C or C++ for CE

This may be a stupid question, but is it more preferable to learn C or C++ for Computer Engineering? Or will both do?

Attached: D65689CC-ECAD-40F5-BFA4-8B58116A415D.jpg (318x399, 43K)

Other urls found in this thread:

Jow
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

What the fuck are you going to do with C?

Attached: 2443.png (340x338, 152K)

First C then C++

You should be using Go

Use it for embedded systems I assume

Fuck off faggot

C++, then pick up the difference in C when needed.
Jow Forums-science.wikia.com/wiki/Computer_Science_and_Engineering

If I was a faggot I would say to use Rust

Just use Rust.
It's superior in every way.

You got me there

Attached: E0A693BE-EE93-4D3F-B13B-675021E09DD1.jpg (640x480, 108K)

Assembly Language -> C -> C++

both

> CE

Kys faggot

C

t. webdev monkey

How’s that 30k/year pajeet?

Attached: E90AC5B8-69AD-49F4-8610-BB6461A86414.jpg (645x729, 32K)

You have to explain what you mean by CE. That's too broad of a domain.

Hardware engineering

You mean embedded systems? What kind?

If that's the case, start with C. For microcontrollers, I recommend the AVRs, they're very easy to learn with.

C+, meet in the middle.

Learn C# since it's the newest version of the C language

Learn C. C is C++ with all the bad/bloated shit removed.

Fuck off faggot

If I've finished C, do you think I can do matlab?

Fuck off faggot

Skip C, learn C++ then whittle away what you can and write mostly-C style in C++.

>he doesn't program in binary

>c++
found the nigger

Kek. Nigger you probably never even saw 30k in your life.

Go jerk it off to animu faggot

It fixes up whole classes of bugs and provides no cost standard libraries that just work better. On top of that you can choose to not use them whenever you're less noob.

C++ doesn't have to devolve into a complete clusterfuck (any more than C)

Both, C++ offers OOP

C has OOP too. C++ offers better non-oop.

What can you do in niggerlicious++ that I can't do in x86 assembly you fucking cock eating porch monkey faggot.

>he's incapable of learning both

have a decent string library

>C has OOP too
not really. you can fake it at the expense of readability and type safety if you're really wanting to but it's more object-like than object-oriented.

>C++ offers better non-oop.
C++ is designed for OOP silly

C++ is designed for lots of things, doesn't mean it is in anyone's best interest to use them (often).

Write C in C++ with (some) C++ libraries. Exceptions exist when you need them. Best possible solution.

Fuck off faggot

c for dummies is better than c++ for dummies.
that being said, if you learn either one, you won't have trouble picking up the other within hours or minutes.

If you finished c I'll let you do me