FUCK

FUCK
WHAT DO Jow Forums?

Attached: 2018-05-29-1527643298_812x636.png (812x636, 44K)

Yes

but non-free software is harmful and doesn't respect my freedoms.

Oh the hard questions in life

Attached: RouterOuterSpace.jpg (1920x1065, 419K)

automatically choosing no isn't a hard choice user

install gentoo

I always say no, for OP its not so simple. he needs to lurk more

choosing no will most likely mean that a lot of shit wont work out of the box without tweaking. the price of freedumb

It depends, do you want your hardware to work?

Only a Sith deals in absolutes. The path to nirvana lies within a balance of dark and light.

I'd rather live a hard life of freedom than a cushy life as a slave

The only non-free package I have on my laptop is the Wifi firmware because I don't feel like bringing an Ethernet cable to do schoolwork on campus. Hit yes, then look through your packages to see what hardware depends on the blobs, and excise the ones you feel like you can live without.

Attached: Maki.png (2000x2000, 575K)

wtf is this a new option

reminder that the fsf is dogmatic enough that this is enough cause for them to list debian as not-recommended software even though they're the strictest about the gnu/ part, respecting freedoms and separating nonfree software of any major distro

Attached: gnuslashcultleader.jpg (3504x2336, 2.7M)

While I agree with you, you need an autistic pillar to align yourself too.
If stallman wasn't so steadfast the definition of free software would get diluted

They have to do it or retards will use it as a contrived excuse to call them hypocrites.

HOW CAN I FEED MY FAMILY WITHOUT NONFREE SOFTWARE???

can it really lock you out of non-free software? does it really do that by default?

obv no

why do you care about license if it just works, it's not botnet, and you don't have to pay for it?

you can easily change it in the sources.list file
MUH
FREEDOMS
What don't you understand about that you stupid nigger

No.

That's a good thing. If they want to be FSF approved, they must stop encouraging people to use it and remove that malware repo.

Attached: 797d85010dffd9e9362f6a01894bdede.png (473x488, 188K)

Select Yes because you're not an omega autist like Stallman.

Install Gentoo

If you weren't a freetard dipshit you would already be using ubunto so click no like the cuckold dipshit you are.

Fuck off fanboy loser.

Silly japtripfag, ubuntu is for noobs.
So you're the cuck.

best thread on Jow Forums right now

>just werks
>cant have that gotta be hackerman
seek employment

The distribution you are defending was literally created by a guy that thought killing himself because he got drunk and naked in front of cops was rape and he needed to make a statement.

I'm telling you for a fact that there is zero logic behind Debian's policies.

>buying the official story
stay ignorant goy, everyone knows the CIA niggers killed Ian because he resisted systemd

>cushy life
>slave
Hmmm

>obscure explanation
>no [at least partial] list of non free content
THIS IS WHY I HATE HELPERS AND INSTALLERS

do you need any of the
-non-free firmwares (network cards, modern processors, video cards etc)
-binary graphics drivers
-GCC documentations?
If you do, press yes. If you don't, press no.

It's not like he doesn't like it, he just didn't listed it on the list of entirely free GNU+Linux distributions.

Please do not feed the tripfags. Feeding creates a dependent population that is a potential health hazard.

I dont even get this message on installation. Completely free system is impossible anyway, unless yoy have no gpu

> GCC documentations?
Wew.

"N-no!"
You can always enable them later.

Install Ubuntu based distro instead

>plebians

No, also the reason why Stallman doesn't like Debian

You know there are free open source graphics drivers yes?

Can't watch those pizza vids without them, so yes.

Both need binary blobs to work properly. Its that linux firmware thing.

gcc documentation contains the GPL itself, which is an "invariant section", as you are not allowed to modify the GPL license itself.
GFDL with "invariant sections" does not satisfy DFSG.

>quoting the prequels
Do or do not, there is no try.

>Stallman doesn't like Debian
Sweet, yet another reason to use Debian.

If people dealt in absolutes, than we wouldn't be living in this fucked world today.

then

than

ðan,ð(ə)n/
conjunction & preposition

1. introducing the second element in a comparison.
"he was much smaller than his son"

2.used in expressions introducing an exception or contrast.
"he claims not to own anything other than his home"

He doesnt hate debian, he just disagrees with this decision. I do too and its a shame considering how debian was once the floss pioneer

then

(conjunctive) In that case.

If it’s locked, then we’ll need the key.
Is it 12 o'clock already? Then it's time for me to leave.
You don't like potatoes? What do you want me to cook, then?