So whatever happened to Threadripper? Never see anyone talk about it anymore

So whatever happened to Threadripper? Never see anyone talk about it anymore.

Attached: heug.jpg (1166x925, 65K)

Other urls found in this thread:

zdnet.com/article/computex-2018-amd-previews-32-core-2nd-gen-threadripper-and-7nm-epyc-processors/
youtube.com/watch?v=ozcEel1rNKM
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

you missed the whole COMPUTEX coverage, it seems.

zdnet.com/article/computex-2018-amd-previews-32-core-2nd-gen-threadripper-and-7nm-epyc-processors/

32 cores

3 2 c o r e s

Youre forgetting that threadripper is a consumer cpu, its something you buy on the store like any other cpu
EPYC is the real shit, its not consumer grade its for servers and it has fucking 64 cores / 128 threads
So if you want to compare consumer grade cpus its threadripper 2 vs i9xe, 32 cores vs 18 cores, and server grade its the intel 28 core meme xeons vs the 64 core epyc
[spoiler] make moar cores [/spoiler]

>mfw 256 threads/node

Attached: 1476473908346.png (432x504, 125K)

>64 cores per CPU
not yet - but since AMD announced the 32 cores TR, you can bet that there will be a core increase with Zen2. For example by putting three or four CCX on each die or by increasing the core count per complex.

>has fucking 64 cores / 128 threads
We will probably only see 48/96 at first as 7nm high volume production is still a bit behind. It will either be 2x6c or 3x4c CCX. Either way, the frequency scaling will probably allow twice the performance per socket compared to the first generation.

the 32 core TR is four dies, like an EPYC but with the PCIe and memory controllers disabled on half.

>all the anime you could encode on that monster
damn, i wish i wasn't a poorfag uni student.

> consumer CPU
No, is no.
Basically, it is a product created to allow people to overclock server CPUs and keep AMD server lineup intact.
> big fellas don't build servers themselves
And yet, multiplier is always locked on server CPUs.

Intel released 28 core 5GHz beast and all amd shills got BTFOd

You missed a word; they released one 28 core 5GHz beast. Since that's how many they can actually make a year.

Intel also promised that this CPU WILL be available.
So maybe STFU?

64 Rome when?

you have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. threadripper is very much consumer, because EPYC is the non-consumer shit (enterprise).
threadripper is for workstations and enthusiasts that want/need more cores/threads and more pci-e lanes than Ryzen gives you.

fucking retard.

>So whatever happened to Threadripper? Never see anyone talk about it anymore.

Nice shill thread

Attached: 1528445007753.jpg (691x771, 112K)

are you even trying? every knows it was an old unlocked xeon that was under exotic cooling and drew way over 1000 watts during load even on conservative calculations (low vcore).

Attached: 1487786671324.jpg (680x510, 16K)

OMG shut up already!
It was a demonstration what you can expect from intel.
If they demonstrated a 28 core CPU with 5GHz and promised to deliver. Then they will.
Probably Q1 next year and most likely on 10nm process.

At this point it's just obvious.

>At this point it's just obvious.
yeah, you are....

Attached: 1484089290593.png (400x215, 175K)

>implying AMD dindu notin wong
Remember when they released they first ryzens and they failed to compile software?
Haha, at least intel haven't failed this much

>at least intel haven't failed this much
if you werent a retarded baiter you'd know they have failed more than AMD over the years, and they're currently tripping over their own feet trying to damage control and failing at 10nm and gluing together cores into housefires

kys retard, done with you

Attached: 1471825559814.jpg (500x500, 21K)

>manlytears builds his new pc

You're an idiot they had the 28core in negative temperatures to make sure it could be ran at 5ghz. The CPU they were using was a xeon. Intel has competition for the first time in many years and Intel is shitting the bed.

Oh wow all these amdshills trying to damage controll after an i9 ripped amds ass

>i9
keep dreaming

Intel wouldnt be taking old xeon and unlocking it to 5ghz with an industrial cooler to get sub-ambient temps to chill this 1kw+ housefire and conveniently "forget" to mention that it's an unlocked and overclocked Xeon server chip if they werent in full panic damage control mode from AMD releasing a 32 core cpu for their workstation/enthusiast boards.

And 1kw is a low estimate if they somehow managed to get it to run at less than 1.3vcore which they most likely didnt, so if they run anything more intensive than a short as fuck cinebench at over 1.3cvore it's going to draw at least 200W more according to all credible overclockers.

Attached: 1489490574057.jpg (720x540, 35K)

Attached: 1501250462016.png (600x600, 32K)

All these words and all i can hear is some salty amd shill tears

hallucination is pretty common when you're dying, especially when it's by your own shilltel tears

I'm neither of the people you're responding to but
>trying this hard

If you're going to shitpost, at least try to sound intelligent.

2019 in 7nm EPYC format

is liquid cooling required?
how many watts?

Attached: intel cuck.png (1228x1502, 944K)

Correct
Consumer is a retarded term at 16 cores and 64 pci-e lanes. EPYC has lower clocks you seem to forget and no one needs the number of pcie lanes nor can you use them in a ATX/E-ATX format. The power utilization/size/package you would need to use the number of pcie lanes in EPYC is RACKMOUNT based. All of the cuts and perks are sensible for threadripper. Enterprise today is mainly some stupid ass cloud to serve consumers anyway. AKA leasing someone else's shit.

less than 300W TDP

enthusiasts are also consumers.

>just encoding instead of using a highly polished version of the Waifu2x algorithm to upscale em to 8k

>waifu2x
>on anime
You mean the same algorithm that butchers cel animated anime beyond recognition? Hang yourself.

I cant cuz all the gud baits are already taken

i think i read in it's github repo that it uses gpu for upscaling. i suppose implementing a cpu version could be possible.

What they use is probably some shit like 2xsai.
Waifu2x is a neural network powered trained bullshit that can actually upscale art in a way that looks like the original trace in most cases.

Attached: w2x.png (1058x794, 388K)

I indeed had forgot this detail.
That's probably more a job for a cluster of nvidia teslas or something like that.

it can scale decent resolution anime fairly well. there are problems with old 480p anime, though.

Attached: 1521742522123.png (2560x1440, 3.13M)

that pic is scaled with waifu2x from 720p to 1440p btw

>hurr durr what is demonstration

a demonstration of what is the extremest best chip that intel can muster from it's factories and ran under extreme best conditions
meanwhile amd will just use an air cooler

Nope, Intel is no were near releasing a 28-core 5Ghz SKU any time soon. What Intel really meant is that they are going to be releasing "Customer-tier a.k.a i9s" Skylake XCC chips in Q4 2018.

The PR stunt demo is just fucking retard as shit that only fooled computer illiterate crowd. Intel should have just stuck with announcing customer-tier Skylake XCC chips coming Q4 2018 and kept 8086K as the "5Ghz stunt" unit.

>Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was Overclocked
lul

Attached: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS83L0MvNzc2NTY4L29yaWdpbmFsL0xOMi5KUEc=.jpg (628x278, 33K)

Attached: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9TL1YvNzc3MzQzL29yaWdpbmFsLzAzLkpQRw==.jpg (711x457, 57K)

A demonstration of what? It was a demonstration completely worthless to a consumer since they were demonstrating an undeliverable product.

so they demonstrated on a 14nm piece of highly binned old hardware just to showcase something that we will see from intel in the future on another node?

do you even get paid to say such things?

remember when turbo boost max bios were causing broadwell-e cpu's to get fried like a chicken and still they havent bothered to fix the problem?

yeah good times

i dont know who the fuck told the press that this chiller was on sub temps...

the company clearly states that it lowers the temp to 4c it doesnt go below that at all
its a chiller not a phase changer

steve is an idiot and he should have known better before saying such a stupid thing

because it's DOA now intel has a 28 core 5ghz product

A few people here have them, just finished the push pull setup on my TR4 Liqtech 360 / 1950x. Will do 4.2ghz now.

Attached: 26165373_574165616257455_503201303772326488_n.jpg (540x960, 77K)

*they overclocked an old 2.7ghz 28 core Xeon on fucking -10*C phase change cooling

Even the Threadripper can do 5.2ghz on that setup

>on 4*C liquid cooling

Fixed

OMG you faggots, don't get it, do you?
It was a demonstration of what Intel's 10nm be like.
Yeah, yeah, I know, currently their only 10nm CPU is garbage.
But just wait to next year and you'll see a fucking 10nm 5GHz and 28 core beast!

Screen shot this you fucking amd shills

Your the first person and/or group that have claimed it to be -4C. Everybody else is either not stating the temperature or saying -10C.

Not that it matters that much, subambient cooling of either 30 or 36 degrees is still exotic non-consumer grade.

What is your source?

Nobody overclocks or moves away from manufacturer defaults in an ENTERPRISE environment. If it's not a consumer CPU what is it, a researcher's CPU?

Anandtech writeup on it, they used Hailea or something.

Savage.

Attached: 1511352780332.png (248x189, 54K)

As you can see OP, any TR thread is overwhelmed by shitposting from the intel shills who are paid to post here.

Attached: 1515203298004.jpg (782x440, 46K)

well fuck you, at least i'm making some money friend, you promote your poozen for free

Correct, but I believe small companies would, given the chance. Imagine +20% increase in performance, no crashes if properly tested - why not. People don't do it because it's not their responsibility and they'd rather convince a business to shell out some more money for another hardware.
In fact, I wonder why there aren't any KVM on consumer Ryzens, some entrepeneurs are probably willing to risk it.

10/10

64c ebyn how? 16 core dies or are they gonna slam 8*8cores in there somehow
ryzen 3700 16cores @4.2-4.9 when

imagine if tesla launched a 1000 mile electric car and Porsche would put a 911 on a boat and have it travel 1200 miles

OK, done.

Attached: 10nm-be-like.png (523x134, 10K)

>intel 10nm del(ID)ayed to 2019
>amd already have 7nm prototypes
>amd has 32 core enthusiast/workstation chip already
>intel tries to disctract by OCing old server chip that they unlocked and draws over 1200W and needs industrial cooling that literally no one except extreme overclockers would even be interested in cus it serves no purpose except to look flashy
>"forgot" to say it was OC'd and how it was cooled
the intel damage control on this is over the top

Attached: 1487452561666.jpg (192x171, 26K)

>all these buttmad AMDumpasses bitching about a PROTOTYPE

It’s a proving grounds chip retards, the real thing will be even better. Your MOUR COURS 250W housfire can’t compete at all. AMDead. literally KYS.

why dont you give us a good reason for the prototype demonstration of something that will never exist, mr shilltel?

>calls 250W housefire
>all intel shit draws way more than this
>intel still just listing the stock (non boosted) TDP
>intels demo drew over 1200W and needed industrial cooling


youtube.com/watch?v=ozcEel1rNKM

Attached: 1451416109402.jpg (400x460, 36K)

you can stop posting now

Attached: ok_roll.gif (408x225, 1.76M)

>my post got deleted

Lol holy shit mods are so easily triggered.

Attached: talkshitgethit.gif (500x227, 1.59M)

It's a wet firecracker. No one has any real use for 32 threads and it can't clock as high as a 7900X. Not only that, but the 7900X is significantly better for gaming and rendering videos/3D objects/images than Threadripper at the same cost, so it makes no sense to buy Threadripper over the Core i9 series.

>No one has any real use for 32 threads
1 shekel has been deposited to your bank account

that's a big die

Attached: 1528562776687.jpg (552x661, 60K)

Attached: 1523750275228.png (1906x1536, 1.67M)

for you

just cus you're a brainlet that cant come up with a use for it and i call you out on your bullshit doesnt mean i'm a shill, retard.
and you replying with that meme to that just proves you are the shill like i said.

Attached: shilltel.jpg (900x1152, 180K)

>amdfags
>intelfags
>shills
>no u
Someone please nuke Jow Forums already.

Jesus fuck stop replying.

kek

They will probably put four CCXs per Zeppelin die since 64 core EBYN is all but confirmed. Expect the 3700 on at least 12cores.

Attached: shit just got real - realer than real.jpg (600x411, 80K)

no
250W for the 32 core, 3GHz base/3.4GHz boost, it's faster than a EPYC 7601

I wonder if that's the all core boost. TR1 has better single core performance than some Zen+ parts, it'd be a shame if they dropped that.

when AMD reported those clockspeeds they said they were still working on it, I think they can probably get a few hairs higher than what they have now
I think the all core boost could be that 3.4GHz, seeing that the 7601 has a 2.7 all core while complying to its 180W tdp

Everyone talks about threadripper

Did that illegal gas from the chiller get to your head brian?

>normie tier garbage

Attached: 1528565377523.png (653x726, 243K)

Attached: 1528222249083.png (1196x676, 1.05M)

Attached: 1523293491756.png (554x400, 305K)

>MAGA hat
Not technology, fuck off to

>underage ifunny tier memes

Attached: 1523063695818.jpg (700x700, 58K)

I mean, don't get me wrong, 5ghz 28 core with a 2.7ghz base clock that's like an 80% overclock or something, that's still very impressive by any standard but Intel shills are acting like this is going to be something you can buyoff the shelf at 5ghz. FFS we were doing 5ghz on phase change with Athlon XPs back in the day

i got like 80% oc on my c2d e4300 back in the day

Attached: 67200-full.gif (1088x816, 272K)

Attached: 1497910377702.jpg (284x306, 8K)