Just compare it vs DOS:
>Designed for personal computers
>Simple, easy directory tree
>Handul of configuration files (autoexec.bat, himem.sys, config.sys)
>No complicated user configurations and permissions
>Literally one directory (DOS)
>Add windows: literally 2 directories, Dos, and Windows
>Run Windows by calling win.com from autoexec.bat
>Using only dos, just load the mouse driver and mscdex and sound drivers and you're fine
>Everyone in DOS world was happy with EDIT.EXE, no arguments
>God said let there be 256 colors
>You are the only user and you can run any command you want
>Modern windows continues the simple directory tree and uses the same DOS interface for command line
Now look at GNU/Linux:
>carbon copy of UNIX, which is designed for complicated server systems with large user bases
>Users trying in veign to turn complicated server OS into a personal computing OS
>Confusing and large directory tree
>Configuration files not localised to any particular area
>Toolset depends on easy to forget command names
>Unhealthy fear of GUIs
>Giant nerd wars over VIM vs EMACS
>Loading correct drivers usually involves searching google for info on your windows machine
>450 different ways to break your install
>a simple change in your bios (like reset defaults) could literally make the system unbootable
>designed by obtuse autists
>desktop environments less stable than windows
>muh freedom
>"YOU CANNOT RUN THIS COMMAND AS ROOT"
>"YOU MUST BE ROOT TO RUN TIHS COMMAND"
>Need sudo to install a printer
>Everything locked down, treats you like you are in a prison
And that is why Linux will never be a popular desktop OS