Who was in the wrong here?

he said something like "it's free so it's ok btw god isn't real"

I don't usually agree with everything stallman says but this time he is clearly in the right

>GNU

Attached: 1524380220479s.jpg (250x201, 9K)

>it's still there
gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Aborting-a-Program.html

Cant stall the Stallman

did you just made that up?

It sounds incredibly much like something hed say

I love fucking Stallman.

Sounds quite plausible desu.

>joke that is pro-abortion
>gotta remove it because maybe someone had a bad experience with abortion

Attached: nat ahaha.png (503x545, 251K)

>tfw Stallman will never give you a GNU/Abortion.

Attached: ok_retard.jpg (782x960, 46K)

the current state of snowflakes in 2018

I don't care if it's plausible, I just wonder if he has said anything for real.

How disconnected from reality can a man be?

>He suggested the possibility of adding a trigger warning about functions that create child processes, since childbirth is "far more traumatic than having an abortion".
I fucking love Stallman.

Attached: 1337229867234.jpg (450x355, 17K)

Snowflakes absolutely destroyed. Fucking lold.

Attached: IMG_20170911_212927.png (459x612, 424K)

What's the joke?

SJW glibc tantrum fork when?

>Carlos O'Donell suggested that the joke could hurt people who have had bad experiences associated with abortion.
Well, kinda obvious that his mom had a bad experience with abortion.

holy shit what a literal god

LUL

Jesus fucking christ, that scathing remark.

Can't stop him fighting for freedom.

Attached: 1520531327296.png (1366x768, 1.19M)

...it's not even something offensive, just a joke on the govt's censorship. Censoring that would be retarded.

RMS is truly a powerful being.

Attached: STALLMAN_WAITING_IN_THE_SKY.jpg (1280x720, 64K)

Carlos for sure. Jokes in manuals are the only thing that keeps me alive.

Attached: humping wizards.gif (128x64, 4K)

It's been almost 30 years, sensitive faggots never change.

BASED STALLMAN

Cheeky cunt

im sick of today's attitude of NO FUN in case it hurts some mentally retarded tranny's feelings

I love Stallman fucking.

It's a leftist joke about pro-lifers in government, too

manuals are for professional work only, no fun allowed.

Another autistic tantrum, our boy is unstoppable.

I fucking love Stallman.

>Who was in the wrong here?
Any time men discuss the reproductive functions of women they do so without any first-hand experience.
Who listens when women babble on about cocks and balls? Nobody, except other women.
If women want to put jokes about abortion, menstruation or childbirth into software docs that's their business.

>you need to personally experience something to make a joke about it
Great sense of humor you have there bud.

>Who listens when women babble on anything? Nobody, except other women.
fixed

Attached: 967b069838e07c28e193af798544b15c.png (420x420, 309K)

gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Aborting-a-Program.html
>Futture Change Warning: Proposed Federal censorship regulations may prohibit us from giving you information about the possibility of calling this function. We would be required to say that this is not an acceptable way of terminating a program.
Not the epitome of clever jokes, but as offensive as Carlos puts it? Hell no. It's just some oaf with far too much spare time to actually make this an issue at all. The damn thing sits at the bottom of the article, encased in a box, with a text in bold indicating something can (but won't) happen in the future. If you have at least two neurons, you can understand this is useless and move on. Carlos can't.

Stallman is our Jew. Fuck everyone else.

To further this point, this is one of the few, if not the only page, that has information inside a box, which should be even easier to ignore if that sort of content is what resides in them.