Sup Jow Forumsoys I'm prob gonna start using tails now and then for innocent Mormon clearnet purposes :^) is it a gay meme or is it a decent level of protection from unwarranted vigilance
Sup Jow Forumsoys I'm prob gonna start using tails now and then for innocent Mormon clearnet purposes :^) is it a gay...
James Cook
Other urls found in this thread:
marc.info
twitter.com
Daniel Lee
Its good for privacy purposes. I wouldnt count on it for too much than that but its pretty much the only option out there
Landon Collins
Tails is useless. Either go with kali or heads because it's without system d
Xavier Peterson
imagine the irony of using that and not being a pedo :^)
James Nelson
What is mormon clearnet?
Grayson Brown
Remove the HDD and only live boot
Even then the BIOS and USB can be hacked
Jonathan Martin
I'm actually not doing any nearly as bad as
Implied
Literally just making some sketchy clearnet orders and am paranoid
Does systemd really compromise security this much?
Tyler Parker
Me thinking I have a sense of humor
>Mormon
Generic dumb innocent monotheist
>Clearnet
Regular internet, not darknet
Chase Morales
Probably some private community for pedos.
Mormonism is basically a cult for pedophiles.
Joseph Cox
Well...
I mean he already uses Jow Forums
Jonathan Morgan
William Murphy
I actually did not know this I'm sorry for making that shit joke in the first place
Isaiah Bennett
> Is it a decent level of protection from unwarranted vigilance
No. There is no protection from unwanted vigilance. If an adversary is vigilant enough, you will be compromised. Full stop.
But if you just want to browse around anonymously from home; sure. Will work fine... But any other use case can vary.
Julian Edwards
>If an adversary is vigilant enough, you will be compromised. Full stop.
No. Definitely not 'Full stop'. I don't even know how you came to that conclusion. Fear mongering piece of shit.
Bentley Bennett
To imply that you can't be compromised is to imply that there is a perfectly secure system.
Which is false.
As stated, there is no protection from unwanted vigilance. If an adversary is vigilant enough, you will be compromised. Full stop.
Sebastian Nelson
Pls don't aware the plebs.
Blake Parker
> is to imply that there is a perfectly secure system.
Just because it's possible doesn't mean it's feasible. It's possible for them to break all encryption on the planet if they spent a billion years brute forcing your encryption. Saying "You will be compromised full stop" because of that possibility is fucking retarded.
Stop posting.
You're a moron.
Lucas Carter
HURR IF DEY TRY RLY HARD N SHUT DOWN THE ENTIRE PLANET THEY COULD GET U, 'FULL STOP'.
NOTHING IS SAFE!!
Cameron Morris
Heads is fucked due to Dyne caring more about systemd than patching CVEs timely
Kali isn't amnesiac and configured as private as TAILS ootb
Camden Reed
What's this all about now? Can I get a quick rundown?
Anthony Cook
Use another example. Solid encryption is usually compromised by implementation. If op is looking to escape being targeted, which was the first line of his post, Tails isn't a solution.
There is no protection from unwanted vigilance. If an adversary is vigilant enough, you will be compromised. Full stop.
You know how Tor users get v&ed? By monitoring patterns of Tor use to prove that an individual is using Tor at the time LE targets him (because new users usually don't allow themselves to be an exit node which would mask their activity better).
Aside from that, there are countless reasons to be targeted, and countless ways to be compromised. But by all means- continue to call me names instead of making any valid points whatsoever. Shows your knowledge in all of this.
Michael Wright
It's like 10 lines long, dude...
Gavin Robinson
So if you put any character that isn't a number in the username it gets root permissions? For systemd in BSD?
Christopher Ramirez
OH NO NO!
Julian Gomez
>You know how Tor users get v&ed?
Also by side channel attacks and if really lucky being the entry and exit node.