Are you ready for 64-bit Tor Browser, Jow Forums?
Tor Browser x64
Other urls found in this thread:
it'll probably be shit
It's not.
why?
there was 64 bit for a long time
why would I need to buy drugs in 64 bit?
Do people still use tor, I thought it was full of FBI back doors?
>people use tor
Yes
>fbi back doors
No
feel free point out what part of the code that's compromised, user
The code isn't.
The nodes are.
>Are you ready for 64-bit Tor Browser, Jow Forums?
Ever since Applebaum was forced out due to unproven accusations which he denies I don't trust TOR project to not put some fuckery to unmask "dangerous hate crimes against women and minorities". That's not an actual quote, but its coming down the pipe. SJW fucks destroy everything they come into contact with. It's only a matter of time.
t. exit node operating cia nigger
for the 100000th time you don't need tor browser to use tor, you can use tor as a socks5 proxy with any up-to-date browser or any application generally
Twice the bits for CP. Great.
fuck off
Tor Browser based on Quantum when?
Because Jow Forums is fully of edgy contrarians who bemoan things they don't understand to make themselves seem knowledgeable, whilst doing the exact opposite.
The odds of ending up with an entry and exit node that are corrupted is like 1 in 2,000,000.
So shut the fuck up, you: Again, don't speak about something unless you understand it. Grazie.
You need entry and exit node to correlate, idiot.
See: And: Then: Shut Up
They can't, even if they wanted to, since the code is open to public audit.
See: And: Then: Shut up
In september. Not sure why you want this, "quantum" is garbage.
Fatastic arguments, you truly enlightened me.
>grazie
What are you, a pastanigger?
>iq_map.jpg
>Italy: 102
>European average: 100
>smug.jpg
>iq
>you don't use caps in filename unless you're a piece of shit
Why do I need my browser to use more than 4GB of ram?
Really? I was running a sock5 proxy via outline VPN but never tried connecting to an onion sure. Too bad my digitalocean account is out of balance.
>because we can
Says the webdev.
>They can't, even if they wanted to, since the code is open to public audit.
OpenSSL's code was open to public audit, yet glow-in-the-dark CIA niggers still managed to exploit a major vulnerability in it for years before anybody caught on.
Well, evidence obtained by that route hasn't been used in court and if they were to, they would have disclose it.
So, it doesn't really matter.
No it's not.
Yes, it is. An underperforming, buggy, resource hog.