Jow Forums is this accurate?

Attached: tech_alignment.jpg (1399x1119, 204K)

No

>Stallman
>lawful good
>good in any way, shape or form

Aya! Rabbi Anonymous, I see you are doing very well!

Attached: 1492319666080.gif (300x289, 1.43M)

Can't I hate both jews and pedo commies in peace?

Yes.

You are missing the point, people who are LG are often conceited and take issue with problems by actively seeking out others to help and ways to help them, even where none is required. They operate only according to their sense of justice and will never back down or accept another opinion. In some ways it's just as bad as being chaotic evil as its a force that can't be reasoned with.

Reminder that if you don't know who all these people are you don't belong on Jow Forums

stallman should be chaotic good

No; he spent his life building a foundation and working with lawyer to build a legal framework for free software. He's the opposite of chaotic.

>child molester
>lawful good

>not having Terry as chaotic neutral

i don't recognize chaotic good, true neutral and chaotic neutral am I a brainlet

Stallman is definitely Paladdin-tier Lawful Good, as in a right all the time, but a goddamned pain in the ass to deal with.

>Stallman is definitely Paladdin-tier Lawful Good
No.

Who are they? And where is our dearest glorious mother Lisa?

Poettering should be Lawful Evil.
He makes full use of established organisations to push his shit and derides everything that isn't part of it.

Zuckerberg breaks the law as much as he can get away with.

Linus is chaotic good.

this

Where is Terry

Wrong jew, user.

In "chaotic shitpost"

Who are the last two?

>lawful good
>a jew
top kek

Attached: jew HD.gif (1607x2047, 87K)

>Stallman
>Lawful good
He's just as bad as Zuckerberg tbqh.

Theo de Raadt, John Carmack and Lennart Poettering
Yes you are a brainlet

Lawful good is opposite of Chaotic evil.
It makes perfect sense in that way.

Someone does not know their DnD shit.