ever do
also vanilla gnome is better, what do you need that dock for?

>my own screenshot
property doesn't exist

Attached: Nietzcshe-56a715055f9b58b7d0e6a0f1.jpg (768x932, 119K)

>no useless dock
vanilla comfy

Attached: vanilla.jpg (1369x770, 241K)

that's Nietzsche, not Stirner

those are pixels

I'm using it right now and I really hate it.
Gnome is like a tablet DE and you must use it like a bloated WM since it's a pain to use with a mouse.

Attached: shit.png (1920x1080, 289K)

just edit the css

u funni

pixels are spooks, the picture is mine

You can tell it's eeew Ubuntu by the fact that it's got a Amazon link in the left title bar and ugly red/brown color theme. The "Intel Ubuntu" icon in the upper left corner is also a dead give-away.

>mine

Attached: 1515961410684.png (691x653, 27K)

I'm criticizing its defaults. I know you can fix most things (not all) at the cost of increased ram usage.

>t. doesn't actually use gnome

>Gnome is like a tablet DE
wrong

Any arguments? I only see there a fisher price "DE" intended for use with a touchscreen.

>intended for use with a touchscreen.
it's not

>wrong
>it's not
Okay... I'm not gonna waste moar time with you.

gnome works well in virtual machines when you enable the tablet input. it's the preferred way to use spice for video output

k
but im right
and ur rong

>works well
didn't know that
last i read tablet support even in gnome was more like crappy

>>>/global/rules/2

doesn't make me not rite
post your butthurt somewhere else

Show me your 10 year old boipussy, and maybe I'll agree.

I did not know of this redirect. thank you user.

Opposite buttons are actually a good idea i think.

Attached: reported.gif (1053x435, 45K)

gnome is pretty good on the surface
problem is it works like shit

>problem is it works like shit
I've never had a problem with it
I've always had problems with KDE unless I'm using neon

>It's better than vanilla GNOME
No, vanilla Gnome with a nice material theme and icons is better than that mess. Even then Gnome is only good on x86 tablets with at least 4GB of RAM like a Surface Pro.

>That's basically Windows-tier, and windows is running all kinds of botnet in the background
Ubuntu is also botnet.

>You're about to save some document.
>You change your mind.
>Now you have to do a totally unnecessary movement the other side of the window.
They only look good. This one may be a bit but there's a lot of unnecessary movements with the mouse in this desktop.

Attached: 1524759841868.png (221x237, 108K)

>you're about to save some document
>you position your finger over the button
>accidentally press the button right next to it
>deletes your file

>finger
>desktop
pick one.

>it's ok for nautilus to use half a gigabyte for opening a folder and going back
suuuuure

Basically you're confirming what I mentioned earlier about being a tablet DE intended to use with a touchscreen.

the fundamental issue here is I have ram, you don't have ram.
it's ok-- just specify you're not in it for features which gnome has
yes, which is probably the biggest reason why buttons should be spread apart

no the fundamental issue here is there are bugs
and it's crap

with features comes bugs
I'll take the features and contribute to bug reporting. thanks for the advice

you seem confused you keep posting about features
but if gnome is known for one thing it's that it's
removing features

bugs remain tho

I've got it running on wayland. that's a neat feature.

lol a fully working Gentoo desktop (with portage tree) fits in 1GB

Ubuntu is bloat

i've got weston runing on wayland
guess what, it works better

great. I'm sure it has less plugins and features than mutter, but good on you