How do you write a batch to rename a certain file extension to something else
This one no longer works
>for /R %x in (*.jpg) do ren "%x" *.png
How do you write a batch to rename a certain file extension to something else
This one no longer works
>for /R %x in (*.jpg) do ren "%x" *.png
Other urls found in this thread:
kernel.org
myredditnudes.com
twitter.com
Who is cute? Better not be the turk roach \(>_
Fug nvm it's the turk roach
Replace *.jpg with something like 'dir /B *.jpg' I think you have to also use for /F instead or /R
For more info take a look at ss64.com, I find it really helpful for reference for Windows command line idiosyncracies
find . -type f -name "*.txt" -exec bash -c 'mv "$1" "${1::-4}".new _ {} \;
use Linux dumb faggot
Demen semon
who dis qt gurl
Like this?
for /F %x in (dir /B *.jpg) do ren "%x" *.png
Yeah that should be close to working, though you may need single quotes as in ('dir /B *.jpg')
didn't work :
Jesus you're a retard, I'm not gonna write it for you. I gave you a reference. Use it, kill yourself, idc
Why are you sperging
whats wrong with her I mean other than being turk
find is ugly use a foor loop it's sexier
Just like write it in python, way more commands, extensions, the code is clearer and the skills you'll learn will be useful as fuck if you are creative enough.
if there are special characters in file names or directories you're fucked kiddo
just use Ant Renamer lol
Yes
who is this Damian Semon?
some turkroach trap
>turkroach
*instant cockblock*
I know her irl, she's not a trap.
And yes she's aware of the meme that people think she's a trap
Are you literally renaming jpg files to pngs? You do realize that doesn't convert then to png files right?
I want to fuck her
why bother with writing a batch for a 3 second job?
Install Perl
rename 's/\.jpg$/.png/' *.jpg
is she a friendly person?
>her
>perl
It's not 1996 anymore.
Is that a boy? Because I'd prefer that person to be a boy.
I don't know her that well.
That's terrible
for i in *.jpg; do mv "$i" "${i%jpg}png"; done
rename .jpg .png *
>${1/.jpg/.png}
What if there are spaces in the file name? You have to change your IFS; find is mess free. Also, his variable substitution guarantees only the file extension is changed.
>What if there are spaces in the file name?
That's why it's in quotes.
>You have to change your IFS
I don't. It already works with spaces.
>find is mess free
His find solution recurses in every subdirectory for no reason.
Hopefully no one was dumb enough to test it in their home directory.
>his variable substitution guarantees only the file extension is changed.
So does mine, it uses backward search.
But I did forget to put in the dots. So it would change a file like "foojpg" too.
But that's a trivial fix.
Why would I install perl for something I can do in a small bash function?
That is not the perl rename
AVAILABILITY
The rename command is part of the util-linux package and is available
from kernel.org
Consider using PowerShell instead of Batch. Batch is obsolete.
>That's why it's in quotes.
Shit. Wtf did I have difficulty with this before.
>But I did forget to put in the dots
Actually, you wouldn't need to add a period. % removes a non-greedy match from the end of the value.
>List-Item | Change-ItemName -Filter * -FromRegex '.*\.jpg' -Replacement '.png'
>cancer that also gives you aids
Why is PS so ugly?
you're not supposed to loop over ls or globs like that, it's bad practice.
Also, renaming a file doesn't change the file format. If you take some foo.jpg and rename it as foo.png, you'll have a .jpg file with a .png extension, which is fucking retarded.
>Actually, you wouldn't need to add a period.
?
$ foo="foojpg" echo ${foo%jpg}png
foopng
That's what the dots would avoid.
Ah wait sorry, I'm an idiot. That wont get matched by the wildcard pattern in the first place.
Everything is an object so expect PascalCase and lots of dots. It's not so bad
He might just have a ton of image files with the wrong extensions.
Buggy image crawler, screwed up batch rename, etc.
>foojpg
Lol
you're right when it comes to ls, but otherwise no.
do you even know why it is considered bad practice? or are you just parrotting something you heard from somewhere else?
the syntax itself isn't so bad, the implementation is the real problem. traditional unixy shells interface with files and pass text whereas powershell interfaces with the same buggy API's vbscript and wmic did
PowerShell interfaces with .NET. VBScript interfaced with DCOM. Different APIs.
It in fact looks extremely non-intuitive. Also non-readable although it uses some long ass operators(?). That's just one thing you'd expect.
absolutely nothing
kek
anzu is cute when she's not intentionally trying to be ugly
i would nut INSIDE her vagina