I tried installing puppy linux and it actually ran slower on my Intel atom 2gb ram netbook than Windows 7 did. Seamonkey loaded way slower on puppy than it did on 7. What the fuck is going on? I'm a bit of a noob for linux so don't bully me too hard about this stuff.
Performance issues with linux?
Ethan Brown
Other urls found in this thread:
wiki.archlinux.org
twitter.com
Caleb Gomez
Show me your credentials and send over the benchmarks faggot
Grayson Thompson
glibc
Evan Wilson
x230, dual booted xubuntu and win10, ssd and 8gb ram, i5. Win is way faster booting, shutting down, sleeping and waking and basically doing anything than xubuntu. Linux is just clunky.
Cooper Hughes
Linux is a kernel.
Jace Russell
Nobody gives a fuck, Richard.
Aiden Miller
post proofs
Carter Campbell
>puppy Linux
James Thompson
>xubuntu
Liam Russell
Try Arch or something Arch based with a performance minded kernel. I know Manjaro's kernels have performance tweak in them, though I'm not too sure about Arch itself. I have bare Arch on an old Pentium 4 and Manjaro on my newer PCs so it's like comparing apples and oranges there in terms of performance. But I've ran Xubuntu on my newer PCs and they're certainly faster with Manjaro than they were before.
As for Windows, that's never been fast to start for me at all, and switching everything over to Linux has certainly been an upgrade. I don't have shit PCs either, aside from the Pentium 4 that I only use as a sandbox from time to time. Windows just isn't very efficient.
Liam Russell
I dare to suppose that Ubuntu binaries are built for generic x86(-64) machine and Intel atom based machine is some weird low-power shit that MAY probably require some kernel-level configuration.
But most probably it's bullshit and the problem is that your hands are growing out of the wrong place.
Jayden Ramirez
misclick but it applies to puppy linux too
Gabriel Scott
Cameron Long
If that's on an x230 there's something very wrong. The other picture was on an x220.
David Sullivan
Huh, its indeed an x230. What is my next step in finding out culprits?
Adam James
I wouldn't know.
Wyatt Gutierrez
Compile from source and march native with O2
Ryan Richardson
Oliver King
NetworkManager-wait-online.service
seems to take the blame
Brandon Perry
check out dmesg,see if there's any errors related to your network device.
Josiah Russell
no network problems, but this came out:
"
[ 37.880126] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
[ 37.880138] ata1.00: failed command: SMART
[ 37.880150] ata1.00: cmd b0/d5:01:06:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 11 pio 512 in
res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
[ 37.880155] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
[ 37.880162] ata1: hard resetting link
[ 38.195652] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
[ 43.228141] ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec)
[ 43.230276] ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)
[ 43.230279] ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
[ 43.230290] ata1: hard resetting link
[ 43.547510] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
WTF, user?
Angel Collins
is your HDD dying?
Robert Phillips
Xavier renegade operating system
Justin Reed
Nope, and no tools detect any errors or problems. Botnet 10 loads way faster without any hiccups, thinking about giving up on linux, as it has been one problem after another.
Brody Taylor
lubuntu