Why has Intel always sucked at dedicated GPUs?
Would a modern attempt still suck? Intel HD isn't as shit as it used to be and it's a fuckload better than GMA was.
Why has Intel always sucked at dedicated GPUs?
Joseph White
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Aaron Price
gimme mutt milkies
Ethan Clark
Because they keep trying to force-feed people their GPUs with those integrated GPUs. So they probably devote nothing to dGPUs. Also, pic has 9/10 tits, but a 5/10 face.
Hunter Foster
They've never actually released dedicated GPUs afaik. They did hire raja koduri from AMD recently, though, so we will probably see an attempt in the next few years.
Evan Lewis
Intel have never made a dedicated GPU
What the fuck are you talking about
Charles Wood
cute whore
Levi Roberts
>The current state of Jow Forums
I thought this was a technically board.
Bentley Butler
>what is i740
Daniel Cox
>I thought this was a technically board.
not them, but they are right.
Intel never made anything close to a dGPU.
Even larrabee, which was larped as a dgpu, it had x86 cores inside, like xeon phi
most possibly had some kind of OS running inside, like xeon phy
it was never released,
we never heard of its 3D rendering capabilities
we never heard about its support on D3D or openGL or any other API,
only slides exist which claim that this was supposed to be a dedicated CPU.
On top of that, larrabee was mostly ALUs, supporting SIMDs and competed from day one in number crunching with amd and novidia gpus.
According to your logic, novidia never presented a fake fermi card. A non-working dummy prototype with in shiny packaging counts as a real product.
Nathan Bennett
UGLY AS FUCK