>"Don't mind me, I use an adblocker"
"Don't mind me, I use an adblocker"
Other urls found in this thread:
arstechnica.com
github.com
en.wikipedia.org
gnu.org
jspenguin2017.github.io
twitter.com
I decide what runs on my hardware
Blow it out your ass
>"I don't use an adblocker please rape my ass!"
Isn't it sad when the main reason I use an adblocker is to stop malware?
Then why do you block the safe ads that meet the safe ad spec as defined by Google?
>as defined by Google
Hmm, I wonder.
All advertisement is malicious.
Like the time Salon magazine deployed a cryptominer? Or what, are they not large enough to be a trusted site? Even when they show up in both Google news searches and Firefox's suggested stories page?
If the ad isn't a png or jpeg file loaded from an internal source it's botnet by default. I exclude gifs because those were the cancer of webs past.
>main reason
>implying more than 1 reason