>stallman.org
And Jow Forums praises this guy.
I'm disgusted
And Jow Forums praises this guy
Jackson Walker
Lucas Bailey
Yes, we are hippies. Where do you think you are?
Isaac Foster
Yay, another edgy shitposter who thinks he's on Jow Forums...
Julian Lewis
>Always say "she". This rejects the traditional sexism by reversing it. The book Ancillary Justice did this, and was acclaimed, but this practice is just as inaccurate as always saying "he".
>but this practice is just as inaccurate as always saying "he".
YET THE FUCKING GNU/FSF SITES DO THIS
READ A MANUAL, FUCKING SHE ANYWHERE
ANNOYING AS FUCKING BUT LMAO WHO CARES IF ITS GUYS WHO ARE ANNOYED ASDASDFSDFASFDSF
Brandon Collins
Nothing wrong with using "they" when referring to an unknown person. Once the person is known, however, it's a matter of he or she.
Parker Brown
Disgusting.
William Morales
Did your brain stopped functioning right after the title? He will not call you "they" "xhe" or whatever out of autism.
Jason Perez
what the fuck are you talking about
Thomas Parker
>The proponents of "they" argue that it is the correct choice because people have long used it occasionally in the singular. While it is true that people did so, that shows only that they faced a similar choice between bad options. Some chose "they" as the least bad, but that doesn't make it a good solution.
It doesn't matter if it's bad. Languages evolve naturally, and a lot of people use "they" as a neutral pronoun. If anyone wants to force a gender neutral alternative, they are wasting their time. :^)
Eli Smith
>As for "they", if you are plural by nature — for instance, if you are a colonial organism or a group mind, or if you wish to be known for having multiple personalities — I will use that plural pronoun to refer to you.
Humans are made up of trillions of cells so we ARE plural by nature