Most people's definition of freedom:

Most people's definition of freedom:
>if I can drive my car wherever I want, then I'm free
This autist's definition of freedom:
>iF yOu CaN't DiSaSsEmBlE yOuR cAr'S eNgInE, lOoK iNsIdE aNd MoDiFy It, ThEn YoU'rE nOt TrUlY fReE
Who listens unironically to this clown again?

Attached: retard.jpg (321x445, 31K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/026p6fWSw7M?t=108
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>iF yOu CaN't DiSaSsEmBlE yOuR cAr'S eNgInE, lOoK iNsIdE aNd MoDiFy It, ThEn YoU'rE nOt TrUlY fReE

but you can do that

summer Jow Forums is so disgusting

THIS>>>>

Not in any modern car.

Maybe you cun't.

I invite you to go ahead and try and tell me what your car's computer does after you've meddled inside the engine.

why shouldn't you be able to modify something you own? that IS freedom retard

Because that's a bad idea and you'll end up with an undrivable car. And that's the end result with open sores: users end up with useless software because there's a lot of non-engineers touching the engine with their smelly Doritos fingers. Enjoy recompiling your kernel and fixing your xorg.conf twice a day, you fucking downie.

You can't do it with Linux either because systemd

>Can't take it anywhere to get it repaired besides the original manufacturer who price gouges you and still has worse service than an independent repair shop
This is unironically a huge problem with a lot of modern cars and it is a classic example of the typical anti-competitive business practices that erode markets and freedom

If I can't it's because the computer runs proprietary software.