When did you realise that Outlook was, and is, the superior email service?

When did you realise that Outlook was, and is, the superior email service?

Attached: lookout.png (340x340, 7K)

Since 2000 when i created @msn.com account that i use until now, pajeet.

>having to pay for encryption
wew, so much for respecting privacy

I was highlighting the "Easily add...memes" bit actually.

...

>prevent others from forwarding them
Embrace, extend, ...

>having to pay for encryption which actually is faster and gzipped better

wew lad it's like they want to fuck themselves

>encryption which actually is faster and gzipped better
what? how is encrypted data (i.e. supposedly random) better compressed then their plaintext counter part?

google it, idiot
common knowledge.

>When did you realise that Outlook was, and is, the superior email service?

Just after I transitioned and started calling myself Shirley

>hsts allows a billion pipes instead of just 1 to transfer data

microsoft's own "compressible encryption"

Attached: 5.png (294x353, 3K)

Can you link a source or something? Because the only result I can find supporting your claim is talking about the novelty of it (i.e. "hey i just look like a compressed file, nothing suspicious about me" vs. "i'm a metric fuckton of randomness")
The whole point of crypto is that it's supposed to look /completely random/. Which is counter productive for compression. At best, you end up with a file that's the same size. If you actually end up with a smaller file then something's fucked with your crypto.

What the fuck does HSTS have to do with compressing encrypted data?

There's definitely a reason why they've distinguished between "high encryption" and "compressible encryption". It's certainly not AES.

12 rupees have been deposited to your online microsoft evangelism campaign fund,

Attached: qCsujgp.png (391x752, 80K)

>now you can have placebo "encryption" and restrict how others use their email
>but only if you give us shekels
Oy vey

google
they literally have articles about SPDY etc

(((Email as a service)))

But their rendering engine is the worst of all the email clients desu. We've been spending countless hours at work trying to get fucking background images to work in Outlook 2016 and before

Attached: ru1abmoj2ou01.jpg (750x615, 53K)

CONBERSATIONSSS!!!

>prevent others from forwarding
How?
Can't I just attach the letter and send it?

Outlook as a service is alright but i'll never touch outlook the client again without being paid. Fucking piece of shit software.