>Now that the desktop is long gone, launching binaries and desktop files from within Nautilus is not as useful. Not only that, but we are moving towards a more sandboxed system, and we should use the standard and system wide support for launching apps based on users choices.
>We also are not able to be secure enough to handle this, as we saw in the past we allowed untrusted binaries to be launched, and therefore we had a CVE (CVE-2017-14604) for Nautilus. We are not being audited (afaik) and we are not in a position that we can let this issues slip.
>With that altogether, this prevents launching binaries or programs from Nautilus.
It's actually possible. Built some of it functionality into activities and say that user don't need more anyway.
Grayson James
>Why navigate to your photos when Shotwell is perfectly fine, just import them >Your music is available in lollypop, no need to view them on disk >Your browser has a downloads manager, just open your latest files from there lol >We have an AppStore™, no need to compile source or install binaries
The apotheosis of GNOME will be a shiny, polished ui, but you will only have the option to open your browser (opendesktop.org set as home) and image/music/video icons on full screen. Adding more icons will of course require plugins. Just like the iPhone screen, you won't be able to remove them.
Enjoy the foot.
Ayden Rogers
why are people even using gnome? it lacks very basic features >desktop icons this is a must for any productive user >window list what programs am I running? how do I switch between them fast? >landing screen (desktop) is empty, only a wallpaper. To do anything you need to click on the top left corner are gnome devs retarded?
