Tfw Jow Forums was wrong

These DO shit on current SATA SSD's

By a country mile as well.

Attached: SSD 970 PROlEVO_Family ver.2_678x452.png (678x479, 177K)

Other urls found in this thread:

anandtech.com/show/10754/samsung-960-pro-ssd-review/7
amazon.co.uk/Samsung-970-EVO-V-NAND-Express/dp/B07CGGNX7S/
youtu.be/l7kr1Guf9Fw?t=122
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I'm not doubting you but do you have any numbers to back up your claim? "Shit on" isnt really quantifiable

This gib proof I'd like to see it too

inb4 it was just bait

Attached: 1527735690130.png (540x405, 67K)

not sure if bait or retardation?

Bottom three are SATA

Attached: 84209.png (650x440, 32K)

a start, but please post proper benchmarks of various i/o types

Tbqh don't really notice it in day to day use

anandtech.com/show/10754/samsung-960-pro-ssd-review/7
read the review yourself then

agreed, nvme is only worth it if your workload makes use of storage performance

>doesnt know the difference between a 6GB/s SATA limit and a PCIE speed

you might be retarded

those are 960's

970's are faster