Micron first QLC SSD

archive.is/TNYI0

So, when we will see the consumer versions?
Will it have the same problems than early 3D TLC where they needed a DRAM cache?

Attached: 5210_SATA_ION_2.5_isometric_right_transparent_labled_1000x567_678x452.png (678x384, 232K)

They will make DRAMless QLC SSDs and it will print money for them. You can bet your five dicks on it.

Soon 128-256GB QLC SSDs will be in every OEM laptop/desktop instead 500-1TB HDDs.

Except ultra low end, which will be occupied by an SD card for a long time.

Does it still break after a few terabytes or whites?

eMMC wont be replaced in a long time.

Its rated to have 1/3rd of TLC total writes.

They already make DRAM-less SSDS. The 1100. Only 400TBW on a 2TB drive. So it can only rewrite itself 200 times over.

So more cheap ass chink shit that'll bring down the name, whereas samshit keeps producing expensive but just werks SSDs

Well cheaper flash storage will always be welcomed as long TLC prices keep decreasing too.

WHY THE FUCK ARE SSDS STILL SO EXPENSIVE?

Muh profits that is why, also there aren't many ssd makers.

>still no $100 1TB SSDs
oh come on!

>QLC NAND flash memory stores four bits of data per memory cell, providing a 33% capacity boost over three bit per cell TLC NAND
>The downsides are that QLC NAND has lower write endurance on the order of 1000 program/erase cycles, and lower write performance.
>the 5210 ION won't be matching 7200RPM hard drives for price per GB, but 10k RPM drives will probably be feeling the pressure
Serious question, why would you want this garbage for home use?

This. It would die within a year. The ONLY situation where this would be bought is if it were 5 times cheaper than TLC SSD.

>won't be matching 7200rpm pricing
In trash it goes.

found anas

Attached: anass.jpg (998x277, 47K)

shit what the fuck holy shit how

delet this now, I implore you to delete this

>Serious question, why would you want this garbage for home use?

- Can't afford a decent SSD.
- Still faster than a hard drive.
- Uses less power than a harddrive.
- Normies don't write terabytes of Chinese cartoon porn.
- Muh thin.

It's not a client drive, you don't "want" it for home use.

exposed

fucking Jow Forums dude

It would still last at least 4 years for average home use. Which is enough for most people especially if it comes at a price 2x lower than TLC.

$MU TO THE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON

I will definitely be sticking with my MLC SSDs for now and waiting for optane SSDs to get cheaper.

>Its rated to have 1/3rd of TLC total writes.
Which is 1/3 of MLC, which is 1/3 of SLC.

Fuck this gay Earth

Attached: 1525748337133.jpg (480x242, 12K)

i dont really care about the speed. i want >1tb drives under $1000

They should make hybrid drives with SLC for data that changes often and QLC for data that is mostly static.

Qlc is less reliable over time. Remember samsung tlc trash that was losing data in certain temperature?

Still overkill endurance for most client applications.
Even in DC drives rarely due to NAND wearing out.

>Which is 1/3 of MLC, which is 1/3 of SLC.
MLC has gotten so good that most companies have stopped production of SLC

I won't bother buying cheap 256gb until ssd prices fall below 100usd a tb