GDPR is commie heavy-handed nanny state intromission that will stifle the Internet and erode free speech, competition...

This fucking board is parroting botnet this botnet that, but when the law against such practice comes you decide its best to back to sucking corporate cock. Fuck off already

I'm pretty sure it's just paid shills.

Accept it,or get used to lawsuits and fines being Europe's gross national product.

Relax fool.Not all of us have lost our minds.

You failed, Pajeet. How long until Comcast has you deported?
fortune.com/2018/05/23/netflix-worth-more-comcast-record-stock/

Dont need no government to """"solve"""" our problems

Attached: 1526658472791_0.jpg (394x350, 44K)

The truth is that you don't want the problem to be solved.
You want to stay in this state of permament struggle against the evil botnet so you neckbeards can play the part of the hero.

>abusing private information will stifle the internet
fuck off back to india, pai

The government isn't the way to solve these problems you fucking statist.

>lolbertarian

Attached: lmao.gif (500x357, 353K)

All the botnet-centric and ad-centric web does is encourage a race to the bottom, and the only "innovation" will be based on how to better harvest personal data.

So what is?

>he is not sucking corporate cock therefore he must be defending the government
Tell me how you would solve it then, sport.

Attached: 1351961802031.png (300x300, 13K)

Ever since the GDPR shit started I started getting email from a bunch of businesses asking for my permission to use data. It's great.

It really brings to light how many of these assholes were storing my data just because they could. And not talking about web pages only. Things like local auto repair shop stored my email and phone number just so they can spam me with their shit.

If you want to live in a nannystate move to yurop.

>implying gdpr solved anything
We could just do nothing and get the same effect

lolbertarians are truly worthy of their name
as soon as you criticize corporations they assume you blindly defend anything the gubmint does

>Government cuckolds

Attached: eba.jpg (579x567, 56K)

Wow that sure answered my question.

You are defending goverment regulations right now

Can you, as a non-european bumfuckistani, ask Facebook/Microsoft/Google to delete all the data they have of you?

Boycotts and general public education so as to change companies.
Also more competition

>jew mad that his data harvesting data """""""business"""""""" is over

What do you mean "do nothing"?

How will allowing corporations (hundreds per site according to some permission lists) to harvest and sell data without telling anyone (the present situation, i.e. doing nothing) be the same as forcing them to ask permission?

Surely this is the more Libertarian way? Giving people an option to be part of the botnet or not? Is this not just properly informing the "customer" of the terms of the relationship?

Yes, and that's because I read it and it's a good law, not because I blindly swallow everything governments do
I get that you're probably under 12, but please bear in mind that it's possible to agree with someone, be it a person or an entity, on some things and disagree on others.

>Boycotts and general public education so as to change companies.
HAHAHA! Good fucking luck with that one, champ.

>Cuckold mad that his dear ruler is being challenged

Attached: qr9PpkNf7DsW1fO5ORqN0n3LlfDEepRdY5V3Gu2ehaw.png (498x710, 290K)

lol

>more competition will save our data

Attached: f012dca58b4f00e1ae43af8888051bea.png (280x210, 96K)

american companies are just going to drop support for yurop since you decided to make their business model illegal and now your cost more than you are worth. Progress

I'm European and I actually agree with this. Many people want to ban Europe from accessing their site because they would rather not bother since it's a side project anyway. Big corporations will have no problem adapting, but small projects are something else. So this shit is actually an advantage for tech Giants since it's harder for small startups to comply than it is for them.

Being challenged? By whom?
If anything, it's the botnet that is finally being challenged right now.

This guy's name is pajeet in pig latin.

Even better, we don't need burger botnet.

>Company provides service
>Company provides exact same service but without the extra added botnet
Who wins?

Next stop is the food coupons line for you, mutt.
Provided by your gubment lol.

>small startups find it hard to just not be botnet

Interesting.

Good. Say bye to Jow Forums too since that wont be complient

The one with pretty graphics in their website and better marketing.
99% of the population isn't even aware of the botnet. Get outside.

>creating laws will restrain organic growth and stiffle competition
NO SHIT ?!

Finally.

>competition
>innovation
Probably a little.

>user choice
If you consider fucking yourself over for no benefit to be a valid user choice, then sure.

>free speech
How? No, really have you read it? How?

Truely will be a great day when yuropoors are restricted from posting because of their rediculous regulations. Also have you gotten your porn license yet? Enjoy it before you get restricted from pornhub

>How? No, really have you read it? How?
lmao he thinks burgers can read

>watching porn at all
I'm not from the United Cuckdom anyway.
Do they not teach that "Europe" is not a country in Burgerland?

Like my local sports club? yeah they are also included in this. Or you know my dads one person company cause he has some information of his customers (literally only email, name and phone number). Luckily the dutch government wont go after the little guys for a while (seeing as even our tax agency can't meet these demands on time)

>also have you gotten your porn license yet?
>one country so different from the EU that it felt the need to leave it = the EU
Oh dear.

Does 4chins store my private information?

How the fuck do you not know at this point?
youtu.be/6KFz9WRRNpk

Must be german because he doesn't know what a joke is

Duh your posts and ip, which points to your house.

If that's all he has all he needs to do is delete, provide or update it upon request and tell them if it gets stolen. What onerous compliances tasks do you picture him undertaking?

>Drop one of the largest, if not the largest markets in the world
Sounds like a great idea! Stakeholders will love it!

compliance*

>Have you tried not being a botnet?

Attached: 1veblj.jpg (800x334, 34K)

there's no 'provisions' for oganisation size because otherwise you end up in situations where startups can abuse the ever loving shit out of their lack of necessary gdpr compliance to not only steal marketshare from established law abiding businesses but also to out-compete with other startups that are doing the exact same thing
in fact, such a heavy approach to regulations is the exact type of 'government meddling' that you seem opposed against, as it's meddling that directly favours certain businesses over others, giving them a direct governmental and legal edge over their competitors
ps, to suggest that smaller businesses are going to be hit with an undue burden is just plain wrong, the ICO in the UK has stated that fines will be proportional not only to business size but to how severe data breaches are as well as how unwilling companies are to comply, the ICO is only interested in compliance, the fines are there as a stick to beat people into compliance while the carrot is that compliance means cooperating with the commissioners to rectify things like data breaches

tl;dr don't leak sensitive plaintext information and don't get hit with severe fines

Almost as much as supporting a market that isn't profitable! Nah you"ll end up paying either way, probably through taxes in true european style

Reminder that GDPR is unenforceable

I dare you to test that theory.

Eu cant even make the zuck come and speak to them. Then they do this because hurt fee fees

Sounds like fun. Give me a website idea.

Collect people's data and sell it to advertising for money, regardless of whether they want you to or not.

This.

Dutch government already openly admitted they have no capacity to enforce.

>just boycott facebook guys, it's easy!
>all you have to do is download these 500 adblock lists while whitelisting javascript on every site because every site has facebook tracking scripts, never associate or email people that use facebook because they can submit their emails to facebook for 'ease of use' and you should refuse to allow people to take your photo in case they upload it to facebook while acknowledging that people can take your photo and distribute it without your permission

theverge.com/2018/5/23/17387146/instapaper-gdpr-europe-access-shut-down-privacy-changes

Hahahah the internet is shitting down in europe good job idiots

Data mining isn't the only source of profit for websites.

Just dont use first world data centers :^)

I wish Russian trolls would get off Jow Forums. Or maybe I should just get off Jow Forums instead of being annoyed at how Jow Forums became even more shit.

The government exists to protect freedoms and rights, you dingus.You've become so used to them selling you out,you don't even know what think anymore,do you?

>don't leak sensitive plaintext information and don't get hit with severe fines
There's more to compliance than that, you dense motherfucker.

You can get blasted for not collecting any data at all (outside of cookie info to make the site fucking work), and not being transparent about it. They *will* use this as a sledgehammer to silence content they find objectionable affecting only organizations so small that total compliance places a burden on them.

Not only that, but it's pointless. Reminder that Facebook posted an all-time record breaking quarter AFTER the CA scandal broke.

it's only unenforceable if you never want to do business with eu companies or customers

rupert murdoch complied with a formal uk summons, zuckerberg will too if he ever wants to set foot in the uk again

>They *will* use this as a sledgehammer to silence content they find objectionable affecting only organizations so small that total compliance places a burden on them.
>Not collecting personal data is a burden.

Rupert murdoch is nothing compared to the zuck

>implying corporations aren't states
lemme guess, you think ancap is anarchist too :^)

sure thing buddy

But he's right though.
Rupes Murdizzle net worth: about $17B
Chucklefuckerburg's net worth: about $73B

Retard, not collecting personal data isn't a burden.

Navigating the legal aspect of compliance is. You freetards seem to be suffering from the delusion that the only people with anything to lose are the people who want to hide things.

Your Microsofts and your Googles have unlimited resources and entire milti-million dollar legal divisions to make sure their transparency complies.

It's not as easy as just not collecting data. Color me unsuprised some Jow Forums neet freetard can't grasp the distinction.

Then you simply don't do business with Europe. The market will adapt as necessary,right?

Or you look at how much European business you do and decide whether or not it's worthwhile to shift some of your staff to create a division to specifically handle only European business and have it be compliant from the start. It'll be a minor annoyance to European returning customers because their personal info won't still be stored on your site but it's better to have a mildly miffed customer than no customer at all if you do a high enough volume of business with Europe that it would be a financial hardships to stop showing European customers.

>t pajeet webdev

It's in the ToS, if you don't agree, then just keep out. No one's forcing you to use those sites. You are not entitled to anybody else's content. Learn some economics, you bullshit ass nigger.

How about you stop spying me, zuckerstein.

>tos supercedes law
the absolute state of mutt law and education

Sorry user, in the first world ToS made by companies dont secede the law of the land, they cant force you not to kneel either

>You freetards seem to be suffering from the delusion that the only people with anything to lose are the people who want to hide things.
You truly have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

>will stifle
>Prove me wrong.

The internet and free speech are already dead. GDPR has little to do with it.

Every corporation/government wants to apply their own set of rules globally to something that is inherently owned by no one and has no borders. Meanwhile goolag, facebook, twitter, and all the other normie sites are so ubiquitous all but the most autistic among us are constantly tracked and cataloged. And freedom of speech is already dead on those platforms because their respective owners have decided that they want to be responsible for everything posted there, and as a society we've decided that it's not enough just not to see things you don't like, they have to not exist at all. The powers that be have already determined that this is an excellent way to control the narrative and push their respective agendas.

Your ISP can freely track and sell information about you with no opt in/out even available. VPNs only work insofar as they are allowed to, with VPN blocks becoming more common. More and more services require a phone number and/or a real name. Being anonymous online will soon be a thing of the past.

As the number of cable subscribers dwindles, the price of the same shitty internet service you've been getting for years increases to compensate. Regional monopolies, lobbying, and local municipal laws prevent any kind of competition normally available in a free market. And instead of paying $50/mo for cable, you pay $14/mo for 10 different services because each network wants their own service instead of playing nice with an existing one.

Your data exists in multiple places, none of which have any semblance of security. And when a breach occurs (like Equifax) no one even bats an eye. Simultaneously the three letter agencies of the world push to weaken security even more by trying to add backdoors to encryption using fear and terrorism as a scapegoat for the erosion of your rights.

It's already happened user. We're already there.

I know that you and everyone you know will still click to accept without reading the terms or disclosure agreements, making the whole thing pointless anyway...

How does big daddy government's cum taste, cuckboi?

>instead of paying $50/mo for cable, you pay $14/mo for 10 different services
Im having 100mbs for free, 10 bucks more for every extra 100mbs

What are you even going on about?

Attached: 1521472328037.png (595x547, 289K)

Commies just fuck off already!

Attached: PSX_20180524_190841.jpg (400x286, 47K)

I'm talking about services like Netflix, CBS All Access, HBO Now, Hulu, Prime Video, whatever bullshit Disney comes up with, etc, not the internet service.

Also idk how you get 100mbps for free but that is definitely not typical, at least not here in burger land.